W
WinterBorn
Guest
FatAssInTheGutter, I have no problem returning to tell folks that you can't read, and are fat.
So much for the "...a bit more moderated" part of the forum description.
FatAssInTheGutter, I have no problem returning to tell folks that you can't read, and are fat.
"We'll get to your questions once you've answered mine" has no such qualification. So answer my questions.
Or you lose the debate by default. Again.
"We'll get to your questions once you've answered mine" has no such qualification. So answer my questions.
"We'll get to your questions once you've answered mine" has no such qualification. So answer my questions.
Yes I did, post 114. Stop lying.
Honestly Fats I'm having so much fun kicking your can down the road that I don't see a need to play the game your way. But what the hell, you promised to answer my questions after I answered yours.
What I said was: "Methane is what natural gas is." Your assertion (actually Moot's, since you're uneducated in anything beyond getting your voice to sound deep) is that I said 'natural gas is 100% methane'.
Obviously these two sentences are not identical, and the first has no quantitative comparison of the two substances while the latter certainly does. Further, methane is the active ingredient in natural gas, just as morphine is the active ingredient in Oxycontin. Someone who says "morphine is what Oxycontin is" would be correct, just as I was correct when I stated that "methane is what natural gas is".
You will undoubtedly attempt to twist this in a desperate attempt to save face, but you will undoubtedly fail.
Your turn.
Not being a drug addict myself, I was incorrect that Oxycontin was morphine; it's an opioid. That doesn't change the intent of my answer.
Your turn.
No it doesn't.Oh but it does change the intent of your answer.
No it doesn't.
I fully understand your unwillingness to answer my simple question, Zap, since I caught you in an indefensible position and you'll have to admit that.
No it doesn't.
I fully understand your unwillingness to answer my simple question, Zap, since I caught you in an indefensible position and you'll have to admit that.
Well, what can I say?
At least I wasn't stupid enough to go and make some ridiculous claim like "Methane is what natural gas is."
AND THEN immediately follow it up with "Methane is a PART of what natural gas is..."
And unfortunately for you, until you straighten out the confusion created by your conflicting statements, we can'g get around to answering your question.
so, simply explain yourself and we can move this conversation forward.
Of you can continue to dodge and evade...as you've done for 1-0 opages now.
I explained to you in a way that most folks with a rudimentary understanding of the written word could understand.
In your second sentence you appear to be admitting that what you said was factually incorrect, but then find another excuse why you won't man-up to your part of the agreement.