Evolution controversy erupts

PostmodernProphet said:
one contradiction that you have yet to address......you believe that modern humans evolved in multiple locations around the world.....yet, whether it be 115k or 65k years ago, science tells us that all of modern humanity dispersed out of Africa.....why did they all travel to Africa before dispersing back to these multiple locations you believe they evolved in?..........
Click to expand...

Again, this is so filled with errors I don't know what you are talking about or where to begin. You are confusing various facts. The oldest homo sapien fossils are 195,000 years old. There are Fossils in South Africa from 115000 years ago. And one theory has it that they spread throughout Asia 65000 years ago. If you want to polish this turd of a question and present it again then I will do my best to answer. But you do need to understand that I am NOT suggesting that the multiregional hypothesis is the correct one. I am merely saying it is quite possible. The replacement theory seems to have more support.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
because quite obviously it doesn't......


as you yourself admit, it happens within a smaller segment that is isolated from the entire population......it changes from what the entire population was and becomes what the entire population is not.....and that does not happen identically in multiple locations.....different things happen within different areas of isolation......


humans dispersed from the area of isolation in which they existed....they did not simultaneously appear in multiple locations.....and they took their domesticated animals along with them.....

now, can you give me a true example of multi-regional evolution........

perhaps a unique form of beetle found in both Africa and South America?.....
Click to expand...

Evolution absolutely can happen within an entire population to the extent that a new species different from the archaic form appears. We are very different than the earliest homo sapiens.

I have given you an example of mutliregional evolution. If you want to change your question then do so. But you will need to restate it in a way that makes my previous answer unacceptable and explain why they should be.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the source accurately reported a variety of such stories.....if you dislike his you are free to examine others....I'm sure you would find fault with any I propose, since your objection has nothing at all to do with merit.....
Click to expand...

Any objective source will do. I am not interested in proving your point. Myth's are not good sources of history. Story tellers borrow from each other and so it's not surprising that one culture might have a myth similar to that of another, anyway.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
well, for one thing, you believe that humans evolved in multiple locations even though examining the scientific evidence of evolution it becomes obvious that nothing ever evolved in more than one location.....

or another, the question you keep refusing to even reference......see post #157.....
Click to expand...

I don't necessarily accept the multiregional hypothesis. IT DOES REMAIN POSSIBLE and it is absolutely certain that we have evolved in multiple locations. You don't know what you are talking about and you are mixing up terms.

157 has been dealt with multiple times. You are very confused and I have tried to help you clarify your question but I can't answer such a misinformed question.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol....hardly......homo sapiens occurred when God created them.......no homo erectus ever gave birth to a homo sapien......
Click to expand...

And yet you accept evolution. Sure you do.

I am not asking for the silly fairytale in which you believe. I am asking you to explain what you believe the theory of evolution suggests. You are either very ignorant of the theory or very dishonest in your representation of it.
 
Professor Baxter said:
157 has been dealt with multiple times. You are very confused and I have tried to help you clarify your question but I can't answer such a misinformed question.
Click to expand...

lol....you have dealt with it simply by saying I am confused....what is it you think I have wrong about your silly opinions?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
stating it doesn't tell me why you think so....tell me why......
Click to expand...

What I stated does tell you why it is important. It is a key to God's covenant, the later sermons by Christ and prophesies of the second coming. Honestly, you need to do some very basic Bible study (maybe start with elementary school math, science, vocabulary and punctuation) and come back when you are up to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top