GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

Matter is not temperature or thermal energy.
Meteorites do not slam into the Earth at all. They are part of Earth. You still do not know what a meteorite is.

The origins of the Moon are unknown. What makes you think a chunk of Earth spontaneously developed the energy to leave Earth and become the Moon? Where's the resulting crater that was left behind?

From NASA:
NASA said:
The leading theory of the Moon's origin is that a Mars-sized body collided with Earth about 4.5 billion years ago. The resulting debris from both Earth and the impactor accumulated to form our natural satellite 239,000 miles (384,000 kilometers) away. The newly formed Moon was in a molten state, but within about 100 million years, most of the global "magma ocean" had crystallized, with less-dense rocks floating upward and eventually forming the lunar crust.
SOURCE=https://science.nasa.gov/moon/facts/


You are free to ignore science as you like.
 
That is correct. They can't.

That is exactly right. Depending on which spot they use, they will get a different reading.

Science is not a sample or sampling.

Argument from randU fallacy. Science is not samples or sampling.

You are actually trying to argue that a single thermometer can measure the temperature of the Earth.

Science is not measurements.

Science is not gambling.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Among the ones you ignore as a matter of routine are the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You are attempting math errors.

You're a moron.
 
If you think the earth is a thermodynamically closed system you didn't even get a "C" in P Chem. Even if you go with the more "broad" "closed to matter" aspect you are wrong. We have meteorites hit all the time.

Ergo you are wrong.

The Earth is one thermodynamic closed system. The Sun-Earth-space system is another. The entire known Universe is another. You never took P Chem. ALL of them are closed thermodynamic systems.
Meteorites do not hit Earth. They are part of Earth.

You still don't know what heat is, you don't know what a thermodynamic system is, and you still don't know what a meteorite is.
 
Knock knock hello? You just confirmed that your OP is about China. You're the one who told us to take a look at the first page of the search, which is all about China.

Do you have a hard time keeping track of your own argument? If so, I'll understand. I'll go slow for you and help guide you.

Random post. No apparent coherency. No argument presented.
 
You are fractally wrong. The earth is open to both exchange of MATTER as well as exchange of ENERGY. It is about as open a system as is imaginable.

You are simply wrong by every definition.

You don't get to declare every definition. Omniscience fallacy.
You obviously don't know what a fractal is either.
You still don't know what a thermodynamic system is. You still don't know what heat is.
 
The "Mid Century Cooling" that was seen in the 20th century was likely due to sulfate aerosol pollution. So it works both ways. As WWII caused industrial ramp-up the amount of sulfates going into the atmosphere appears to have lead to some cooling since sulfates can act as a "negative forcing". Once we finally started to clean up the air in the 1970's the cooling ended and the warming resumed because we were still dumping tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

What 'Mid Century Cooling'?
What 'sulfate aerosol pollution'?

No chemical is a force.

There is no such thing as a 'greenhouse gas' except as a religious artifact.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
No gas or vapor is capable of destroying energy into nothing, nor capable of creating energy out of nothing.
You cannot trap heat.
You cannot trap light.
You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

Now go wrap yourself in a nice warm blanket of sulfates.
 
What is the material exchange of matter? I've always agreed there was an exchange of nrg. If there's an exchange of nrg and no material exchange of matter, by def. the system is a thermodynamic closed system.
I'm mildly curious as to what YOUR def. is of a closed system.

In any given thermodynamics system, any energy source of sink from outside that system is simply not considered.

If, for example, you use just the Earth as the chosen thermodynamic system, the Sun is not considered nor is the space around Earth not considered. Just the Earth itself.

Since CO2 is part of Earth, the Church of Global Warming is trying to claim that this magick Holy Gas is somehow able to add energy to this system. This obviously violates both the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics.

If, as another example, you use the Sun-Earth-space system as the chosen thermodynamic system, the Church of Global Warming is trying to claim that this magick Holy Gas is somehow add energy to the system, or is trying to claim that a colder gas in the atmosphere can heat a warmer surface (reduction of entropy). This obviously violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics, but also violates the 1st law of thermodynamics by adding energy to the given system.

The Church of Global Warming also tries to claim that light can be trapped, or that increasing the Earth's temperature reduces radiance (in violation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law and the 2nd law of thermodynamics).

As you already know, entropy can never be decreased. It MUST increase or stay the same.
 
Back
Top