SmarterthanYou
rebel
Asking such a question proves you have no understanding of the 10th amendment.
educate me, coward.
Asking such a question proves you have no understanding of the 10th amendment.
So you support your own selfish wants over the life of an INNOCENT person?
Yes it is.Driving isn't a right.
Yes I do. I drive without a license quite often, actually.You don't have the privilege to drive without a license.
Yes, but according to your line of reasoning, you are guilty until proven innocent, remember?? Your ass goes to jail until your innocence can be proven. This "checkpoint" is just a slight inconvenience to combat wife beating, right? I'm sure you won't complain...You're the one making the claim I believe it's OK to beat your wife. Never said anything of the sort.
Already addressed.However, STY and the rest of the drunks have said they believe freedom to choose is more important than someone else's right to life.
Continued evasion...STFU or back up your demand, cunt.
Yes they do. See the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 14th Amendments.DUI checkpoints don't violate your rights since you don't have a right to not be inconvenienced.
Irrelevant.What would you prefer, someone being inconvenienced at a checkpoint or a family of an innocent person being inconvenienced having to attend the funeral of that family member?
Spoken like a selfish drunk driver.
Nothing totalitarian about expecting people to not drive drunk.
Didn't your Pa ever tell you about lying? He should whup your ass!You haven't said so before. Liar.
You don't get to dictate that. You are not the king.What's hateful about expecting people to not drive drunk.
Driving drunk is, in and of itself, a crime. You are off topic.I can comprehend that you believe unless a drunk driver hits an innocent person there isn't a crime and it's OK for them to have driven drunk.
Their opinion is the law of the land, stupid fuck.
![]()
Constitutional. Law of the land.
![]()
You can't own a bazooka!Joe!
Yes it does.2nd Amendment doesn't mean you can own weapons of war.
The 1st amendment means Congress cannot pass such a law. That amendment does not apply to the States, however. States can pass such laws, according to their own constitutions.Just like 1st Amendment doesn't mean you can yell fire in a movie theater
I speak the truth.
He did. He believes in the freedom to make personal choices being more important that an innocent person not being killed by someone so selfish they'd drive drunk.
There's a resemblance to you. YOU'RE the one whining because you were inconvenienced. Remember, I wasn't the one stopped that complained about it. You were.
Hopefully a drunk driver will hit your family since you believe the personal choice to drive drunk is more important that the right to life of the innocent person they hit.
No one has the right to make the personal choice to drive drunk.
No one's rights were violated. Being inconvenienced doesn't do that. If you think so, run a red light or a stop sign.
Evasion. Answer the question put to you.Here's a better question.
Yes it is.
Yes I do. I drive without a license quite often, actually.
my money's on sty.