DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

[gfm7175]

its exactly the same comparison. you want the government to violate the rights of people to prohibit activities you don't like................

Yup, precisely what he wants, and precisely the point that I am making. CFM doesn't like drunk driving and supports DUI checkpoints to stop people from doing so. Maybe I don't like wife beating and support jailing husbands to stop them from doing so.

 

[gfm7175]

Here's a better question. Is it OK if a person makes the personal choice to drive drunk?

If you're driving without a license, you've broken the law.

Yes, and if you are driving while intoxicated, you have also broken the law.

However, that doesn't make DUI checkpoints okay, nor does that make driver's license checkpoints okay.

I suppose you also support having checkpoints for driver's licenses too, correct?? I guess it's gonna take you a while longer to get to work now...

 

[domer76]

Yes, and if you are driving while intoxicated, you have also broken the law.

However, that doesn't make DUI checkpoints okay, nor does that make driver's license checkpoints okay.

I suppose you also support having checkpoints for driver's licenses too, correct?? I guess it's gonna take you a while longer to get to work now...

Constitutional

Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

LSMFT

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Constitutional

Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

LSMFT

only failed american slaves demand government tell them whats constitutional and whats not. you still haven't answered my question, coward.

 

[Scut Farkus]

cfm, bad american, advocates wife beating. full stop. you don't have to say, "full stop", when you're typing stuff, dumbass. whatever.

 

[Scut Farkus]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Your_papers,_please
"Your papers, please" (or "Papers, please") is an expression or trope associated with police state functionaries, as popularized in Hollywood movies featuring Nazi Party officials demanding identification from citizens during random stops or at checkpoints. It is a cultural metaphor for life in a police state.

 

[domer76]

only failed american slaves demand government tell them whats constitutional and whats not. you still haven't answered my question, coward.

Laughable cunt.

 

[gfm7175]

but we're not wrong........................can you be stopped by a cop just to check for your drivers license if you've broken no law?

Is your personal freedom to drive drunk more important than someone's right to not have you harm/kill them?

Answer STY's question... Stop evading.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Laughable cunt.

failed american. pretty deplorable, actually...........you must be a closet trump fan

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Answer STY's question... Stop evading.

he's not going to, he's too cowardly, as is domer. they won't do anything that shakes their foundation of big brother standing in front of them while they cower behind 'the courts said so'..........

 

[domer76]

failed american. pretty deplorable, actually...........you must be a closet trump fan

 

[domer76]

he's not going to, he's too cowardly, as is domer. they won't do anything that shakes their foundation of big brother standing in front of them while they cower behind 'the courts said so'..........

^This from a fucking idiot that thinks we don’t need vehicles in a modern society.

That was the stupidest post EVER on this forum.

 

[gfm7175]

You're one of many that believes it's OK to drive drunk even if it takes innocent lives.

Per your reasoning presented here: You're one of many that believes it's OK to beat wives into comas even if it takes innocent lives.

I don't believe it's OK to beat your wife.

Yes you do, per your very own reasoning evidenced above, yet now you are saying that you don't. You are now locked in paradox.

Have you stopped beating your wife?

I'm not the one using this reasoning... YOU are.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

^This from a fucking idiot that thinks we don’t need vehicles in a modern society.

That was the stupidest post EVER on this forum.

i'm not the one who refuses to answer a simple question for fear it destroys their position, even though that position is wrong from the start.

you never answer questions, just point to bullshit court opinions and then cowardly hide behind them. you're a slave, a failed american, no more worthy of freedom than CFM is. you two are alot alike.

 

[gfm7175]

You have no right to drive drunk.

Using your very own reasoning: You have no right to drive without a license.

 

[domer76]

i'm not the one who refuses to answer a simple question for fear it destroys their position, even though that position is wrong from the start.

you never answer questions, just point to bullshit court opinions and then cowardly hide behind them. you're a slave, a failed american, no more worthy of freedom than CFM is. you two are alot alike.

“Vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society.

Stupidest post EVER on this forum.

 

[gfm7175]

using your logic, since you don't believe it's ok to beat your wife, we could have regular home inspections to ensure you don't beat your wife......................you see how stupid your logic is?

He's also locked in paradox, since he is now simultaneously asserting and denying his very own line of reasoning.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

“Vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society.

Stupidest post EVER on this forum.

and now you'll stay stuck on your idiot reality of half a statement.........that's the stupidest thing ever

 

[Scut Farkus]

wait, am I q?

 

[Scut Farkus]

jahr null!