Eric Trump and Kimberly Guilfoyle's phone records subpoenaed by January 6 committee

How the new focus on Ivanka Trump and Jan. 6 will expose dark MAGA truths

The letter adds:

We are particularly interested in discussions inside the White House and with the President before and after his 2:24 p.m. tweet. Testimony obtained by the Select Committee indicates that members of the White House staff requested your assistance on multiple occasions to intervene in an attempt to persuade President Trump to address the ongoing lawlessness and violence on Capitol Hill.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/01/21/ivanka-trump-jan-6-committee-expose-maga-truths/
 
Sure, that's the plan. Isn't it funny that none of Trump's Treasonous Terrorists never condemn Pedo Don for being so fucking stupid that the idiotic Democrats stole the election from him?

Trump always claims he has the best people, is the best leader and that he's the move effective President ever yet look at all the things he fucked up: COVID, vaccines and the election. Just to name domestic issues.

The mewling idiots on the Trump Kamp can blame Biden for the economy all they want but the entire planet is hurting because of the pandemic.

If our leaders had been smarter in late 2019, maybe the US could have stopped a lot of this. History will not smile on US leadership in the early part of the 21st century. First Iraq and now 2016-2020.
trump's biggest failure was due to his Obama envy. He set out to destroy everything that Obama created, as if he could remove Barack from history.

Obama had 150 doctors and scientists around the world to help other nations avoid a pandemic exactly like Covid.

trump disbanded this collection of scholars, bringing dozens home from China before the pandemic.

 
trump's biggest failure was due to his Obama envy. He set out to destroy everything that Obama created, as if he could remove Barack from history.

Obama had 150 doctors and scientists around the world to help other nations avoid a pandemic exactly like Covid.

trump disbanded this collection of scholars, bringing dozens home from China before the pandemic.


Agreed, but think about this: Trump will be more famous (infamous) than Obama by a long shot IMO. Obama will be remembered as "the first black President" and the ACA/Obamacare. About two paragraphs in a High School history book....providing future educators are allowed to say Obama was "black".

What Trump did will take up a couple of pages. Not just the acts and crimes themselves, but global reactions and the response of our nation to pick a path toward authoritarianism or freedom.
 
Agreed, but think about this: Trump will be more famous (infamous) than Obama by a long shot IMO. Obama will be remembered as "the first black President" and the ACA/Obamacare. About two paragraphs in a High School history book....providing future educators are allowed to say Obama was "black".

What Trump did will take up a couple of pages. Not just the acts and crimes themselves, but global reactions and the response of our nation to pick a path toward authoritarianism or freedom.
Agree that it should be that way. Is Nixon's crime wave even in history books? Watergate? I was under the impression that he isn't.
 
Agree that it should be that way. Is Nixon's crime wave even in history books? Watergate? I was under the impression that he isn't.

Watergate was a significant turning point in American politics. Nixon faced prison and many of his underlings did go to jail. I doubt Trump will be so lucky and am pretty certain his crimes will cost him significantly.

Nixon helped his reputation with China. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nixon-announces-visit-to-communist-china
 
Watergate was a significant turning point in American politics. Nixon faced prison and many of his underlings did go to jail. I doubt Trump will be so lucky and am pretty certain his crimes will cost him significantly.

Nixon helped his reputation with China. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nixon-announces-visit-to-communist-china
I don't disagree, but with Republicans trying to remove slavery from history classes, I can only imagine that trump will be remembered as the best POTUS in the history of the nation ;).

History books, at least for public school, tend to be pretty vague.
 
I don't disagree, but with Republicans trying to remove slavery from history classes, I can only imagine that trump will be remembered as the best POTUS in the history of the nation ;).

History books, at least for public school, tend to be pretty vague.

That won't happen.

They hit high points. To avoid politics, they try to keep current events vague, but if Trump ends up in prison or the victim of militia assassination, it's worth talking about.
 
I don't disagree, but with Republicans trying to remove slavery from history classes, I can only imagine that trump will be remembered as the best POTUS in the history of the nation ;).

