Ford lawyers say she is open to testifying, but not Monday

floridafan said:
(CNN)Christine Blasey Ford opened the possibility she would testify before Congress about her accusation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

An email her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee said Ford "would be prepared to testify next week" if the senators offer her "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."
The message came a day ahead of a 10 a.m. Friday deadline set by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley for Ford to decide whether she would appear before a hearing he set for Monday.

Testifying Monday, however, "is not possible and the Committee's insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event," Ford's lawyers wrote.
"As you are aware, she has been receiving death threats, which have been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and she and her family have been forced out of their home," the email said. "She wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety.
Click to expand...

Translation: Gotta get botox and them tits done before I appear on national TV
 
LV426 said:
What a fucking hack.

Kill yourself.




Her account is evidence you stupid motherfucker.

If this was an investigation, her account and statement would be submitted as a piece of evidence by a prosecutor. Even the old shits who watch Law & Order every day know that.

You're just a piece of white trash.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that the only evidence needed is an accusation; because she has NOTHING else. :palm:
 
LV426 said:
Why is it that you're so eager to believe the victims of sexual assault by Catholic Priests from decades ago, but not the victims of sexual assault by Conservatives from decades ago?

The answer is you're a fucking hack.
Click to expand...

Are any of them nominated for SCOTUS??
 
LV426 said:
Then you should be the first person to be calling for the FBI to investigate because lying to the FBI carries a mandatory prison sentence.
Click to expand...

Liar. :D

Section 1621 covers general perjury, and stipulates that anyone who "willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true" is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both.

Section 1001 covers false statements more generally, without requiring an oath. The section stipulates that "whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States, knowingly and willfully" falsifies or conceals information, including before a congressional committee's inquiry, may also be fined or imprisoned up to five years.

But I don't expect an un-American DNC agitator plant, like you, to know how the law words in the US; because you're used to the laws of your foreign government.

:dealwithit:
 
LV426 said:
Let's see that link. It's an internet poll, isn't it? Or did you just make it up? Whatever it is, I'm sure you're exercising bad faith in how you're relaying the information.

That's because you're a fucking hack and you know it.
Click to expand...

Stop trying to be a foreign influence in the politics of the US, you DNC foreign agitator plant.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Are any of them nominated for SCOTUS??
Click to expand...

Makes a point, why is there a rush to approve a person to a life time position on the SCOTUS? The Founding Fathers considered it important, so why the big hurry to quickly dismiss a sexual accusation, especially given that the current appointee has all the votes he needs to be confirmed at any time? He is "nominated to SCOTUS"
 
archives said:
As I said before, a private citizen, one with no experience in the routine, appearing in front of a partisan Congressional Committee who litigate everything, to give testimony on a week's notice is inane.

Grassley knew that when he offered the invitation, and was thinking it was his way out, problem is now it has backfired on him, if he goes ahead it will be quickly framed to reflect that the GOP didn't care about giving a women's request to be heard in a sexual assault claim, as I noted, not good politically
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting that she's so stupid, that she FELT that all she had to do is make an "accusation" and she was NEVER going to have to testify??
 
floridafan said:
She has a story to tell, which may be quite compelling. This is not a court of law, and the rules of law do not apply.
Click to expand...


And what is this "long story", when she can't remember the date, where this "party" occurred, who else was there, how she got there, how she got home, or pretty much anything??
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Are you suggesting that she's so stupid, that she FELT that all she had to do is make an "accusation" and she was NEVER going to have to testify??
Click to expand...
I think that's what she believed...and Probably what they told (assured) her....then, everything fell apart....
 
archives said:
Yeah, go with that, and the "me too" will become the "no GOP"
Click to expand...

OHHHHHHHHHHHHH; so you FEEL that when a "woman" makes an accusation, with no evidence, is ever supposed to be held accountable.

Or does this just pertain to accusations against politicians with an (R) after their name??

Go tell that to the Duke lacrosse players that had their lives ruined.
 
Kacper said:
Translation: Gotta get botox and them tits done before I appear on national TV
Click to expand...

Don't forget the mascara that runs when it gets wet; because the "visuals" are needed. :palm:

Running-Mascara.jpg
 
Last edited:
archives said:
Makes a point, why is there a rush to approve a person to a life time position on the SCOTUS? The Founding Fathers considered it important, so why the big hurry to quickly dismiss a sexual accusation, especially given that the current appointee has all the votes he needs to be confirmed at any time? He is "nominated to SCOTUS"
Click to expand...

How is all the time already spent on this nomination, a "RUSH"??

Please explain in detail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top