Evolution Is In Trouble - Detailed - Why So Many Scientist Are Saying So

Missing comma.
Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'real' means.

RQAA.

RQAA

Not a fault.

You cannot use science as a proof, Sybil.

I agree. Your post is a lot of gobbledygook.

Science doesn't care whether any god or gods exist or not. It is completely atheistic. Science has no proofs.
Redefinition fallacy (evidence<->proof).
Again, be careful I'm quite sure that @Daylight63 claims to have attended a college too. He seemed pretty sure it should help. lol
 
Weren't you going to spin me some tall tale you had queued up about how you know about sediment settling rates? LOL.
Yo, I haven't the time to read more scintillating comments from an educated libtard. I'm watching the best President we've ever had make another great speech.

YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED
 
Yo, I haven't the time to read more scintillating comments from an educated libtard. I'm watching the best President we've ever had make another great speech.

YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED

LOL. Don't worry about it. I knew you were just spinnin' a tale. I knew you wouldn't follow through. LOL.
 
Why thank you, I'll point to the over 1000 scientists that say "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life." That's a nice way of saying, the theory is shit. lol

I find your derogatory remark towards 'non-scientists' to be a quintessential manifestation of unwarranted hubris from a crassly obstinate, cerebrally overtaxed individual. Incidentally, I've moved on to more pertinent matters this day. It's quite the hectic period on the final day of liberal hegemony, and such a sublime juncture draws nigh. I'd be elated to revisit any impertinently audacious comments you might leave on this matter post-celebration. LOL. Do keep those shears concealed, lest you resemble a fool with a tonsured pate. Merely a conjecture.
You didn't say genetic mutation. You said "mutation theory".
I can only respond to the words you write.


"mutation theory, idea that new species are formed from the sudden and unexpected emergence of alterations in their defining traits....De Vries held that new species arrive suddenly and without prior precedent through the process of mutation, which he considered to be the change of one species into another..."



I've never heard of the modern NeoDarwinian synthesis referred to as "mutation theory". Modern evolutionary biology is a synthesis of natural selection, gene mutation, gene flow, and genetic drift.
 
Last edited:
You didn't say genetic mutation. You said "mutation theory".
I can only respond to the words you write.


"mutation theory, idea that new species are formed from the sudden and unexpected emergence of alterations in their defining traits....De Vries held that new species arrive suddenly and without prior precedent through the process of mutation, which he considered to be the change of one species into another..."



I've never heard of the modern NeoDarwinian synthesis referred to as "mutation theory". Modern evolutionary biology is a synthesis of natural selection, gene mutation, gene flow, and genetic drift.
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED
 
YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED

It's kinda fun watching you do what you, no doubt, assume is clever. You make a claim about evolution or geology and then someone comes on to correct you and you run away.

Don't you have faith in your convictions????? Why can't you defend what you say?
 
Mantra 30a. It is. A circular argument by itself is not a fallacy.
YOU made a circular argument fallacy. You are trying to prove a circular argument True.
What you're doing is the same shit Christians constantly try to pull: I know the Bible is true because the Bible says it is true."

Yah, sorry, you're not dragging me into another one of your rabbit holes of nonsense.
 
It's kinda fun watching you do what you, no doubt, assume is clever. You make a claim about evolution or geology and then someone comes on to correct you and you run away.

Don't you have faith in your convictions????? Why can't you defend what you say?
LOL are you frustrated today? I've responded with more detail than I've seen in the 'ideas' from all the libtards combined. I'm fine with that.

Plus, It's a busy day for me, watching the greatest moment in political history take place before our eyes. Even libtards can understand that. right? Regardless, let me give you the response you love so much.

YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED
 
What you're doing is the same shit Christians constantly try to pull: I know the Bible is true because the Bible says it is true."
The Bible does not say whether it's true. It claims to be the word of God. It is a series of books written by various prophets of God.
Yah, sorry, you're not dragging me into another one of your rabbit holes of nonsense.
...YOU'RE the one trying to put words in people's mouths.
 
LOL are you frustrated today? I've responded with more detail than I've seen in the 'ideas' from all the libtards combined. I'm fine with that.

Plus, It's a busy day for me, watching the greatest moment in political history take place before our eyes. Even libtards can understand that. right? Regardless, let me give you the response you love so much.

YOUR CONCERNS ARE NOTED
...for all the good it does him. :grin:
 
Back
Top