Gonna leave this here to trigger JPP MAGAts more

BartenderElite said:
As soon as Trump told supporters to go home - they did.

He could have done it right away. He waited 3 hours.

The rest of your post is total nonsense. No wonder you have to do the insult thing all the time (which couldn't matter less, btw - it's funny that people think those "sting" on an internet message board).
Click to expand...
That's nice that you're willing to give me advice and let me know how ineffective I am. It's actually sort of sweet, but I don't go for your type, sorry. You're a moron, that's just true based on evidence. I'm also sorry about that, I wish it was different for you.

Anyways, thanks for your compelling insights, you definitely won this debate with all those facts and destroying mine, really impressive. ROFL
 
AProudLefty said:
So you believe the accusations against Trump?

And it's adorable that you believe that I am a racist. Didn't you say this, "Sainted BLM foot soldiers"?
Click to expand...
Yeah, I did. You're such a dumbass, you can't even understand how you're being a racist by thinking it's racist to call out BLM foot soldiers. You're hopeless, you're pathetic, and you're definitely a racist dumbass.
 
Nomad said:
That's all a matter of individual taste and preference.
Click to expand...
That's exactly my point. The immature and HATEFUL preferences of the undereducated leftists aren't funny to mature adults.

Nomad said:
The truth is that the show has never been always funny
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. SNL was predominantly hilarious for a good span of time, until it became a tool for the Socialist Party USA, at which point, all solid humor was replaced with sophomoric insults of conservatives.

Nomad said:
I've watched it pretty consistently since its inception in the mid 70's and I've seen both good and bad.
Click to expand...
You're also an undereducated and HATEFUL leftist. You live for negative commentary about conservatives, especially fictitious commentary with no basis in truth. You NEED it like a druggy needs his fix, and if you can get it under the pretense of "comedy" then take it you will. All that matters is that you get your fix.

Nonetheless, SNL is not funny anymore to people without any need to be bent over furniture and reamed by the DNC.

Nomad said:
And lastly, contrary to your BS claim about 'angry, undereducated and immature leftists", they make fun of those people too.
Click to expand...
Not nearly in the same way. When SNL lampoons leftists, it's always lighthearted humor of endearment, never the HATEFUL and unfunny vitriol hurled at conservatives.

So long story short, as usual, you have no idea what you're blabbering about.
 
IBDaMann said:
That's exactly my point. The immature and HATEFUL preferences of the undereducated leftists aren't funny to mature adults.


Irrelevant. SNL was predominantly hilarious for a good span of time, until it became a tool for the Socialist Party USA, at which point, all solid humor was replaced with sophomoric insults of conservatives.


You're also an undereducated and HATEFUL leftist. You live for negative commentary about conservatives, especially fictitious commentary with no basis in truth. You NEED it like a druggy needs his fix, and if you can get it under the pretense of "comedy" then take it you will. All that matters is that you get your fix.

Nonetheless, SNL is not funny anymore to people without any need to be bent over furniture and reamed by the DNC.


Not nearly in the same way. When SNL lampoons leftists, it's always lighthearted humor of endearment, never the HATEFUL and unfunny vitriol hurled at conservatives.

So long story short, as usual, you have no idea what you're blabbering about.
Click to expand...
"A tool for the Socialist Party USA." :rofl2:

Was that before or after they made fun of Biden and Kamala?
 
IBDaMann said:
Nordberg, the Nazis were a leftist HATE group like the DNC. Too funny.
Click to expand...
The Nazis, formally the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), are a tricky bunch to pin down on the modern left-right political spectrum. Their name includes "Socialist" and "Workers'," which might sound leftist—think government control, social programs, or anti-elite vibes. And sure, they did push some policies like public works projects and anti-capitalist rhetoric early on to woo the working class. But that’s where the leftist trail starts to fade.
In practice, the Nazis were fiercely anti-communist and anti-socialist—both hallmarks of the left back then. They crushed trade unions, banned leftist parties like the Communists (KPD), and cozied up to big industrialists once in power. Their ideology leaned hard into nationalism, racial hierarchy, and militarism, which align more with far-right fascism than anything resembling leftist egalitarianism. Hitler himself despised Marxism, calling it a Jewish conspiracy, and the Night of the Long Knives in 1934—where he purged the "left-leaning" SA faction—pretty much sealed the deal.

