Don't be fooled Folks

Robo said:
Actually, if you were paying attention, Barr has testified before the Senate Judiciary committee that he Barr ask Mueller if his ignoring a decision on obstruction in his report was based in a position that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and Mueller said “NO.” House Democrats are making the argument that a sitting president cannot be indicted and that’s why Muller didn’t indict him and thereby he Mueller left any obstruction decision up to the Congress and not Barr.



Of course! The Democrat’s other reasons for not impeaching is Nancy Pelosi is begging them not to issue articles of impeachment because she remembers how Bill Clinton’s favorable numbers went up when he was impeached, and Nancy and the rest of the Democrats know there’s no credible evidence for impeaching Trump. That’s why The Democrats are conducting an impeachment in drag in the House Judiciary committee aimed at simply trashing Trump and Barr for the base and the 2020 election.



Trump has done more to oppose Putin & Russia than any President since Reagan.

It’s the Democrats, and their flunky media propaganda machine CNN & MSNBC that’s Putin’s puppet dividing Americans with trump Hate!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Trump delayed implementing congressionally-mandated sanctions against Russia and has refused to consider other sanctions. He takes Putin's side over what his own intelligence agencies tell him. He's all talk and no action. Trump is the only one who thinks that he's been tough on Russia. And you think so because Trump said so. Trump is the biggest source of fake news.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Sitting presidents have been indicted a few times. It's called "impeachment" in the case of sitting Presidents. it's in the "CONSTITUTION." Everything concerning government actions is determined legally by the Constitution.
Click to expand...

The usual ignorant barf from Robo. There's quite a bit of difference between a criminal indictment and impeachment.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Teflon Don said:
So McConnell tells Pelousy what to do?

Real courageous cunt she is
Click to expand...
Yet another ignoranus. There's no point in the House impeaching Trump when they know up front that, no matter what the evidence says, the Senate will refuse to convict.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Well friend I do believe William Barr has testified that he had ask Mueller why he made no recommendation concerning obstruction by the President and if it was because of the unresolved issue of the legality of indicting a sitting President, and Mueller said "NO!" Have you read the Mueller report? If you have, point out specifically where in the report your claim is proven. I personally watched all of Barr's testimony before the Senate committee. That's where my recollections are coming from.
Click to expand...

It's right there on page one of volume II.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
So you’re a non-believer in due process, right? You’ve convicted Barr without any testimony from Mueller.

I’ll wait for Mueller’s testimony if the Democrats ever call him to testify. What seems to be the hold up with that? Nadler seems “quick draw McGraw” when it comes to subpoenas for everybody but Mueller. Could it possibly be they don’t want to hear what the author of the Mueller Report has to say face to face, under oath, they just want to put on a theater show of contempt of Congress for the Republican bureaucrats that don’t hate Trump?



To my knowledge, Nadler hasn’t called Mueller to testify, do you know differently?
Click to expand...
Of course, what Mueller wrote in his report doesn't mean a thing to you. The Mueller report contradicts Barr and demonstrates his guilt.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
So you’re a non-believer in due process, right? You’ve convicted Barr without any testimony from Mueller.

I’ll wait for Mueller’s testimony if the Democrats ever call him to testify. What seems to be the hold up with that? Nadler seems “quick draw McGraw” when it comes to subpoenas for everybody but Mueller. Could it possibly be they don’t want to hear what the author of the Mueller Report has to say face to face, under oath, they just want to put on a theater show of contempt of Congress for the Republican bureaucrats that don’t hate Trump?



To my knowledge, Nadler hasn’t called Mueller to testify, do you know differently?
Click to expand...
Or you could simply read Mueller's report. It's right there, in black and white.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
Yet another ignoranus. There's no point in the House impeaching Trump when they know up front that, no matter what the evidence says, the Senate will refuse to convict.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

There is. The act of impeaching gives the House more powers to investigate. They can hold public hearings with Trumps idiots testifying. It would be great TV.
 
Robo said:
I thank you for your juvenile sandbox insult. You're momma must be proud, huh?

Impeachments are indictments for high crimes & misdemeanors, i.e. "crimes" They're simply the system for criminally indicting Presidents, Judges & appointed and confirmed bureaucrats.
Click to expand...

Impeachment can only come from the House. Big difference from a criminal indictment.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Being a Trump stooge puppet covering up something, (only god knows what), for Trump. Me thinks you need evidence first. What’s your evidence? I’ll understand if you can’t come up with any!!!!!



