lol.. that was really good Jack,you have a twisted sense of humor - i like it
I know Dukkha will like it. (I think he calls it 'Karma' )
lol.. that was really good Jack,you have a twisted sense of humor - i like it
that is not a Christian. Christians are the bride of Christ. The Bride of Christ does not commit fornication with post Christ false prophets. there are many. a "chaste virgin " has not touched the unclean things. wow ! who knew Bible is so adult yet innocent ? the only time I see people say the name of Jesus; it is done in mocking, scorning, blaspheming, denying , and mingling his Holiness with every manner of false gods/ idols. does an espoused virgin bride speak of her husband in that way ? no love there. false wife. divorce is correct for the fornication.
n Buddhism, the three marks of existence are three characteristics ; of all existence and beings, namely impermanence (anicca), unsatisfactoriness or suffering (dukkha), and non-self (anattā)I know Dukkha will like it. (I think he calls it 'Karma' )
what the hell do you want, jack ? you know I am a witness. I testify. it is my schtick. it is what I do. it is good.
Kalama Sutta
The people of Kalama asked the Buddha who to believe out of all the ascetics, sages, venerables, and holy ones who, like himself, passed through their town.
They complained that they were confused by the many contradictions they discovered in what they heard.
The Kalama Sutta is the Buddha's reply.
– Do not believe anything on mere hearsay.
– Do not believe in traditions merely because they are old and have been handed down for many generations and in many places.
– Do not believe anything on account of rumors or because people talk a a great deal about it.
– Do not believe anything because you are shown the written testimony of some ancient sage.
– Do not believe in what you have fancied, thinking that, because it is extraordinary, it must have been inspired by a god or other wonderful being.
– Do not believe anything merely because presumption is in its favor, or because the custom of many years inclines you to take it as true.
– Do not believe anything merely on the authority of your teachers and priests.
– But, whatever, after thorough investigation and reflection, you find to agree with reason and experience, as conducive to the good and benefit of one and all and of the world at large, accept only that as true, and shape your life in accordance with it.
The same test, said the Buddha, must be applied to his own teachings.
– Do not accept any doctrine from reverence, but first try it as gold is tried by fire.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.065.than.html
^ full sutta
" Trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it " - Buddha.
yep... the Kalama sutta is an elaboration of that theme" " Trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it " - Buddha. "
Sounds like good advice to me.
Sounds contradictory to me. Yin and Yang?I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.
Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context.
That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!
Sounds contradictory to me. Yin and Yang?
As far as the statement in red, I somewhat practice Taoism. Buddhism is too complex for me.
I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.
I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.
Kooky talk.
South Mexicans eat agave worms in their stews.
Didn't China invent noodles and fireworks.
What you wrote is what conquistadors wrote back to their financiers.
Many in Vietnam had never seen Paris.
Bruce Lee's impact on the world was immense and Bruce Lee's legacy
can still be seen everywhere.
He inspired an entire generation, on a global level, and his influence transcended martial arts.
Chuck Norris made a living from it.
Again, it appears that to be religious in Buddhism etc requires living like a Tibetan Monk.
The Golden Rule is an absolute fact of Karma.
If your Imam or Rabbi tell you how to think ... then maybe that's the foreign thing your reading into "Buddhist Philosophical Maxims"
I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.
Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context. When Hollywood stars claim to be practicing Buddhists, it always struck me as a little insincere and fake.
I decided quite a while ago that my life force is inextricably bound to and imbued with my life experience living in western culture. Whatever flaws I think religion has, my cultural touchstone is Eastern Orthodoxy.
That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. You would be amazed at how many message board dunces cling for years and decades to petty grudges and imaginary grievances. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!
to translate the philosophy to fit Chinese traditions
Yes, some 'cultures' don't have words for ideas from faraway places.
Like "outside-block" in Japanese is "Swan flaps wings away".
Gautama Buddha wrote very very very little himself.
Quote via google search:
The Buddha’s first teaching was the Four Noble Truths:
1. Suffering exists.
2. There is a cause of suffering.
3. There is a way to freedom from suffering.
4. The Noble Eightfold Path is the way to freedom from suffering.
Buddha never made a judgment about suffering being either bad or good. He simply said suffering exists in the human mind. Suffering is the first of the Four Noble Truths. Suffering is Noble. Without suffering, there could be no freedom from suffering, no way to freedom from suffering and no Noble Eightfold Path. So the existence of suffering is very important.
Without suffering we would never directly experience the truth that all suffering comes from our belief in and attachment to our thoughts, opinions, judgments and beliefs. This is a very important discovery. But we must discover this ourself. Understanding through the mind offers very limited help. So the various practices help us have the direct realization, which is the only true realization there can be. Mental knowing is extremely limited. Mental understanding cannot touch the truth of reality.
There is a universal "absolute" truth underlying ... Truth. So there are universal Truths that are ipso facto to all.
yes. Buddhism especially is concerned with the universal human condition.as I mentioned before there are even Buddhist /Christians (there was even a guy who called himself a Nicene Buddhist on our old DCJ board)I am just saying that one can try to employ some of the tenets of Buddha, Jesus, Confucius, Muhammad without claiming to be an actual practicing Christian, Buddhist, or Muslim. All those religious traditions have profound things to say on virtue, morality, and the human condition.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?103452-Confucius-Buddha-Jesus-and-Muhammad
No. While there are some small variations in dharma and practices in Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism the core beliefs and practices like the 4 Noble Truths and the 8 fold Noble path are universal to the human condition,I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.
Gere is a sincere Buddhist. I'm not all that familaier with his particulars but it looks like he's focused on bringing the rudimentary idea to western minds - Ithink?Well, to each their own.
I always found the Beatles promotion of the Hindu tradition of trancendental meditation and Richard Gere's promotion of Buddhism to be, if not insincere, then a little feigned.
It does not ring to me of true authenticity. The Hindu and Buddhist traditions evolved in antiquity and into the modern era to reflect the cultural norms, traditions, needs, and history of the peoples of South and East Asia. Not of Topeka, Kansas. And in each case, Buddhism absorbed local Asian religions and spiritual traditions creating a patchwork of specifically Asian spiritual practices.
When I see George Harrison, Keanu Reeves, and Richard Gere adopting and promoting Hindu and Buddhist traditions, I can't help but think this is a sanitized, secularized, and distorted version of those ancient religions that have been adopted or coopted by Hollywood hipsters.
absolutely wrong and parochial thinking. Buddhism has a lot of terminology, but I can't think of any that is only relevant to eastern or western culture. The human condition is universal.I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.
Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context. When Hollywood stars claim to be practicing Buddhists, it always struck me as a little insincere and fake.
I decided quite a while ago that my life force is inextricably bound to and imbued with my life experience living in western culture. Whatever flaws I think religion has, my cultural touchstone is Eastern Orthodoxy.
That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. You would be amazed at how many message board dunces cling for years and decades to petty grudges and imaginary grievances. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!