OrnotBitwise
Watermelon
Dude! Where you been?We've been having this discussion at the school of journalism for weeks. Here's my view:
Yes. It's worth mentioning. It should not, and has not in this case, been in the lede of the story. It should not be the focus. But leaving it out I think is to shirk a journalist's job of reporting the facts.
The NY Times didn't mention it until day two, and it was half way through a very long story.
It's Cable that made it into a big deal, and you idiots gave them the ratings they wanted. So congratulations.
So yeah, it should be mentioned. It should not be given much importance.
Basically, I think I agree with you. Facts are simply data points: it's not easy to decide at the time which are going to be significant and any attempt to do so corrupts the process. And it has been the cable news outlets that have blown these things way out of all proportion.