Fluke for Congress
- Thread starter Big Money
- Start date
Sometimes thats the case....DNA is not found in ALL rape cases, but of course, if its available, its usually foolproof evidence.
Maybe the rapist denies ever have seen or been near the victim.
The DNA could be the type of evidence that only proves your proximity of being with or near the victim is proven, and your testimony is a lie....
christiefan915
Catalyst
Don't play word games with me, you incredibly stupid and vicious moron. Go back and read your posts. You made it about infidelity, not me, and you compounded your lie by saying I pretended it was okay. You have no credibility whatsoever and the more you post, the more you prove it.
#107 "Newt was massacred for his infidelity and lost his job as Speaker and left the House in disgrace.
Yet here you are defending the dunce Clinton and pretending that infidelity is okay, but only if you're a Democrat."
What rape conviction you incredibly stupid dunce???
What we are saying is that the DNA is irrelevant if not for the lies under oath and obstruction of justice shit-for-brains.
This wasn't a case regarding the extremely POOR judgment of a sitting President, although he should have resigned, it was a case about lying and obstruction.
Dunce.
I'm not you incredibly dense buffoon; I am trying to lead a jackass to water; but in your case it is proving impossible.
"It" meaning impeachment ?......the impeachment was about 'perjury', lying under oath, obstruction.....anything else was evidence to prove that perjury, lying under oath and
obstruction had occurred....and there was evidence independent of the dress or how the evidence on the dress got there.....
stains on a dress and blow jobs are not illegal....and the stains did not prove a blow job....Clinton and/or Monica could have claimed other scenarios for the stain.....that
was up to them to manufacture a story.
Without the obstruction of justice and lying under oath, there would not have been a case...do you deny that?
Dunce.
You wanna see word games, try reading mm's posts.
Incidently...." "Newt was massacred for his infidelity and lost his job as Speaker and left the House in disgrace." is a true statement as it stands....
if the words "lost his job because of that" were included, you might have a point ....
christiefan915
Catalyst
Isn't that precious. Can't take back your original post so deflect, deflect, deflect.
You were caught in a big fat lie. Own it, you scumbag.
Tap dancing aside...what parts didn't you understand ?
"It" meaning impeachment ?......the impeachment was about 'perjury', lying under oath, obstruction.....anything else was evidence to prove that perjury, lying under oath and
obstruction had occurred....and there was evidence independent of the dress or how the evidence on the dress got there.....
stains on a dress and blow jobs are not illegal....and the stains did not prove a blow job....Clinton and/or Monica could have claimed other scenarios for the stain.....that
was up to them to manufacture a story.
The blue dress and the blow job were evidence...nothing more, nothing less....evidence, but not the only evidence...just the most damning and undeniable evidence.
The impeachment charges did not mention the blue dress or the blow job...it would be nice to see you 'man up' for a change.
Spinning aside, you're still too stupid to comprehend the facts on why Clinton was impeached in the House. But that is because you are an incredibly ignorant low IQ dunce stuck on hyper partisan stupid.
How can we expect anything less than dishonest blather?
Dismissed Comrade Commander Dimwit.
Wrong again shit-for-brains; I am trying to lead a jackass to water; but in your case it is proving impossible.
Leftists read, but cannot comprehend which is why they are such gullible dunces who can be fed talking points and will parrot them infinitum regardless of reality, the truth or the facts.
It's always best to just point at them and say "look, an idiot" while laughing. Otherwise they attempt to drag you down to their low IQ level and try to beat you with experience.
christiefan915
Catalyst
You'd be better served to move on from my comments because you're just embarrassing yourself now.
I answered a very specific post of yours where you claimed I "defended Clinton and pretended his infidelity was okay" when I never said that anywhere about anyone's infidelity.
Now you're trying to cover your lie by pretending I need instruction about perjury and you're the one to teach it.
Your idiot lie was exposed, you fool. Take your phony self-righteousness and stick it where the sun don't shine.
maineman
Banned
the impeachment charges did not need to mention those things, but they would have been infinitely less credible without them.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
I don't know about that but it sure is a crying shame your mother couldn't aford birth control.
This is the same person that could not afford her own birth control pills and is now able to afford to run a major political campaign???
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Not only does she have a vagina....but she has this thing no conservative redneck male has. It's called "A Brain"!
maineman
Banned
except that the "massacre for his infidelity happened subsequent to his loss of the speakership... so the "truth" of the first statement clearly stands alongside its misleading irrelevance.
Kinda like if a democrat tried to pin Iran-Contra on Reagan's Alzheimer's.... like, maybe saying this:
"Reagan was debilitated by Alzheimer's and lost a lot of credibility after it turned out he had lied during Iran Contra."