Evolution Is In Trouble - Detailed - Why So Many Scientist Are Saying So

[ZenMode]

It also is not science.

Biology is a science.

What is common sense? Is it learned or inherent?

Common sense is a broad concept. As it relates to the Bible or religion in general, common sense would mean that you don't believe in magical sky wizards with no evidence to support that belief.

The broader application of common sense is adjusting your level of belief to align with available evidence.

 

[Tobytone]

You really should be careful about translations of languages. The '4th day' does NOT necessarily mean a 24-hour day.

In general, words translate, idioms do not.

There is no word for 'day' in Hebrew. The analogous word they use essentially means 'period', but is also used to refer to the 24-hour day. The period is UNSPECIFIED. It can be ANY LENGTH OF TIME. Even millennia can be a 'day'.

The age of the Earth is unknown.

Darwin did not discuss cells at all.

The Theory of Abiogenesis is a religion. The Theory of Creation is a religion. The Theory of the Big Bang is a religion. The Theory of Evolution is a religion. The Theory of the Continuum is a religion.

Darwin created NONE of these theories.

There is no Magick Decay Rate from the formation of the Earth.

At this point I am convinced that you have no idea what science is. You have so far confused science with engineering and again with religion.

I've had some sleep now, and now would like to sincerely thank you for you comments. Keep fighting the good fight.

 

[IBDaMann]

On a side note, I always find it confusing when people are quoting the Bible while talking about common sense.

What did you think of my Bible quotes? Were they appropriate?

 

[ZenMode]

What did you think of my Bible quotes? Were they appropriate?

The Thessalonians quote was fine, but not because it came from the Bible, nor did it contain any amazing insight that couldn't come from any other book, philosopher or, really, most any moderately educated human being.

The other quote is ridiculous because it makes reference to a god.

 

[IBDaMann]

The Thessalonians quote was fine, but not because it came from the Bible, nor did it contain any amazing insight that couldn't come from any other book, philosopher or, really, most any moderately educated human being.

What I'm reading is that my quote was totally appropriate.

The other quote is ridiculous because it makes reference to a god.

Now if you take that quote in context of the material to which I was responding, how does it fare?