Dukkha is more than suffering.

Thank You, Gomer.

By presenting these Words of Wisdom, these Pearls before the Swine, ... they may Drink the Sweet Elixir of The Christ. Eternal Life is theirs.



that is not a Christian. Christians are the bride of Christ. The Bride of Christ does not commit fornication with post Christ false prophets. there are many. a "chaste virgin " has not touched the unclean things. wow ! who knew Bible is so adult yet innocent ? the only time I see people say the name of Jesus; it is done in mocking, scorning, blaspheming, denying , and mingling his Holiness with every manner of false gods/ idols. does an espoused virgin bride speak of her husband in that way ? no love there. false wife. divorce is correct for the fornication.
 
I know Dukkha will like it. (I think he calls it 'Karma' )
n Buddhism, the three marks of existence are three characteristics ; of all existence and beings, namely impermanence (anicca), unsatisfactoriness or suffering (dukkha), and non-self (anattā)
These three characteristics are mentioned in verses 277, 278 and 279 of the Dhammapada.
That humans are subject to delusion about the three marks, that this delusion results in suffering, and that removal of that delusion results in the end of suffering, is a central theme in the Buddhist Four Noble Truths and Noble Eightfold Path.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_marks_of_existence#Application
 
Kalama Sutta
The people of Kalama asked the Buddha who to believe out of all the ascetics, sages, venerables, and holy ones who, like himself, passed through their town.
They complained that they were confused by the many contradictions they discovered in what they heard.
The Kalama Sutta is the Buddha's reply.

– Do not believe anything on mere hearsay.
– Do not believe in traditions merely because they are old and have been handed down for many generations and in many places.
– Do not believe anything on account of rumors or because people talk a a great deal about it.
– Do not believe anything because you are shown the written testimony of some ancient sage.
– Do not believe in what you have fancied, thinking that, because it is extraordinary, it must have been inspired by a god or other wonderful being.
– Do not believe anything merely because presumption is in its favor, or because the custom of many years inclines you to take it as true.
– Do not believe anything merely on the authority of your teachers and priests.
– But, whatever, after thorough investigation and reflection, you find to agree with reason and experience, as conducive to the good and benefit of one and all and of the world at large, accept only that as true, and shape your life in accordance with it.

The same test, said the Buddha, must be applied to his own teachings.

– Do not accept any doctrine from reverence, but first try it as gold is tried by fire.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.065.than.html
^ full sutta
" Trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it " - Buddha.
 
what the hell do you want, jack ? you know I am a witness. I testify. it is my schtick. it is what I do. it is good.

Let's face it Gomer. You have been Sent by a Greater Power to bring The Word to those that Refuse to Listen. You are The Messenger.
 
" " Trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it " - Buddha. "
Sounds like good advice to me.



Kalama Sutta
The people of Kalama asked the Buddha who to believe out of all the ascetics, sages, venerables, and holy ones who, like himself, passed through their town.
They complained that they were confused by the many contradictions they discovered in what they heard.
The Kalama Sutta is the Buddha's reply.

– Do not believe anything on mere hearsay.
– Do not believe in traditions merely because they are old and have been handed down for many generations and in many places.
– Do not believe anything on account of rumors or because people talk a a great deal about it.
– Do not believe anything because you are shown the written testimony of some ancient sage.
– Do not believe in what you have fancied, thinking that, because it is extraordinary, it must have been inspired by a god or other wonderful being.
– Do not believe anything merely because presumption is in its favor, or because the custom of many years inclines you to take it as true.
– Do not believe anything merely on the authority of your teachers and priests.
– But, whatever, after thorough investigation and reflection, you find to agree with reason and experience, as conducive to the good and benefit of one and all and of the world at large, accept only that as true, and shape your life in accordance with it.

The same test, said the Buddha, must be applied to his own teachings.

– Do not accept any doctrine from reverence, but first try it as gold is tried by fire.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.065.than.html
^ full sutta
" Trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it " - Buddha.
 
I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.

Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context. When Hollywood stars claim to be practicing Buddhists, it always struck me as a little insincere and fake.

I decided quite a while ago that my life force is inextricably bound to and imbued with my life experience living in western culture. Whatever flaws I think religion has, my cultural touchstone is Eastern Orthodoxy.

