Federal takeover overdue

Althea said:
Stop nitpicking, by using Right Wing talking points. So tell us...when did Georgia lie? When they recounted twice and found no errors, or when they rammed through massive voter suppression tactics?
Click to expand...

tell us why there should not be an in depth investigation of the events seen in the videos of the counting process......why hasn't the woman with blond braids been placed under oath to testify?.....
 
A partial solution to what is being done is making election day a federal holiday.

That would eliminate many of the election day issues with long lines and limited time to vote in person (unless you don't work).
 
NiftyNiblick said:
A federal takeover of elections is not only a good idea, but an absolute imperative given the voter suppression efforts in the backwater red states.

I can't imagine why any sane person would object.

Frankly, I don't believe that many of them do.
Click to expand...


Not a takeover


National mandatory base rules


Having 50 elections makes it much harder to steal a national election


Nixon would have loved a national election he could have stolen in one swing


National base rules and regulations to keep a state from cheating their state voters like republicans have provably done for decades



Cold hard USA court documented fact
 
Whythink said:
A partial solution to what is being done is making election day a federal holiday.

That would eliminate many of the election day issues with long lines and limited time to vote in person (unless you don't work).
Click to expand...

The long lines are caused by state republicans


They are long on purpose

It’s always in the Democratic area


Notice when you see those lines you will see lots of brown and black people
 
Whythink said:
A partial solution to what is being done is making election day a federal holiday.

That would eliminate many of the election day issues with long lines and limited time to vote in person (unless you don't work).
Click to expand...
That helps, but the issue is the number of polling places that are being cut in Blue districts of Red states. Same for reduced polling hours, and reduced drop boxes.
 
Althea said:
Voter fraud is rare. In the last election, trump benefitted from the few incidences.
Click to expand...

This is a whole raft of logical fallacies.

First, most voter fraud is perpetrated by Democrats. That is factual and proven.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
https://www.heritage.org/election-i...-swells-1285-proven-cases-voter-fraud-america

So, that gets the implication you end with out of the way.

As for fraud itself, it happens and happens regularly.
Yes, most--virtually all--cases are small and rarely affect the outcome of an election. In a few cases it has.
We know how most fraud is perpetrated and can speculate on additional methods that are clearly plausible in the correct conditions.

What the Democrats want with HR 1 and SR 1 is to make conditions under which voter fraud could become more widespread and common because these bills set the known conditions for that.

Therefore, your Appeal to probability fallacy fails entirely to make a valid case. HR 1 and SR 1 should be opposed.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
A federal takeover of elections is not only a good idea, but an absolute imperative given the voter suppression efforts in the backwater red states.

I can't imagine why any sane person would object.

Frankly, I don't believe that many of them do.
Click to expand...


Especially for President, the election is national and not by state.
 
anonymoose said:
I actually agree but I don't see how the R's and D's could possible agree on how it should be done.
There should be some sort of standardization for nationwide elections.
A good start is to get rid of mail in ballots
Click to expand...


Mail in ballots are safe. No evidence of widespread fraud. Many states have been doing it for years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top