IBDaMann
Well-known member
Pollution contributes to warming.
You didn't think anyone would notice, did you?Pollution does not add energy to Earth.
Ask me how I know that you are a complete dunce when it comes to physics.
Pollution contributes to warming.
You didn't think anyone would notice, did you?Pollution does not add energy to Earth.
You didn't think anyone would notice, did you?
Ask me how I know that you are a complete dunce when it comes to physics.
Really? What's the equation for that? I want to be able to calculate the contribution to warming if I litter a gum wrapper and if I throw some dry ice into a punch bowl.
You just said it did. Yet another paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
You have no equation, you have no science, your statement was erroneous. It was stupid on its surface, but now the error is published.It seems that you forgot something that is a part of the equation: the Sun.
You made it as plain as day for all to see you contradict yourself, and now you are in total denial. Too funny. I posted your contradiction (5 posts up). You can't delete it.What is too difficult for you to understand?
definition of material for the purpose of this discussion:Meteorites, asteroids. The earth is littered with the evidence for this.
Immaterial proportion.Then it's not a closed system since matter can cross into the earth from outside.
No. Heat has no location. It does not 'come' from anywhere.
The Earth is heated by the Sun, and the Earth dissipates that energy into space in accordance with the Stefan-Boltzmann law (conversion of thermal energy to electromagnetic energy).
Heat does not 'come from' the Sun or from anywhere else. It has no location.
You made it as plain as day for all to see you contradict yourself, and now you are in total denial. Too funny. I posted your contradiction (5 posts up). You can't delete it.
You have no equation, you have no science, your statement was erroneous. It was stupid on its surface, but now the error is published.
Same here and I worked for 30+ years as a research chemist.
No it's not. That's absurd in the extreme. Is the sky light outside right now where you are? Or has it been in the last several hours? Yeah, that's called the SUN and it exists OUTSIDE OF THE EARTH. Ergo it isn't a closed system.
He also doesn’t understand the concept/definition of ‘material’ as an adjective.You still don't know what a thermodynamic system is. You still don't know what heat is.
I don't believe you. Stop making shit up.
Like I said, you can't delete it. Your denial is pathetic.There is no contradiction. Only your comprehension difficulities.
Your delusion that your error was somehow mine is pretty sad. You posted it and you can't delete it. I pointed out your error and you can't delete that either. It's rough being you.Correct. Your error is published for everyone to see and laugh at.
Your delusion that your error was somehow mine is pretty sad. You posted it and you can't delete it. I pointed out your error and you can't delete that either. It's rough being you.
Like I said, you can't delete it. Your denial is pathetic.
There is no contradiction.
One thing you are going to have to get used to with leftists is the penchant for lying about credentials. I often encounter warmizombies who claim PhDs in physics. Perhaps that works for them on occasion but I know right away that if they believe in Global Warming or Climate Change, they are scientifically illiterate, unless they are flat out science deniers. AProudLefty claims to have a degree in mathematics with a minor in physics, and he doesn't understand bumkis about either. Those who claim to have taken courses in chemistry are trying to get you to believe as they believe without asking any questions or applying any critical reasoning because misery loves company and they just need more people in the same boat so they don't feel quite as bad about being so gullible that they fell for the religion of stupidity.I never heard of a research chemist that took ‘a’ class, as in one, in PChem.