That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. You would be amazed at how many message board dunces cling for years and decades to petty grudges and imaginary grievances. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!
 
I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.

Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness
really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context.

That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!
Sounds contradictory to me. Yin and Yang?
As far as the statement in red, I somewhat practice Taoism. Buddhism is too complex for me.
 
Sounds contradictory to me. Yin and Yang?
As far as the statement in red, I somewhat practice Taoism. Buddhism is too complex for me.

I am just saying that one can try to employ some of the tenets of Buddha, Jesus, Confucius, Muhammad without claiming to be an actual practicing Christian, Buddhist, or Muslim. All those religious traditions have profound things to say on virtue, morality, and the human condition.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?103452-Confucius-Buddha-Jesus-and-Muhammad

I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.
 
I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.

Kooky talk.

South Mexicans eat agave worms in their stews.

Didn't China invent noodles and fireworks.

What you wrote is what conquistadors wrote back to their financiers.

Many in Vietnam had never seen Paris.

Bruce Lee's impact on the world was immense and Bruce Lee's legacy
can still be seen everywhere.
He inspired an entire generation, on a global level, and his influence transcended martial arts.

Chuck Norris made a living from it.

Again, it appears that to be religious in Buddhism etc requires living like a Tibetan Monk.

The Golden Rule is an absolute fact of Karma.

If your Imam or Rabbi tell you how to think ... then maybe that's the foreign thing your reading into "Buddhist Philosophical Maxims"
 
America's Funniest Videos are

full of scenes of other people suffering.


I cheer when I see a Matador get gorged.

I cringe when a skateboarder grinds a rail and falls on his balls.

I wait 100's of laps for a nascar crash.

Like anyone thinks Free Health care will make people healthier?
 
I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.

Kooky talk.

South Mexicans eat agave worms in their stews.

Didn't China invent noodles and fireworks.

What you wrote is what conquistadors wrote back to their financiers.

Many in Vietnam had never seen Paris.

Bruce Lee's impact on the world was immense and Bruce Lee's legacy
can still be seen everywhere.
He inspired an entire generation, on a global level, and his influence transcended martial arts.

Chuck Norris made a living from it.

Again, it appears that to be religious in Buddhism etc requires living like a Tibetan Monk.

The Golden Rule is an absolute fact of Karma.

If your Imam or Rabbi tell you how to think ... then maybe that's the foreign thing your reading into "Buddhist Philosophical Maxims"

Call it kooky if you want. Those are not my opinions. Those are the impressions I got from courses I took on Hinduism and Buddhism from noted professors of theology and comparative religion. Even translating Buddhism from India to China required significant effort to translate the philosophy to fit Chinese traditions and culture, specifically by incorporating elements of taosim and Chinese cultural norms into a distinctly Chinese form of Buddhism. In all cases, the migration of Buddhism to other Asian countries required the assimilation of local religious and cultural tradition.

And that is just in Asia.

I strongly suspect the translation of Buddhism from India to Burma and Vietnam is an easier jump, than translating Buddhism to the cultures of London, Frankfurt, or Kansas City. And that is exactly because western culture, western thought, western philosophy, and western conventional norms are so alien to south and east Asian cultural traditions and thought patterns. Hindus do not even think about time in the same way that we in the west do. If one grew up in a conventional western culture with a conventional European heritage, I have my doubts that one could truly imbue themselves with the Buddhist philosophy practiced by devout native south and east Asians in anything other than a cursory sense.
 
I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.

Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context. When Hollywood stars claim to be practicing Buddhists, it always struck me as a little insincere and fake.

I decided quite a while ago that my life force is inextricably bound to and imbued with my life experience living in western culture. Whatever flaws I think religion has, my cultural touchstone is Eastern Orthodoxy.

That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. You would be amazed at how many message board dunces cling for years and decades to petty grudges and imaginary grievances. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!

"You would be amazed at how many message board dunces cling for years and decades to petty grudges and imaginary grievances. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!"
Jack: A few names do spring to mind. I wonder if these people are open to suggestion?
 
to translate the philosophy to fit Chinese traditions

Yes, some 'cultures' don't have words for ideas from faraway places.

Like "outside-block" in Japanese is "Swan flaps wings away".

Gautama Buddha wrote very very very little himself.

