Basically, there were a lot of homos around two million years ago.
Some of them are still around, in the Pacific Northwest.
Basically, there were a lot of homos around two million years ago.
quite possibly what happened
You are confusing evolution and speciation.
can you give me a single example today where evolution occurred anywhere on a multi-regional basis?.....
and you consider them unrelated?......
you ignore this......it is significant......answer it.....
......I love it when you talk all "sciencey"......
Some of them are still around, in the Pacific Northwest.
Of course not. Are you ever going to answer the question, coward?
You first. Explain how you think speciation is supposed to occur. You have been asked through several threads and you just continue to try to change the subject.
accurate accounts of a 115000 year old event passed orally or a complete break from one species to another within a single generation.
not true....as I said, it happens in isolation.....where one strain of a creature breeds apart from the general population......
meanwhile there are two questions you've been running from......
one, an example of multi-regional evolution......
two.....if homo-erectus evolved multi-regionally, why did they all end up in Africa whether it be 115k or 65k years ago?.......
???...why would either be impossible?......
does a member of one species suddenly give birth to a new species as you had previously indicated?
If you understand that it is among a group
I can give you a long list of species that are evolving across a wide range of regions.
On your question 2... what are you talking about? Fossils of homo erectus older than 115000 have been found outside of Africa. Again, the recent find is of a 2 million year old skull in the country of Georgia.
I have not run from any of your questions.
Arguing that the Noah story passed accurately for 115000 years is exponentially more crazy than arguing the accuracy of tales about Robin Hood or King Arthur. It's a fable or myth and even with Ussher's dating a rational person does not treat it as a historical event. It's even stranger that you do when you also argue that it's inaccurate on key points.
???....as I indicated what.....a member of a species gives birth to an offspring that either is identical to the rest of the species or has a variation of some type.....if the offspring survives it may pass that variation on to its offspring or the variation may die off.....
groups don't have an offspring....a couple does.....or is a village raising your child?.....
can you give me ONE species that evolved in more than one region?.......
so basically, it is impossible simply because you don't believe it to be possible......and you say I am at fault for claiming it inaccurate because it couldn't possibly be accurate....../grins.....