Fact: Same sex unions are way inferior to heterosexual unions

Obama wasn't good for the economy. I can't admit it because it isn't true, n-lover.

Well we disagree with that. But I'm saying Obama was terrible on foreign policy. So obviously, I'm not an NPC for him, like you are for Trump.
 
Well we disagree with that. But I'm saying Obama was terrible on foreign policy. So obviously, I'm not an NPC for him, like you are for Trump.

Lots of you lefties didn't like his foreign policy although it was primarily centered around kissing the asses of foreign leaders. You like puckering up like he did. N-L
 
Lots of you lefties didn't like his foreign policy although it was primarily centered around kissing the asses of foreign leaders. You like puckering up like he did. N-L

That doesn't make sense. If I like puckering up, then how come I'm saying I don't like what he supposedly did?
 
I don't want to get into this because you're using it as a distraction.

So would you agree that states' rights, building the wall, and deporting illegals are generally Republican ideas?

You don't want to address this "distraction" because it destroys your position.
 
I know several married lesbians and they seem happy and stable to me. I don't associate with gay males so I can't say anything about that.

My theory about gay men is that they turn gay because they can't find a woman as perverted as they are. My theory on gay women is that they have only been exposed to men who are assholes, perverts, immature, violent or unstable.

Personally, I am a real stickler on the point that gay/lesbian relations (ie, "civil unions") are NOT marriages, by definition, and because of that, I refuse to redefine the term marriage.

Marriage is the sacred union between a man and a woman, in which the two separate bodies join together into a single body (in spirit). If one is to believe in Christianity, Christianity believes that this union models the relationship between Jesus Christ (the "husband") and The Church (the "bride"). But even at a secular level, the child itself is an embodiment of this very definition of marriage, as the DNA of two separate bodies (the parents) joins together into a single body (the child).

Given that, I refuse to recognize a civil union as a marriage (ie, redefine the word marriage). They are two completely different things, as only heterosexual couples are able to procreate in principle.
 
#deflection.


So would you agree that states' rights, building the wall, and deporting illegals are generally Republican ideas?

That was stated in post 55. But what you don't want to discuss is your claim that prioritizing immigration from Europe is a GOP prerogative, because it's not.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/

What about heterosexual couples who are choosing not to have children?

Your argument is so stupid.

Choosing not to have children does not alter the definition of marriage. The definition of marriage refers to the ability to procreate in principle, not the ability or desire to procreate in actuality. In my experiences of discussing this topic, people very often conflate 'actuality' with 'principle'.

Gay/Lesbian unions are NOT marriages, nor can they ever be, by definition, since gays/lesbians cannot procreate in principle.
 
When were heterosexual marriages demonized, against the law and not recognized by the justice system and the courts? A date or particular case will do. And bi-racial marriage was an entirely different issue, btw.

"Heterosexual marriage" is redundant terminology. A marriage is ALWAYS about a heterosexual couple. There is no such thing as a "homosexual marriage". Those relations are called "civil unions".
 
Sure I do. I believe in states' rights, freedom of association, deportation of all illegal immigrants, and limiting immigration to European countries.
No you don't, liar... You reject damn near the entirety of the US Constitution, as I've shown in past correspondence with you.
 
Why do rightys care about other people's sex lives and why do they want to control them?
I could give two farts less...

God makes some people gay. He always has.
No he doesn't.

You do not have to get involved in their acting as they were made. Gays are none of your business. Run along. Do your hateful things but leave gays alone. You cannot change them.
My beef is about the attempt to redefine the word 'marriage'. That's where I draw the line.
 
That we even exist is thanks to exclusively heterosexual unions which is the very factual evidence that proves beyond any shadow of doubt that homosexual unions or any other kind of union doesn't even come close to comparing to heterosexual unions. Heterosexual unions stand alone.

If it were up to homosexual unions to sustain the human race, we would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective imbeciles and where is there any honour in that?!!

To this day not one person (I have even been in contact with tens of thousands of elected appointed and designated officials of almost 200 countries on several occasions in recent years on this very subject) has contested with even so much as a shred of validity the fact that thousands of years since created marriage honours the one sexual union to which we all owe our existence and that one and only sexual unions are exclusively heterosexual unions again as thousands of years already proves beyond any shadow of doubt.

I say federal conservatives need to dump their sick lie supporting liberally retarded leader and LGBT lies and deceptions need to be removed from schools and legislation for the well being and sanity of current and future generations. Never give up the fight on marriage until marriage is permanently restored to a respectable state far from the sick filthy and soon to be short lived mockery that the LGBT has made of it. Scheer wants to lie for these sickos, shame, get rid of him and the sooner the better I say.

Oh and pride parade such sick liars call their sickly disgusting and offensive parade that yet not one of these sick and filthy liars gives one reason to be proud of a man humping a man or a woman humping a woman which is yet another fine example of the sick and filthy liars the LGBT proves to be.

I'll never quit until the is destroyed permanently and globally and my pleasure to be here for the well being and sanity of current and future generations.

To you homosexuals / lesbians dumb enough to support the LGBT, according to LGBT logic, you being homosexual male born with a penis describes you for having sex with a woman aka born with a vagina with her vagina ripped out of her body. You being lesbian born with a vagina means you have sex with those born with a penis aka male surgically mutilated and stuffed inside a cut next to his anus.

Time for you to grow up. Officials even considering forcing lies through legislation reveals how incompetent they are let alone allowing such sick and filthy lies ad deceptions to pass through legislation and into schools is shameful, sick, offensive and inexcusable. There is no excuse for such sick behavior.

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thehouse/a-parade-of-critics-how-andrew-scheer-s-views-on-same-sex-marriage-still-divide-his-own-party-1.5368295

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada

Your conclusion would have been more plausible if it had been born of personal experience. As it is now we see just another hate-filled worthless scream of pain.
 
Your conclusion would have been more plausible if it had been born of personal experience. As it is now we see just another hate-filled worthless scream of pain.

No one is born homosexual. Saying you were is nothing more than an excuse put forth by those so ashamed of the choice they made they aren't willing to admit it.
 
Back
Top