Quote via google search:
The Buddha’s first teaching was the Four Noble Truths:

1. Suffering exists.

2. There is a cause of suffering.

3. There is a way to freedom from suffering.

4. The Noble Eightfold Path is the way to freedom from suffering.

Buddha never made a judgment about suffering being either bad or good. He simply said suffering exists in the human mind. Suffering is the first of the Four Noble Truths. Suffering is Noble. Without suffering, there could be no freedom from suffering, no way to freedom from suffering and no Noble Eightfold Path. So the existence of suffering is very important.

Without suffering we would never directly experience the truth that all suffering comes from our belief in and attachment to our thoughts, opinions, judgments and beliefs. This is a very important discovery. But we must discover this ourself. Understanding through the mind offers very limited help. So the various practices help us have the direct realization, which is the only true realization there can be. Mental knowing is extremely limited. Mental understanding cannot touch the truth of reality.

There is a universal "absolute" truth underlying ... Truth. So there are universal Truths that are ipso facto to all.
 
Yes, some 'cultures' don't have words for ideas from faraway places.

Like "outside-block" in Japanese is "Swan flaps wings away".

Gautama Buddha wrote very very very little himself.

Quote via google search:
The Buddha’s first teaching was the Four Noble Truths:

1. Suffering exists.

2. There is a cause of suffering.

3. There is a way to freedom from suffering.

4. The Noble Eightfold Path is the way to freedom from suffering.

Buddha never made a judgment about suffering being either bad or good. He simply said suffering exists in the human mind. Suffering is the first of the Four Noble Truths. Suffering is Noble. Without suffering, there could be no freedom from suffering, no way to freedom from suffering and no Noble Eightfold Path. So the existence of suffering is very important.

Without suffering we would never directly experience the truth that all suffering comes from our belief in and attachment to our thoughts, opinions, judgments and beliefs. This is a very important discovery. But we must discover this ourself. Understanding through the mind offers very limited help. So the various practices help us have the direct realization, which is the only true realization there can be. Mental knowing is extremely limited. Mental understanding cannot touch the truth of reality.

There is a universal "absolute" truth underlying ... Truth. So there are universal Truths that are ipso facto to all.

Well, to each their own.

I always found the Beatles promotion of the Hindu tradition of trancendental meditation and Richard Gere's promotion of Buddhism to be, if not insincere, then a little feigned.

It does not ring to me of true authenticity. The Hindu and Buddhist traditions evolved in antiquity and into the modern era to reflect the cultural norms, traditions, needs, and history of the peoples of South and East Asia. Not of Topeka, Kansas. And in each case, Buddhism absorbed local Asian religions and spiritual traditions creating a patchwork of specifically Asian spiritual practices.

When I see George Harrison, Keanu Reeves, and Richard Gere adopting and promoting Hindu and Buddhist traditions, I can't help but think this is a sanitized, secularized, and distorted version of those ancient religions that have been adopted or coopted by Hollywood hipsters.
 
I am just saying that one can try to employ some of the tenets of Buddha, Jesus, Confucius, Muhammad without claiming to be an actual practicing Christian, Buddhist, or Muslim. All those religious traditions have profound things to say on virtue, morality, and the human condition.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?103452-Confucius-Buddha-Jesus-and-Muhammad
yes. Buddhism especially is concerned with the universal human condition.as I mentioned before there are even Buddhist /Christians (there was even a guy who called himself a Nicene Buddhist on our old DCJ board)

I think Buddhism and Hinduism have an ancient history that is specific to the cultures, politics, mindsets of south and east asian culture, and people who really have a stake in it, an affinity for it, most likely would be people who grew up with and are imbued with an Asian cultural identity and sensitivity.
No. While there are some small variations in dharma and practices in Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism the core beliefs and practices like the 4 Noble Truths and the 8 fold Noble path are universal to the human condition,
and are what Buddha taught. Most oral teaching were written down in the Pali Cannon as well.
The suttas (oral lessons) are excellent covering different aspects.
Buddha taught the people a practical Path; still true 2500 years later

Sure there are cultural difference, and the role of bodhisattva, but the religion is much the same practice anywhere
 
Last edited:
Well, to each their own.

I always found the Beatles promotion of the Hindu tradition of trancendental meditation and Richard Gere's promotion of Buddhism to be, if not insincere, then a little feigned.

