Ford F150 v Toyota Tundra

Except I haven't been proven wrong. Mercedes and other makers with inline engines sell very few cars in the US compared to other makers who use V6 engines. And, in a rear wheel drive car, it's a lot easier to distribute the weight of a V engine towards the rear axle then an inline engine with the same number of cylinders. :)
 
DamnYankee said:
Except I haven't been proven wrong. Mercedes and other makers with inline engines sell very few cars in the US compared to other makers who use V6 engines. And, in a rear wheel drive car, it's a lot easier to distribute the weight of a V engine towards the rear axle then an inline engine with the same number of cylinders. :)
Click to expand...


Seems to work fine to me.
 
Think of how much better it would be with a V6.

Again, before you railed against foreign cars and here you admit that you bought one. What's up with that?
 
It's hilarious that when Mercedes makes a performance car under their AMG badge they rely exclusively on V style engines, yet Dune trumps an inline 6 on his grocery-getter car attributing to "awesome weight distribution", and V6 engines in general as an "idiotic design". :)
 
DamnYankee said:
Think of how much better it would be with a V6.

Again, before you railed against foreign cars and here you admit that you bought one. What's up with that?
Click to expand...

V-6 engines suck. It wouldn't be better with a V-6. I bought it because it had an inline 6.
 
DamnYankee said:
Think of how much better it would be with a V6.

Again, before you railed against foreign cars and here you admit that you bought one. What's up with that?
Click to expand...

I railed against someone buying a new foreign car.
If I bought a new car, it would be a Volt. (GM)
 
Return of Dune said:
V-6 engines suck. It wouldn't be better with a V-6. I bought it because it had an inline 6.
Click to expand...
And here we go back to the beginning: V6 engines "suck", because you say they do. The only difference now verses earlier is that you have a mountain of evidence that disproves your claim. :)
 
Return of Dune said:
I railed against someone buying a new foreign car.
If I bought a new car, it would be a Volt. (GM)
Click to expand...

Like there is a difference between buying new verses used. :palm:

Talk about a shitty car, here we have the Chevy Volt. Why do you want taxpayers to subsidize your shitty car?
 
There is a huge difference, moron. If you buy something new, you are affecting commerce in whatever country the item is made in. Not so with a used purchase.
 
That's untrue. If no one bought used Mercedes cars, the market value of new ones would be much lower. Plus the New car owner likely paid off the balance of his loan with his trade-in value, which you eventually paid for, so you essentially bought some portion of the new car value.

It must suck to be you and have no clue about monetary and finance issues. :)
 
DamnYankee said:
That's untrue. If no one bought used Mercedes cars, the market value of new ones would be much lower. Plus the New car owner likely paid off the balance of his loan with his trade-in value, which you eventually paid for, so you essentially bought some portion of the new car value.

It must suck to be you and have no clue about monetary and finance issues. :)
Click to expand...

No, idiot, I bought it at a customs auction.

Furthermore, you theory is based on an impossible assumption, therefore it is invalid.
 
Return of Dune said:
No, idiot, I bought it at a customs auction.

Furthermore, you theory is based on an impossible assumption, therefore it is invalid.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter where you bought it. You ended up paying for some portion of the new car value as I stated previously. Funny now you're inventing terms and getting confused.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top