Fauci warns US could see more than 100,000 deaths

archives said:
Sure sounds like a prediction to me;

"The U.S. government’s foremost infection disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, says the U.S. will certainly have “millions of cases” of COVID-19 and more than 100,000 deaths."
Click to expand...

It's OUT of CONTEXT you dumb fucks! :rolleyes:

TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
 
floridafan said:
Drs Fauci and Brit are now idiots in your eyes???
Click to expand...

tRump "Lie Promotor" will end most of his incoherent posts with the word "moron" or some other trump like slam. With as much as he licks tRUMPS wringled nuts, this "ass clown" better buy his tongue condoms by the case.......)
 
archives said:
Sure sounds like a prediction to me;

"The U.S. government’s foremost infection disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, says the U.S. will certainly have “millions of cases” of COVID-19 and more than 100,000 deaths."
Click to expand...

You folks have spun up tRumps favorite "rim licker" again. I believe that he is teetering toward a melt down.
 
Tacomaman said:
tRump "Lie Promotor" will end most of his incoherent posts with the word "moron" or some other trump like slam. With as much as he licks tRUMPS wringled nuts, this "ass clown" better buy his tongue condoms by the case.......)
Click to expand...

TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
 
Tacomaman said:
You folks have spun up tRumps favorite "rim licker" again. I believe that he is teetering toward a melt down.
Click to expand...

TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
 
floridafan said:
Oh yes, both he and Dr Blix. Spin that, honey pot.
Click to expand...

You can't post without lying can you dumbass?

TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
 
archives said:
How does one take "I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases" out of context? It is what the guy said, "I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases"
Click to expand...

TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
 
Truth Detector said:
TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
Click to expand...

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases
 
Truth Detector said:
TAPPER: Well, Dr. Birx said yesterday, as you know, that she doesn't think any city will be spared from this virus.
How many cases do you think the U.S. will reach? A million cases, 10 million cases? Or are these -- we -- or do we not even have any idea?

FAUCI: You know, Jake, the honest -- to be honest with you, we don't really have any firm idea.

There are things called models. And when someone creates a model, they put in various assumptions. And the model is only as good and as accurate as your assumptions. And whenever the modelers come in, they give a worst-case scenario and a best-case scenario.

Generally, the reality is somewhere in the middle. I have never seen a model of the diseases that I have dealt where the worst-case scenario actually came out. They always overshoot.

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

So, it's difficult to present.

I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases. But I don't want to be held to that, because it's -- excuse me -- deaths. I mean, we're going to have millions of cases.

But I -- I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.

What we do know, Jake, is that we got a serious problem in New York, we have a serious problem in New Orleans, and we're going to be developing serious problems in other areas.

So, although people like to model it, let's just look at the data of what we have, and not worry about these worst-case and best-case scenarios.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2003/29/sotu.01.html
Click to expand...

Oh, I got it now, saying "I don't want to be held to that" means he didn't say it, Fauci adding "I don't want to be held to that" means he never said "looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases," perfect, only in "anything but the truth's" reality
 
floridafan said:
I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases
Click to expand...

You are missing "anything but the truth's" logic here, he's selling that because the Fauci added "but I don't want to be held to that" means the Doctor never said "looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases," strange logic, but it is "anything but the truth," probably going to get either the personal insults or corny copy and pastes next
 
floridafan said:
I mean, looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases
Click to expand...

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

But I don't want to be held to that

I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.
 
archives said:
You are missing "anything but the truth's" logic here, he's selling that because the Fauci added "but I don't want to be held to that" means the Doctor never said "looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases," strange logic, but it is "anything but the truth," probably going to get either the personal insults or corny copy and pastes next
Click to expand...

So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

But I don't want to be held to that

I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.
 
Truth Detector said:
So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

But I don't want to be held to that

I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.
Click to expand...

Ah, now it's changed, if you phara phrase what Fauci said and leave out the "looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases" it means he didn't say never said, as I note, always entertaining
 
Truth Detector said:
So, when you use numbers like a million, a million-and-a-half, two million, that almost certainly is off the chart. Now, it's not impossible, but very, very unlikely.

But I don't want to be held to that

I just don't think that we really need to make a projection, when it's such a moving target, that you can so easily be wrong and mislead people.
Click to expand...

Tell us again how the common flu is much more dangerous, that it was a Democratic plot to ruin Trumps reelection. Tell us why weeks ago, Trump told the world that if you needed a test you could get a test. Possibly you need a list of every trump lie on this subject since January???? Its your fucking kind who are the danger to humanity. I also noted that you didn't post the comments of Dr Blix. That is what you call cherry picking.
 
archives said:
You are missing "anything but the truth's" logic here, he's selling that because the Fauci added "but I don't want to be held to that" means the Doctor never said "looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases," strange logic, but it is "anything but the truth," probably going to get either the personal insults or corny copy and pastes next
Click to expand...

Keep spinning! you are like a fucking toy that never stops.
 
archives said:
Ah, now it's changed, if you phara phrase what Fauci said and leave out the "looking at what we're seeing now, I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 cases" it means he didn't say never said, as I note, always entertaining
Click to expand...

Still flailing and lying I see. Poor dumbass; you have your head shoved so far up your ass you can't see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top