It does not ring to me of true authenticity. The Hindu and Buddhist traditions evolved in antiquity and into the modern era to reflect the cultural norms, traditions, needs, and history of the peoples of South and East Asia. Not of Topeka, Kansas. And in each case, Buddhism absorbed local Asian religions and spiritual traditions creating a patchwork of specifically Asian spiritual practices.

When I see George Harrison, Keanu Reeves, and Richard Gere adopting and promoting Hindu and Buddhist traditions, I can't help but think this is a sanitized, secularized, and distorted version of those ancient religions that have been adopted or coopted by Hollywood hipsters.
Gere is a sincere Buddhist. I'm not all that familaier with his particulars but it looks like he's focused on bringing the rudimentary idea to western minds - Ithink?

The (Beatles) Guru Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was limited to TM ( transendental meditation) which wasn't much more the practicing to quiet the Monkey Mind/ He wasn 't much of a teacher other then that -he was in it for the fame.

But he had a profound and lasting effect of George especially. George never did declare his religion -
it was mostly Hindu and I think he believed in the self reincarnation ( unlike Buddhism),
But his religion was sincere, and became a comfort to him as he aged and suffered after he was stabbed when an intruder broke into his estate.

So the old selfish Guru did make a lasting contribution to George at least. TM is good if incomplete as well
 
I have come to the conclusion that any conventional westerner of European decent trying to adopt Buddhism as their own personal religion are pretty much kidding themselves.

Those eastern religions are so alien to our western sensibilities that I do not believe there is anyway to realistically adopt them as our own personal philosophy. To understand the Buddhist or Hindu way of life really requires one to be born into an Asian culture, to live and breathe it, to be imbued with it. To really grasp and adopt the concepts of no-self and emptiness really requires a lifetime of being immersed in an Asian context. When Hollywood stars claim to be practicing Buddhists, it always struck me as a little insincere and fake.

I decided quite a while ago that my life force is inextricably bound to and imbued with my life experience living in western culture. Whatever flaws I think religion has, my cultural touchstone is Eastern Orthodoxy.

That said, I do not begrudge anyone for attempting to employ some of the tenets of Buddhist philosophy. The idea of impermanence and the concept of letting go of material attachments and conditioned states that cause suffering are practices that any human being could benefit from. You would be amazed at how many message board dunces cling for years and decades to petty grudges and imaginary grievances. Those dupes could really benefit from a little Buddhist philosophy!
absolutely wrong and parochial thinking. Buddhism has a lot of terminology, but I can't think of any that is only relevant to eastern or western culture. The human condition is universal.
anyone interested can start off online with BuddhNet https://www.buddhanet.net/
~~
There are a myriad of sites. or read a book about the life of Siddhartha and his enlightenment
for understanding why he wound up with Buddhism as an answer to suffering after trying the life of Asceticism
(a lifestyle characterized by abstinence from sensual pleasures, often for the purpose of pursuing spiritual goals.)
~~

My very favorite is a page turner by Deepak Chopra "Life of Buddha" so well written it draws you into his life.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/319604.Buddha
Bestselling author Deepak Chopra brings the Buddha back to life in this gripping novel of the young prince who abandoned his inheritance to discover his true calling. This iconic journey changed the world forever, and the truths revealed continue to influence every corner of the globe today.

A young man in line for the throne is trapped in his father's kingdom and yearns for the outside world.
Betrayed by those closest to him, Siddhartha abandons his palace and princely title. Alone and face-to-face with his demons, he becomes a wandering monk and embarks on a spiritual fast that carries him to the brink of death. Ultimately recognizing his inability to conquer his body and mind by sheer will, Siddhartha transcends his physical pain and achieves enlightenment.

Although we recognize Buddha today as an icon of peace and serenity, his life story was a tumultuous and spellbinding affair filled with love and sex, murder and loss, struggle and surrender. From the rocky terrain of the material world to the summit of the spiritual one, Buddha captivates and inspires—ultimately leading us closer to understanding the true nature of life and our selves.

41FTDhoq5FL._SR600%2C315_PIWhiteStrip%2CBottomLeft%2C0%2C35_PIStarRatingFOURANDHALF%2CBottomLeft%2C360%2C-6_SR600%2C315_ZA(403%20Reviews)%2C445%2C291%2C400%2C400%2Carial%2C12%2C4%2C0%2C0%2C5_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
 
Back
Top