that's a double standard that really needs to be dealt with. Had the roles been reversed and a girl/woman touched a man on the ass like that, he'd be forced to deal with it or be harassed and laughed at for reporting it.I'll bet any money his dad told him to do that. The kid needs to be taught that you don't touch anybody's private parts without permission.
that's a double standard that really needs to be dealt with. Had the roles been reversed and a girl/woman touched a man on the ass like that, he'd be forced to deal with it or be harassed and laughed at for reporting it.
I agree that men shouldn't be sexually harassed. If a man was harassed and laughed at for reporting it, he would be in the same position as women who report their assaults.that's a double standard that really needs to be dealt with. Had the roles been reversed and a girl/woman touched a man on the ass like that, he'd be forced to deal with it or be harassed and laughed at for reporting it.
Shut up, dummy.She's known for double standards.
If a man was harassed and laughed at for reporting it, he would be in the same position as women who report their assaults.
If a man grabbed another man's junk there would be more outrage than if a woman did the same.
So you say. Got any examples?
Chances are, a man touched by another man would be dealt with privately on the spot. If you know what I mean...that's a double standard that really needs to be dealt with. Had the roles been reversed and a girl/woman touched a man on the ass like that, he'd be forced to deal with it or be harassed and laughed at for reporting it.
In a discussion, the claimant bears the burden of proof for their own assertions. This principle is rooted in logic.
- Often referred to as "onus probandi," this principle states that the person making an assertion has the responsibility to provide evidence or proof for that assertion. It's a foundational concept in critical thinking, where one does not have to disprove an unsubstantiated claim; rather, the person making the claim must support it.
- In debates or general discourse, if someone makes a claim, they are expected to back it up with facts, data, or logical reasoning. If they fail to do so, others are not obliged to accept the claim as true simply because it has been stated.
@Grok
"When Maxwell Davis, 26, entered D.C. gay bar Cobalt for the first time in 2005, he found his genitals almost immediately up for grabs.Chances are, a man touched by another man would be dealt with privately on the spot. If you know what I mean...
First-person accounts."Stories".
"When Maxwell Davis, 26, entered D.C. gay bar Cobalt for the first time in 2005, he found his genitals almost immediately up for grabs.
Davis, who is straight, had hit the bar with a few of his colleagues, and was waiting for one of his female co-workers outside the club’s restrooms when the groper approached. “Guy walks right up to me and grabs my crotch,” he says. “Just reached out and grabbed my junk.”
The grope caught Davis off guard. “I was too stunned to punch him, so I just sort of turned my back, like ‘Holy shit.’” Davis says. Then, “I sort of turn around again, like, wait a second—-shouldn’t I be doing something?” When Davis turned, the groper confronted him first: “I have a hotel room,” he whispered into Davis’ ear. “Want to come play with me? I’ll pay you.”
When Davis finally mustered a reply—-“flattered, but straight”—-the groper informed him that he had no business being in a gay bar in the first place. To the man groping the crotches of strangers, Davis was the one who had broken the rules."
And you doubt them why?So they say.
Did you believe it when Tara Reade "said?""Davis says".