Fact: Same sex unions are way inferior to heterosexual unions

[jimmymccready]

Fact: David Spetch is a notorious homophobia and horrible racist.

 

[StoneByStone]

No you don't, liar... You reject damn near the entirety of the US Constitution, as I've shown in past correspondence with you.

No, I don't reject muh constitution. I just don't care what muh constitution says. I'm sure there is plenty in there that I agree with, but to me, it doesn't matter what it says. All that matters is that an idea is logical.

 

[StoneByStone]

That was stated in post 55. But what you don't want to discuss is your claim that prioritizing immigration from Europe is a GOP prerogative, because it's not.

Ok, it's not.
What about the other things? Are those Republican ideas?

 

[MAGA MAN]

Ok, it's not.
What about the other things? Are those Republican ideas?

That was stated in post 55.

 

[StoneByStone]

That was stated in post 55.

Apology accepted.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Apology accepted.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

it's sad that all you got are lies.

when homos are pretending to be something they are not to try and rob heteros of what we are, my pleasure to walk all over such rubbish and your poor choice of words are certainly not mine.

Sorry about your pathological cock and ass lust, princess.

 

[Nordberg]

So DJS must have enjoyed lots of both kinds of sex to be qualified to make that conclusion. I would never want to think he is standing outside and judging those who were born differently than he.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

No one is born homosexual. Saying you were is nothing more than an excuse put forth by those so ashamed of the choice they made they aren't willing to admit it.

Can you give us a source other then the original poster,that says people aren't born gay.THX

 

[Judy Johnstone]

Fact: David Spetch is a notorious homophobia and horrible racist.

You think he might be a closet case,like VP Pence?
Outraged by homosexuality with semen on their breath?

 

[jimmymccready]

David may be a true believer in his own evil, John K Jones.

 

[CFM]

Can you give us a source other then the original poster,that says people aren't born gay.THX

Since homos claim they were born that way, perhaps you should ask one of them to provide a source other than their "because I said so" argument to prove they were born gay.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

Since homos claim they were born that way, perhaps you should ask one of them to provide a source other than their "because I said so" argument to prove they were born gay.

So you were assuming.

 

[CFM]

So you were assuming.

No assumptions at all. Homos claim they were born that way, let them prove it. "Because I said so" isn't proof.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

No assumptions at all. Homos claim they were born that way, let them prove it. "Because I said so" isn't proof.

You're assuming.You're also painting all gays with the same brush.

 

[CFM]

You're assuming.You're also painting all gays with the same brush.

Don't have to assume when the facts are there.

No, faggots paint themselves with the same brush.

 

[Nordberg]

I could give two farts less...


No he doesn't.


My beef is about the attempt to redefine the word 'marriage'. That's where I draw the line.

No change in the definition at all. You are wrong. Marriage was always a legal and binding act. Get a divorce and the courts will make that lesson clear. You do not have to get married in a church and tehre sure as hell isn't any religion in the divorce. Marriage in the old days was about cementing alliances and merging wealthy families.
Exactly how does that exclude gays?

 

[gfm7175]

No change in the definition at all.

[1] union between one man and one woman... ...
[2] union between one adult and another adult, regardless of sex... ...

Man & woman [1] ≠ man & man or woman & woman [2]... The definition has been changed.

You are wrong.

No, I am quite right, per the proof of identity.

Marriage was always a legal and binding act. Get a divorce and the courts will make that lesson clear.

While it was always meant to be a binding act, it has not always been a legal act.

You do not have to get married in a church and tehre sure as hell isn't any religion in the divorce.

Correct, it is not necessary to get married in a church.

Marriage in the old days was about cementing alliances and merging wealthy families.

??? the fuck??? Marriage is about a male and a female becoming one body, as it has always been about. In fact, a child itself is the physical embodiment of this purpose.

Exactly how does that exclude gays?

Gays are unable to procreate in principle.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Can you give us a source other then the original poster,that says people aren't born gay.THX

Whenever someone claims that humans are not "born gay," it's helpful to ask them to pinpoint the time in their lives when they decided to be straight.

 

[Judy Johnstone]

Whenever someone claims that humans are not "born gay," it's helpful to ask them to pinpoint the time in their lives when they decided to be straight.

Being Straight isn't all it's cracked up to be!