History books, at least for public school, tend to be pretty vague.


No one is trying to remove slavery from history books. That has always been taught. The "white privilege" stuff hasn't. because it's a farce.

There were black slaveowners, Indians owned slaves too. There were white Irish slaves.

Inconvenient facts for the pushers of critical race theory.

They had in-depth Florida history when I was in high school. That was a good class!
 
No one is trying to remove slavery from history books. That has always been taught. The "white privilege" stuff hasn't. because it's a farce.

There were black slaveowners, Indians owned slaves too. There were white Irish slaves.

Inconvenient facts for the pushers of critical race theory.

They had in-depth Florida history when I was in high school. That was a good class!
Similar to the white supremacists in Washington, you choose to mischaracterize the 1619 project that will be introduced into some school curriculums.

This issue predates the project. Not surprising is that Texas is always at the center of school textbook controversies.


https://www.prindlepost.org/2016/05/removing-slavery-textbooks/
[h=1]Removing Slavery from Textbooks[/h][FONT=&quot]-

May 2, 2016[/FONT]


Earlier this academic year, Roni Dean-Burren, a Houston mother, posted on Facebook in response to a passage in her ninth-grade son’s history book, which referred to slaves—not as slaves—but as “workers” and “immigrants.” The post went viral, influencing the publisher “to apologize, correct the caption and offer — free of charge — either stickers to cover it up or corrected copies of the book to schools that want to replace their old ones.” They did not issue a recall of the misleading, erroneous books.
 
Similar to the white supremacists in Washington, you choose to mischaracterize the 1619 project that will be introduced into some school curriculums.

This issue predates the project. Not surprising is that Texas is always at the center of school textbook controversies.


https://www.prindlepost.org/2016/05/removing-slavery-textbooks/
Removing Slavery from Textbooks

-

May 2, 2016
Shove your commie propaganda right up your ass.

Any school system that allows 1619 project material does the children in it a disservice.
 
Similar to the white supremacists in Washington, you choose to mischaracterize the 1619 project that will be introduced into some school curriculums.

This issue predates the project. Not surprising is that Texas is always at the center of school textbook controversies.


https://www.prindlepost.org/2016/05/removing-slavery-textbooks/
[h=1]Removing Slavery from Textbooks[/h][FONT="]-

May 2, 2016[/FONT]

That's because Matt Dillon is a racist, dictator-supporting liar and a welcher.
 
Shove your commie propaganda right up your ass.

Any school system that allows 1619 project material does the children in it a disservice.

Why? What are your objections to it, Matt? Can you give three reasons why I should agree with you about it?
 
Why? What are your objections to it, Matt? Can you give three reasons why I should agree with you about it?


1) It lies by omission

2) It is divisive and racist

3) It has no place in lower education whatsoever, and its place in higher education is dubious at best.
 
Shove your commie propaganda right up your ass.

Any school system that allows 1619 project material does the children in it a disservice.
Nazis hate the truth. I can tell by your sig, even though the original 'snowflakes' were white supremacists.
 
Why? What are your objections to it, Matt? Can you give three reasons why I should agree with you about it?
Even between some of the crafters there is mild disagreement.

The project looks to illustrate the first shipment of slaves to the U.S in 1619 as the nation's founding. I believe that aspect was removed.

Notice Lil' Hitler ignored the piece that predates the project?
 
1) It lies by omission

2) It is divisive and racist

3) It has no place in lower education whatsoever, and its place in higher education is dubious at best.

1) What is being omitted?

2) Why is it divisive and racist?

3) Since you can't explain #1 and #2, how can I agree with you on its place in education?

https://pulitzercenter.org/lesson-plan-grouping/1619-project-curriculum
The 1619 Project, inaugurated with a special issue of The New York Times Magazine, challenges us to reframe U.S. history by marking the year when the first enslaved Africans arrived on Virginia soil as our nation's foundational date. Here you will find reading guides, activities, and other resources to bring The 1619 Project into your classroom. Wondering where to start? Dive into our Reading Guide.
 
Back
Top