GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

Hey dim-wad, he said "relatively." This is where you get to ask him what he means by the word "relatively." As for asking him how he knows what he means by it, this is just another stupid question on your part.
Looks like he’s APL’s sock with his trademark circular arguments.
 

I'm not going to say that everything within this video is perfectly accurate, but the overarching point is a rather interesting one about the silliness that the Church of Global Warming wants people to believe. Apparently everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else... Here is a particular Google search showing this... Just scroll down the first page and you'll see what I mean...
https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf....0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131j0i10.5pGCYPodCpE

Any Church members care to address this?


I assume this falls under "Settled Science", as defined by Global Warming Mythology? ;)



http://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/2/global-warming-mythology-reference-manual

You just want to make sure that everyone on the site knows you are an ignoramous? You succeded.
 
If you mischaracterize a position then anything is possible!
What did I mischaracterize?

Here are the top results from yet another simple Google search that I did:

The "American West" is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.
Alaska is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.
"The Arctic" is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.
Antarctica is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.
"The Arctic" is "warming FOUR TIMES FASTER THAN" the rest of the world.
Europe is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.
Canada is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.
"The Middle East" is "warming twice as fast as" the rest of the world.

Others have noticed the same thing that I have noticed:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/10...rld-is-warming-faster-than-the-entire-planet/

https://www.johnlocke.org/reports-anywhere-on-earth-is-warming-faster-than-everywhere-else-on-earth/

So, I ask again, what am I mischaracterizing?

Apparently "everywhere" is "warming twice as fast as" "everywhere else".

How does that make any sense?
 
You just want to make sure that everyone on the site knows you are an ignoramous? You succeded.
gfm7175 showed three things quite effectively:

1. Only the logically inept become members of the Global Warming congregation
2. The Church of Global Warming is full of cowardly ignoramuses who have no business pretending to role play thienth geniutheth/thmart perthonth.
3. You can't read; you are one of the ignoramuses in this equation.
 
They come from off the earth and land on the earth. Meaning the earth is NOT a closed system to matter. Or to energy. Either one.

Immaterial for purposes of closed system definition unless you can identify other more material objects entering the system. The Earth is a thermodynamic closed system.
 
Immaterial for purposes of closed system definition unless you can identify other more material objects entering the system. The Earth is a thermodynamic closed system.

You are fractally wrong. The earth is open to both exchange of MATTER as well as exchange of ENERGY. It is about as open a system as is imaginable.

You are simply wrong by every definition.
 
Pollution contributes to warming.

The "Mid Century Cooling" that was seen in the 20th century was likely due to sulfate aerosol pollution. So it works both ways. As WWII caused industrial ramp-up the amount of sulfates going into the atmosphere appears to have lead to some cooling since sulfates can act as a "negative forcing". Once we finally started to clean up the air in the 1970's the cooling ended and the warming resumed because we were still dumping tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
 
You are fractally wrong. The earth is open to both exchange of MATTER as well as exchange of ENERGY. It is about as open a system as is imaginable.

What is the material exchange of matter? I've always agreed there was an exchange of nrg. If there's an exchange of nrg and no material exchange of matter, by def. the system is a thermodynamic closed system.
I'm mildly curious as to what YOUR def. is of a closed system.
 
What is the material exchange of matter? I've always agreed there was an exchange of nrg. If there's an exchange of nrg and no material exchange of matter, by def. the system is a thermodynamic closed system.
I'm mildly curious as to what YOUR def. is of a closed system.

Why do you spell it "nrg"?
 
Back
Top