Evolution controversy erupts

PostmodernProphet said:
sweet....then you should have no problem answering it.......try......domesticated animals are not a good example of random evolution.......
Click to expand...

Already answered. You are moving the goalposts now. Your question is/was stupid and irrelevant. If you understand that speciation happens within a group and not to one individual then there is no reason to fail to understand how the entire population could evolve into forms distinct from the archaic forms.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
it totally effected the world of both the survivors and those who didn't.......if a flood happens and there's no one to hear it, does it make a sound?......
Click to expand...

Your attempts at being clever just make you look more foolish.

The point here was that the worldwide nature of the biblical flood is very significant to the tale. You claimed otherwise. Your response is without substance.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Already answered. You are moving the goalposts now. Your question is/was stupid and irrelevant. If you understand that speciation happens within a group and not to one individual then there is no reason to fail to understand how the entire population could evolve into forms distinct from the archaic forms.
Click to expand...

Wrong again Baxter. All present day forms of life are exactly the same as they were when Noah loaded them on the ark. some have gone extinct, such as nearly all the dinosaurs and so we don't see them today.

Your stupidity is in the fact that you continue to argue about it Baxter, but that's something you are too immature to understand.
 
monty1 said:
Wrong again Baxter. All present day forms of life are exactly the same as they were when Noah loaded them on the ark. some have gone extinct, such as nearly all the dinosaurs and so we don't see them today.

Your stupidity is in the fact that you continue to argue about it Baxter, but that's something you are too immature to understand.
Click to expand...

What do you care if I enjoy beating my head on this wall. He may eventually learn something and if he does not then others may. But I do it because I enjoy exploring my own ideas and writing. That's the only rational reason to be on a site like this.
 
Professor Baxter said:
What do you care if I enjoy beating my head on this wall. He may eventually learn something and if he does not then others may. But I do it because I enjoy exploring my own ideas and writing. That's the only rational reason to be on a site like this.
Click to expand...

Not a problem Baxter, I'll just check in once in a while to laugh at you and add my truths. Beat your head on the wall all you like. PMP will be pleased to hear that's what you think you're doing.
 
monty1 said:
Not a problem Baxter, I'll just check in once in a while to laugh at you and add my truths. Beat your head on the wall all you like. PMP will be pleased to hear that's what you think you're doing.
Click to expand...

What else do you think the point is in a site like this? You continue to comment about our discussions. Has it changed anything? Frankly what you seem to want to talk about(other posters on this site and their posting habits) is far less fascinating than evolution and the Bible. Take your own advice, dull troll.
 
Last edited:
There's nothing wrong with my 'sight'.

And even though you consider yourself a professor, I've never seen anything new of fascinating about anything you've said. Read a few of Richard Dawkins' books and you may learn something that is of interest to people other than kristyuns.

In case you don't understand, kristyuns function on faith and you're never going to crack into that. But you'll spend 50 or more pages trying for some reason. What is that reason faux professor? An ego trip to impress dull mutts who are mostly convinced that they are kristyuns of varying degrees?
 
Professor Baxter said:
If that is what you meant then wtf is your problem understanding how evolution occurs within an entire population?
Click to expand...

because quite obviously it doesn't......
What happens is a group becomes genetically isolated from the entire population of the species
Click to expand...

as you yourself admit, it happens within a smaller segment that is isolated from the entire population......it changes from what the entire population was and becomes what the entire population is not.....and that does not happen identically in multiple locations.....different things happen within different areas of isolation......

I have given you several examples including humans.
Click to expand...
humans dispersed from the area of isolation in which they existed....they did not simultaneously appear in multiple locations.....and they took their domesticated animals along with them.....

now, can you give me a true example of multi-regional evolution........

perhaps a unique form of beetle found in both Africa and South America?.....
 
Last edited:
Professor Baxter said:
One good source is all I am requesting. Do you have one? What you offered is from some idiots with an agenda.
Click to expand...

the source accurately reported a variety of such stories.....if you dislike his you are free to examine others....I'm sure you would find fault with any I propose, since your objection has nothing at all to do with merit.....
 
monty1 said:
There's nothing wrong with my 'sight'.

And even though you consider yourself a professor, I've never seen anything new of fascinating about anything you've said. Read a few of Richard Dawkins' books and you may learn something that is of interest to people other than kristyuns.

In case you don't understand, kristyuns function on faith and you're never going to crack into that. But you'll spend 50 or more pages trying for some reason. What is that reason faux professor? An ego trip to impress dull mutts who are mostly convinced that they are kristyuns of varying degrees?
Click to expand...

It should have been site. Tablet and autocorrect. It was clear in context.

The professor name is based on the Roger character from American Dad. Wow, you are surprisingly dense.

I have read many of Dawkins' books.

There is no reason pmp can't learn what the theory is whether he operates on faith or not. Right now he is just foolishly arguing against a strawman because he is too lazy or dishonest to understand the actual theory.

Again if you think you are doing something with your boring pointers then you are mistaken. You are wasting your time as much or more than I am. At least I am discussing a topic of interest. You are just talking about my and pmp's personalities. You are a very dull troll.
 
Professor Baxter said:
because he is too lazy or dishonest to understand the actual theory.
Click to expand...

I think I have demonstrated I understand the theory better than you do.....your problem is you have never stopped to think about the practical consequences of what you believe and the inherent contradictions that result......
 
Professor Baxter said:
It should have been site. Tablet and autocorrect. It was clear in context.

The professor name is based on the Roger character from American Dad. Wow, you are surprisingly dense.

I have read many of Dawkins' books.

There is no reason pmp can't learn what the theory is whether he operates on faith or not. Right now he is just foolishly arguing against a strawman because he is too lazy or dishonest to understand the actual theory.

Again if you think you are doing something with your boring pointers then you are mistaken. You are wasting your time as much or more than I am. At least I am discussing a topic of interest. You are just talking about my and pmp's personalities. You are a very dull troll.
Click to expand...

And you're too worried and preoccupied with what 'I' say. So that's encouragement to continue to help PMP make his points which you struggle with so much.
 
one contradiction that you have yet to address......you believe that modern humans evolved in multiple locations around the world.....yet, whether it be 115k or 65k years ago, science tells us that all of modern humanity dispersed out of Africa.....why did they all travel to Africa before dispersing back to these multiple locations you believe they evolved in?..........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I think I have demonstrated I understand the theory better than you do.....your problem is you have never stopped to think about the practical consequences of what you believe and the inherent contradictions that result......
Click to expand...

Such as???

You are an idiot that previously and repeatedly claimed speciation occurred when a homo erectus suddenly gave birth to a homo sapien. It's not clear that you REALLY get how it works. If you understand, then you must just be dishonest in presenting it as you have.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Such as???

You are an idiot that previously and repeatedly claimed speciation occurred when a homo erectus suddenly gave birth to a homo sapien. It's not clear that you REALLY get how it works. If you understand, then you must just be dishonest in presenting it as you have.
Click to expand...

well, for one thing, you believe that humans evolved in multiple locations even though examining the scientific evidence of evolution it becomes obvious that nothing ever evolved in more than one location.....

or another, the question you keep refusing to even reference......see post #157.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top