Again, present your evidence! I’ll understand again if you have none!!!!!

Were you so outraged when Obama’s AG Erik Holder said “I’m Barrack’s wing man, I’m his boy?”



I don’t recall Trump claiming executive privilege concerning Mueller testifying. Either neither House of the Congress hasn’t called Mueller, or Mueller doesn’t want to testify voluntarily, huh?
Click to expand...
No testimony needed, all that's needed is in his report.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
Trump has been busily corrupting the justice system in preparation for this day.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You can always tell when the leftists are scared. They start projecting that which they are doing or that which they have done.

Do not ask for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee
 
Gonzomin said:
Mueller was not involved in impeachment. He was involved in Russias corrupting our election processes to help Trump. It was not in his mandate. However, he made it clear that Trump was involved in many obstructions. The Dems are following up. Trump is a criminal and I hope he does not escape like Nixon.
Click to expand...

Actually, Mueller was involved in the cabal’s conspiracy to frame a sitting President. When it’s proven he knew even before he began his phony investigation & that his witch hunt was a phony conspiracy and there was no there, there related to Trump and the Russians, Mueller himself will be in jeopardy. One cannot “obstruct” a non-crime, friend!!!!!!
 
domer76 said:
900 former federal prosecutors said he would be prosecuted for obstruction if he was not President.
Click to expand...

Then let 900 federal prosecutors prosecute him right after you impeach and remove him from office. Why for god's sake haven't the cowardly Democrats started the impeachment yet???????
 
rjhenn said:
As usual, not a clue. Impeachment is not the same as a criminal indictment. Impeachment is the constitutional mechanism for removing a criminal President. It is DOJ policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Impeachment is the only route available. And impeachment is a no go from the start because impeachment is tried in the Senate, which is controlled by Trump cultists.
Click to expand...

Well pen pal, I contend that impeachment is simply another word for “indictment.’ It’s a “CRIMINAL CHARGE.” The only difference is impeachment is reserved for politicians & judges while an indictment is reserved for everybody else. Look it up in a dictionary friend and please post whatever else different you find about them.

It's clearly Trump and the Republicans who have no solutions for the real problems facing America. If they did, why didn't they do something about them during the 2 years that they had control of the government?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well pen pal, they deregulated Obamas America, cut the corporate tax and made small corporate America competitive with BIG corporations & thereby brought back jobs to America & created the greatest economy in the history of these United States. That alone friend makes them twice the DOERS of the Democrats.
 
rjhenn said:
Barr is a liar. Mueller said in his report that the reason that he didn't pursue indictments against Trump was because of DOJ policy. And you avoid real news in favor of the fake news that you get from the right-wing propaganda outlets.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Why haven't the Democrats called Mueller to their committees and determined by his under oath testimony what the truth is about his inner actions with Barr? I know why, they're afraid Mueller will validate Barr's testimony, huh?
 
rjhenn said:
Trump delayed implementing congressionally-mandated sanctions against Russia and has refused to consider other sanctions.
Click to expand...

Not true! All of the Obama sanctions were never held up or removed and Trump has added new sanctions. Trump has sold arms to Russia’s enemies, scolded Germany’s Prime Minister for building a natural gas pipeline to Russia to buy Russian natural gas when Trump has offered to sell Germany American natural gas. America’s armed forces have killed many Russians in Syria under Trump. Trump has ordered 2 air strikes on Syrian targets, a Russian ally. Putin has absolutely no reason to like Trump, as good as he loved Obama who told Putin to “stop it” when it became known he was meddling in our elections, and he, (Obama) told a Russian minister on an open mike, he, (Obama was unaware was open, that he, (Obama), “would have more latitude to treat Russia better after his, (Obama’s), reelection and he ask the minister to tell Vlad.”

He takes Putin's side over what his own intelligence agencies tell him.
Click to expand...

The same intell that told Bush that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and the same intell who’s heads were Clapper and Brennan the guys that were trying to frame him for a factitious crime.

He's all talk and no action. Trump is the only one who thinks that he's been tough on Russia. And you think so because Trump said so. Trump is the bigges
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
t source of fake news.

Actually good buddy, I think so, because the facts prove so!!!!!!! Stop watching CNN & MASNBC friend, watch Fox and see the real news.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top