Into the Night
Verified User
Tell that to the Parrot Boy since he thinks it's impossible to trap heat (the Greenhouse Effect).
Random phrase. No apparent coherency. No argument presented.
Tell that to the Parrot Boy since he thinks it's impossible to trap heat (the Greenhouse Effect).
Matter is not temperature or thermal energy.
Meteorites do not slam into the Earth at all. They are part of Earth. You still do not know what a meteorite is.
The origins of the Moon are unknown. What makes you think a chunk of Earth spontaneously developed the energy to leave Earth and become the Moon? Where's the resulting crater that was left behind?
SOURCE=https://science.nasa.gov/moon/facts/NASA said:The leading theory of the Moon's origin is that a Mars-sized body collided with Earth about 4.5 billion years ago. The resulting debris from both Earth and the impactor accumulated to form our natural satellite 239,000 miles (384,000 kilometers) away. The newly formed Moon was in a molten state, but within about 100 million years, most of the global "magma ocean" had crystallized, with less-dense rocks floating upward and eventually forming the lunar crust.
That is correct. They can't.
That is exactly right. Depending on which spot they use, they will get a different reading.
Science is not a sample or sampling.
Argument from randU fallacy. Science is not samples or sampling.
You are actually trying to argue that a single thermometer can measure the temperature of the Earth.
Science is not measurements.
Science is not gambling.
Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Among the ones you ignore as a matter of routine are the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
You are attempting math errors.
If you think the earth is a thermodynamically closed system you didn't even get a "C" in P Chem. Even if you go with the more "broad" "closed to matter" aspect you are wrong. We have meteorites hit all the time.
Ergo you are wrong.
How do you know this? Have you measured literally every single surface of the entire human body? You DO realize that is an infinite number of sites, right?
Global Warming has been defined.
You can trap heat.
You're talking about China, which is number one in pollution I believe.
Then provide that definition here and now.
Pollution contributes to warming.
I guess you never learned about thermal index either.
Knock knock hello? You just confirmed that your OP is about China. You're the one who told us to take a look at the first page of the search, which is all about China.
Do you have a hard time keeping track of your own argument? If so, I'll understand. I'll go slow for you and help guide you.
Define this 'pollution'. What is polluting what? How is this 'pollution' adding energy to Earth?
They come from off the earth and land on the earth. Meaning the earth is NOT a closed system to matter. Or to energy. Either one.
Define this 'pollution'. What is polluting what? How is this 'pollution' adding energy to Earth?
You are fractally wrong. The earth is open to both exchange of MATTER as well as exchange of ENERGY. It is about as open a system as is imaginable.
You are simply wrong by every definition.
You don't get to declare every definition. Omniscience fallacy.
You obviously don't know what a fractal is either.
You still don't know what a thermodynamic system is. You still don't know what heat is.
The "Mid Century Cooling" that was seen in the 20th century was likely due to sulfate aerosol pollution. So it works both ways. As WWII caused industrial ramp-up the amount of sulfates going into the atmosphere appears to have lead to some cooling since sulfates can act as a "negative forcing". Once we finally started to clean up the air in the 1970's the cooling ended and the warming resumed because we were still dumping tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
What is the material exchange of matter? I've always agreed there was an exchange of nrg. If there's an exchange of nrg and no material exchange of matter, by def. the system is a thermodynamic closed system.
I'm mildly curious as to what YOUR def. is of a closed system.
Ah I see. You're the first person I've seen that use that term.