Tobytone
Verified User
Save me a copy, I need another toilet book. lolThen you explain to me why I couldn't write a book about some god I've claimed to see and interact with, and claim that the evidence of that god is the very book I wrote?
Save me a copy, I need another toilet book. lolThen you explain to me why I couldn't write a book about some god I've claimed to see and interact with, and claim that the evidence of that god is the very book I wrote?
Again, be careful I'm quite sure that @Daylight63 claims to have attended a college too. He seemed pretty sure it should help. lolMissing comma.
Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'real' means.
RQAA.
RQAA
Not a fault.
You cannot use science as a proof, Sybil.
I agree. Your post is a lot of gobbledygook.
Science doesn't care whether any god or gods exist or not. It is completely atheistic. Science has no proofs.
Redefinition fallacy (evidence<->proof).
Again, be careful I'm quite sure that @Daylight63 claims to have attended a college too. He seemed pretty sure it should help. lol
Again, be careful I'm quite sure that @Daylight63 claims to have attended a college too. He seemed pretty sure it should help. lol
Yo, I haven't the time to read more scintillating comments from an educated libtard. I'm watching the best President we've ever had make another great speech.Weren't you going to spin me some tall tale you had queued up about how you know about sediment settling rates? LOL.
You sent it to Tobytone.It was an example highlighting ZenMode's error. Ignore it if you wish.
No, it was a pivot.Yes. It was an example.
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.Exactly.
Yo, I haven't the time to read more scintillating comments from an educated libtard. I'm watching the best President we've ever had make another great speech.
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED
Enjoy the show!Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed
Agreed, and thorough as usual. I expect nobody will bother trying to disprove any of those comments. If they do, I'll enjoy watching.
Doesn't scare me at all. I know the crap a lot of colleges teach these days. I ain't pretty.This should be fun. LOL Be careful I think he's been to college.
A random phrase. No apparent coherency. Try to stay on topic, Dimlight.Weren't you going to spin me some tall tale you had queued up about how you know about sediment settling rates? LOL.
Random phrases. No apparent coherency. Try to stay on topic, Dimlight.LOL. Don't worry about it. I knew you were just spinnin' a tale. I knew you wouldn't follow through. LOL.
Buzzword fallacy. There is no such thing as 'sedimentology'. Why can't you keep up with the conversation?? Why these random pivots?Says the guy who seriously knows NOTHING about sedimentology.
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTEDLOL. Don't worry about it. I knew you were just spinnin' a tale. I knew you wouldn't follow through. LOL.
You didn't say genetic mutation. You said "mutation theory".Why thank you, I'll point to the over 1000 scientists that say "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life." That's a nice way of saying, the theory is shit. lol
I find your derogatory remark towards 'non-scientists' to be a quintessential manifestation of unwarranted hubris from a crassly obstinate, cerebrally overtaxed individual. Incidentally, I've moved on to more pertinent matters this day. It's quite the hectic period on the final day of liberal hegemony, and such a sublime juncture draws nigh. I'd be elated to revisit any impertinently audacious comments you might leave on this matter post-celebration. LOL. Do keep those shears concealed, lest you resemble a fool with a tonsured pate. Merely a conjecture.
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTEDYou didn't say genetic mutation. You said "mutation theory".
I can only respond to the words you write.
"mutation theory, idea that new species are formed from the sudden and unexpected emergence of alterations in their defining traits....De Vries held that new species arrive suddenly and without prior precedent through the process of mutation, which he considered to be the change of one species into another..."
Mutation theory | Genetics, Evolution & Mutagenesis | Britannica
Mutation theory, idea that new species are formed from the sudden and unexpected emergence of alterations in their defining traits. Advanced at the beginning of the 20th century by Dutch botanist and geneticist Hugo de Vries in his Die Mutationstheorie (1901–03; The Mutation Theory), mutationwww.britannica.com
I've never heard of the modern NeoDarwinian synthesis referred to as "mutation theory". Modern evolutionary biology is a synthesis of natural selection, gene mutation, gene flow, and genetic drift.
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED
What you're doing is the same shit Christians constantly try to pull: I know the Bible is true because the Bible says it is true."Mantra 30a. It is. A circular argument by itself is not a fallacy.
YOU made a circular argument fallacy. You are trying to prove a circular argument True.
LOL are you frustrated today? I've responded with more detail than I've seen in the 'ideas' from all the libtards combined. I'm fine with that.It's kinda fun watching you do what you, no doubt, assume is clever. You make a claim about evolution or geology and then someone comes on to correct you and you run away.
Don't you have faith in your convictions????? Why can't you defend what you say?
The Bible does not say whether it's true. It claims to be the word of God. It is a series of books written by various prophets of God.What you're doing is the same shit Christians constantly try to pull: I know the Bible is true because the Bible says it is true."
...YOU'RE the one trying to put words in people's mouths.Yah, sorry, you're not dragging me into another one of your rabbit holes of nonsense.
...for all the good it does him.LOL are you frustrated today? I've responded with more detail than I've seen in the 'ideas' from all the libtards combined. I'm fine with that.
Plus, It's a busy day for me, watching the greatest moment in political history take place before our eyes. Even libtards can understand that. right? Regardless, let me give you the response you love so much.
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED