Teflon Don
I'm back baby
This thread provides some textbook examples of why threadbanning is not only desirable, but mandatory in some cases.
I concur
This thread provides some textbook examples of why threadbanning is not only desirable, but mandatory in some cases.
This thread provides some textbook examples of why threadbanning is not only desirable, but mandatory in some cases.
I concur
You sound like my cunt exwife,it's not about being right!
It's about winning a debate,even if you're dead wrong!
Hey Mason, speaking about your cunt ex-wife ... have you seen Yaya around lately?
Are you Legina's sock? Every time Legina posts, you pop up and say "I agree!".
(shaking head) You thread ban 50 Posters on a Politics Forum. Why do you even bother coming here?
No I am not Legions sock
Anyone with reading comprehension skills above first grade can discern that we have very different writing/posting styles
I have gone through this many times before but I will humor you.
I have three accounts here
I Love America - commonly known as ILA. This was my first account
Teflon Don - this was inspired by Grind calling me Teflon after numerous failed attempts at getting me banned by board liberals
Butthurt Yurt - this is a throw away that was created when we played Werewolf and used anonymous names. I change this one often but use it rarely
Happy?
Does it matter whether its 5 or 50? Why even start a thread if you're going to ban people?(shaking head) You thread ban 50 Posters on a Politics Forum. Why do you even bother coming here?
Why do you care how many people he thread bans?
How does it materially harm you?
Have you ever thought that his (and my) extensive thread ban lists say more about those being thread banned than the person doing the thread banning?
Is your issue with the mere act of thread banning or the number?
What number of thread bans is acceptable to you?
Some on the left have extensive thread ban lists. Why do you not call them out?
Does it matter whether its 5 or 50? Why even start a thread if you're going to ban people?
Just have an "ignore list" and actually ignore the ones you are afraid of....
Anyone with a thread ban....You'll have to direct that to Teflon Don/Legina.
Thank you TD. You've told me that previously and it sounded authentic, sincere, and truthful. But, ... really ... are you Legina;'s sock?
Does it matter whether its 5 or 50? Why even start a thread if you're going to ban people?
Just have an "ignore list" and actually ignore the ones you are afraid of....
Thank you for your interest, I'll try and answer.
1. "Why do you care how many people he thread bans?"
Jack: Why come to a Forum if you ban half the people?
2. "How does it materially harm you?"
Jack: It harms me in no way.
3. "Have you ever thought that his (and my) extensive thread ban lists say more about those being thread banned than the person doing the thread banning?"
Jack: No. Just the opposite. I find it quite peculiar to thread ban half the Forum. Humorous actually.
4. "Is your issue with the mere act of thread banning or the number?"
Jack: The 'number' is the MOST peculiar.
5. "What number of thread bans is acceptable to you?"
Jack: hahaha ... Zero for me, but I don't have a problem with people 'threadbanning' others.
6. "Some on the left have extensive thread ban lists. Why do you not call them out?"
Jack: I have not seen 50 Posters banned from threads other than YOU and Legina.
People come to these forums for a number of reasons. I can’t speak for Legion but I will be happy to tell you why I do it
I have been coming to these types of forums for man years. After all that time, I have come to the conclusion that 99.99999% of participants are not really interested in civilized debate.
Additionally, I have determine that after arguing with thousands of libtards about issues ranging from abortion to taxes, they are not going to say anything new or that I haven’t heard before.
Sometimes I start a thread posting news I find interesting, but am not interested in what libtards think about it and really don’t need to discuss it. So I thread ban
The irony is that the overwhelming majority of threads that I start are in APP where I thread ban nobody. What I find interesting is that the same people who whine and bitch about my thread bans don’t participate in the threads I start there.
That is why I don’t take complaints about my thread bans seriously.
I will let Comrade Legion speak for himself
Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
Thank you for your interest, I'll try and answer.
1. "Why do you care how many people he thread bans?"
Jack: Why come to a Forum if you ban half the people?
2. "How does it materially harm you?"
Jack: It harms me in no way.
3. "Have you ever thought that his (and my) extensive thread ban lists say more about those being thread banned than the person doing the thread banning?"
Jack: No. Just the opposite. I find it quite peculiar to thread ban half the Forum. Humorous actually.
4. "Is your issue with the mere act of thread banning or the number?"
Jack: The 'number' is the MOST peculiar.
5. "What number of thread bans is acceptable to you?"
Jack: hahaha ... Zero for me, but I don't have a problem with people 'threadbanning' others.
6. "Some on the left have extensive thread ban lists. Why do you not call them out?"
Jack: I have not seen 50 Posters banned from threads other than YOU and Legina.
1. "I have been coming to these types of forums for man years. After all that time, I have come to the conclusion that 99.99999% of participants are not really interested in civilized debate."
Jack: I agree, most people have already made up their minds and no matter what is said, will still believe what they originally believed.
2. "Additionally, I have determine that after arguing with thousands of libtards about issues ranging from abortion to taxes, they are not going to say anything new or that I haven’t heard before."
Jack: That's probably true.
3. "Sometimes I start a thread posting news I find interesting, but am not interested in what libtards think about it and really don’t need to discuss it. So I thread ban"
Jack: I can only speak for myself, when I see a 'Legina thread', I ignore it because it's just a 'shout out' that no one can respond to. Why should I bother reading it?
4. "The irony is that the overwhelming majority of threads that I start are in APP where I thread ban nobody."
Jack: I tried to respond to one of your posts there, but was unable to post, so like the 'threadbanning', when I see 'APP', I ignore it because I'm unable to post/respond there.
5. "What I find interesting is that the same people who whine and bitch about my thread bans don’t participate in the threads I start there."
Jack: I don't think 'people are whining about your thread bans'. I think they are mocking people that come to a Politics Forum, only to talk to themselves.
6. "I will let Comrade Legion speak for himself"
Jack: Somehow, I think it will be similar to yours.
So a couple of things
1) if you would like to post in APP all you have to do is request permission from the Mods. This is an added step they have employed to ensure that people have read APP rules and acknowledge the increased moderation. It is not an onerous task
2) as for whether Legion will agree, he just may well.
3) Clearly you think he and I are the same person so there is nothing I can do about it. It doesn’t hurt me, so carry on
4) Have you considered that Legion is fucking with you guys and trying to make you think that? He does like to troll people.
Either way. I am finished addressing this topic
Why even start a thread if you're going to ban people?