Don't be fooled Folks

rjhenn said:
Of course, what Mueller wrote in his report doesn't mean a thing to you. The Mueller report contradicts Barr and demonstrates his guilt.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That's just your story! Get your Democrat heroes to bring Mueller into their committee investigation under oath and let every member question him. They won't because they know Mueller under oath will verify Barr's testimony, right pal?
 
rjhenn said:
Impeachment can only come from the House. Big difference from a criminal indictment.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Indictments can only come from Grand Juries, the civilian equal of the People's House Of Congress. BOTH are "REPRESENTATIVES" of the PEOPLE!!!!!! NO DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!!
 
rjhenn said:
Mueller laid out a bunch.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Mueller laid out NO crimes! If he had, he'd have recommended Trump be charged with a crime. Trump delivered thousands of documents, every witness requested by Mueller, never claimed executive privilege, nor fired anybody connected with Mueller's witch hunt. NO COLLUSION!!!!! One cannot be charged with obstruction of a non-crime. Trump had plenty of valid reason to fire Mueller, Rosenstein and stop the witch hunt. He did none of that either!!!!!!
 
Robo said:
That's just your story! Get your Democrat heroes to bring Mueller into their committee investigation under oath and let every member question him. They won't because they know Mueller under oath will verify Barr's testimony, right pal?
Click to expand...

That is exactly what is happening. Mueller does not want it on TV live. He knows what the Repubs would do. They would make it into a show for the right, He wants a sane and reasonable panel. Not likely when the Reds see the cameras. However, he will testify honestly and fully then submit to questioning. Your far-right Republican deities will get their chance.
 
Robo said:
Actually, Mueller was involved in the cabal’s conspiracy to frame a sitting President. When it’s proven he knew even before he began his phony investigation & that his witch hunt was a phony conspiracy and there was no there, there related to Trump and the Russians, Mueller himself will be in jeopardy. One cannot “obstruct” a non-crime, friend!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Trump fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. Trump constantly acts like he's guilty. The investigation started before Trump took office, even before the election.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
One cannot "obstruct" non-crime! That's why Mueller didn't charge him! It's elementary my dear pal!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Mueller didn't charge him because DOJ policy says that he can't indict a sitting President.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Then let 900 federal prosecutors prosecute him right after you impeach and remove him from office. Why for god's sake haven't the cowardly Democrats started the impeachment yet???????
Click to expand...
Because the rotten to the core GOP controls the Senate.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Well pen pal, I contend that impeachment is simply another word for “indictment.’ It’s a “CRIMINAL CHARGE.” The only difference is impeachment is reserved for politicians & judges while an indictment is reserved for everybody else. Look it up in a dictionary friend and please post whatever else different you find about them.



Well pen pal, they deregulated Obamas America, cut the corporate tax and made small corporate America competitive with BIG corporations & thereby brought back jobs to America & created the greatest economy in the history of these United States. That alone friend makes them twice the DOERS of the Democrats.
Click to expand...

Impeachment can only be brought by the House, completely unlike a criminal indictment. And impeachment is the only way to charge a sitting President. We are also seeing record budget deficits. Your "greatest economy in the history of these United States" is yet another right-wing delusion. And Trump has done nothing about his campaign promises about healthcare and infrastructure. It's all been about handouts to the rich. Trump has been using his office to enrich himself, while continuing to scam the rest of us.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Why haven't the Democrats called Mueller to their committees and determined by his under oath testimony what the truth is about his inner actions with Barr? I know why, they're afraid Mueller will validate Barr's testimony, huh?
Click to expand...
Mueller's written report makes Barr out to be a liar. There's no need for his testimony.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Not true! All of the Obama sanctions were never held up or removed and Trump has added new sanctions. Trump has sold arms to Russia’s enemies, scolded Germany’s Prime Minister for building a natural gas pipeline to Russia to buy Russian natural gas when Trump has offered to sell Germany American natural gas. America’s armed forces have killed many Russians in Syria under Trump. Trump has ordered 2 air strikes on Syrian targets, a Russian ally. Putin has absolutely no reason to like Trump, as good as he loved Obama who told Putin to “stop it” when it became known he was meddling in our elections, and he, (Obama) told a Russian minister on an open mike, he, (Obama was unaware was open, that he, (Obama), “would have more latitude to treat Russia better after his, (Obama’s), reelection and he ask the minister to tell Vlad.”



The same intell that told Bush that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and the same intell who’s heads were Clapper and Brennan the guys that were trying to frame him for a factitious crime.

t source of fake news.

Actually good buddy, I think so, because the facts prove so!!!!!!! Stop watching CNN & MASNBC friend, watch Fox and see the real news.
Click to expand...
Fox provides more fake news than the rest of the MSM combined.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Cut and paste it for me good buddy!!!!!
Click to expand...
Yes, we know you can't look it up for yourself:
"Beginning in 2017, the President of the United States took a variety of actions towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed justice. The Order appointing the
Special Counsel gave this Office jurisdiction to investigate matters that arose directly from the FBI's Russia investigation, including whether the President had obstructed justice in connection with Russia-related investigations. The Special Counsel's jurisdiction also covered potentially
obstructive acts related to the Special Counsel's investigation itself. This Volume of our report summarizes our obstruction-of-justice investigation of the President.
We first describe the considerations that guided our obstruction-of-justice investigation, and then provide an overview of this Volume:
First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial
judgment. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that "the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions" in violation of "the constitutional separation of powers."1 Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC's legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising
prosecutorial jurisdiction. And apart from OLC's constitutional view, we recognized that a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would place burdens on the President's capacity to govern and potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct."

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
That's just your story! Get your Democrat heroes to bring Mueller into their committee investigation under oath and let every member question him. They won't because they know Mueller under oath will verify Barr's testimony, right pal?
Click to expand...

Mueller's written report contradicts Barr's statement.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Indictments can only come from Grand Juries, the civilian equal of the People's House Of Congress. BOTH are "REPRESENTATIVES" of the PEOPLE!!!!!! NO DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
According to DOJ policy, a sitting President cannot be indicted. He can only be impeached. There's your difference.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Please explain how & be specific!!!!!! I'll understand if you can't!!!!!
Click to expand...
He's busily appointing judges that he expects will rule in his favor. He's also packing the "swamp" with his own loyalists.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Mueller laid out NO crimes! If he had, he'd have recommended Trump be charged with a crime. Trump delivered thousands of documents, every witness requested by Mueller, never claimed executive privilege, nor fired anybody connected with Mueller's witch hunt. NO COLLUSION!!!!! One cannot be charged with obstruction of a non-crime. Trump had plenty of valid reason to fire Mueller, Rosenstein and stop the witch hunt. He did none of that either!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Purest delusion, as usual. There was plenty of evidence of collusion, which is not a crime, but should be. And there is plenty of evidence of obstruction, but Mueller was not allowed to indict a sitting President.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top