@Grok
 
Tobytone said:
That's nice that you're willing to give me advice and let me know how ineffective I am. It's actually sort of sweet, but I don't go for your type, sorry. You're a moron, that's just true based on evidence. I'm also sorry about that, I wish it was different for you.

Anyways, thanks for your compelling insights, you definitely won this debate with all those facts and destroying mine, really impressive. ROFL
Click to expand...

Thanks. It will always be a fact that Trump could have stopped that riot 3 hours earlier - because he did, when he finally decided to.

Trump is a terrible leader.
 
AProudLefty said:
Let's ask Grok, shall we?

"MAGAt" is a slang term commonly used in American political discourse. It is a blend of "MAGA," which stands for "Make America Great Again" (a slogan popularized by Donald Trump during his presidential campaigns), and "maggot," a word for a fly larva. The term is typically employed as a derogatory or pejorative label for ardent supporters of Donald Trump, implying that they are blindly loyal, uncritical, or distasteful in their political allegiance.
The usage often carries a negative connotation, suggesting that these individuals are seen as extreme, irrational, or overly devoted to Trump and his ideology. It has been widely used in online discussions, particularly on platforms like X, and in some political commentary to criticize or mock Trump supporters. The term's offensive nature stems from its homophonic play on "maggot," which evokes imagery of decay or repulsion, rather than from any inherent homophobic or unrelated meaning.
While it’s primarily a term of insult, its interpretation can vary depending on context—some might use it humorously, while others wield it with serious disdain. Posts on X and various web sources, like Urban Dictionary and Wiktionary, consistently define it as a derogatory reference to Trump loyalists, often highlighting their perceived fanaticism or rejection of opposing viewpoints.
Click to expand...

"Faggot"? It never occurred to me when I started calling the losers MAGATs that that had anything to do with it. It has everything to do with our innate human revulsion for stupid, squirmy, squishy, moist, white disgusting things that feed on the dead. lol
 
AProudLefty said:
You're a racist for lying about BLM.
Click to expand...
What the hell are you blabbering about, you sanctimonious twit? I didn’t lie about BLM, those riot-loving clowns burned cities to the ground, and I’ll shout it from the rooftops. But even if I did stretch the truth, that doesn’t make me a racist, you absolute drooling imbecile.

Meanwhile, you and your libtard posse are the real bigots, obsessed with skin pigment like it’s a religion. Every word out of your mouth drips with melanin metrics, lowering standards for “diverse” hires, doling out jobs by racial quota, all because you’ve got some warped fetish for color-coding humanity.

You’re not just racist, you’re a hypocritical, race-baiting dumbass so deep in your own dogma you can’t even see it. Accuse me all you want, you melanin-worshipping dumbass!
 
Tobytone said:
What the hell are you blabbering about, you sanctimonious twit? I didn’t lie about BLM, those riot-loving clowns burned cities to the ground, and I’ll shout it from the rooftops. But even if I did stretch the truth, that doesn’t make me a racist, you absolute drooling imbecile.

Meanwhile, you and your libtard posse are the real bigots, obsessed with skin pigment like it’s a religion. Every word out of your mouth drips with melanin metrics, lowering standards for “diverse” hires, doling out jobs by racial quota, all because you’ve got some warped fetish for color-coding humanity.

You’re not just racist, you’re a hypocritical, race-baiting dumbass so deep in your own dogma you can’t even see it. Accuse me all you want, you melanin-worshipping dumbass!
Click to expand...
"Riot-loving clowns." Lying again? BLM protested. Maybe you believe the BLM was involved in Rodney King riots?

Doesn't feel good to be accused of racism, Does it?
 
AProudLefty said:
Let's ask Grok, shall we?

"MAGAt" is a slang term commonly used in American political discourse. It is a blend of "MAGA," which stands for "Make America Great Again" (a slogan popularized by Donald Trump during his presidential campaigns), and "maggot," a word for a fly larva. The term is typically employed as a derogatory or pejorative label for ardent supporters of Donald Trump, implying that they are blindly loyal, uncritical, or distasteful in their political allegiance.
The usage often carries a negative connotation, suggesting that these individuals are seen as extreme, irrational, or overly devoted to Trump and his ideology. It has been widely used in online discussions, particularly on platforms like X, and in some political commentary to criticize or mock Trump supporters. The term's offensive nature stems from its homophonic play on "maggot," which evokes imagery of decay or repulsion, rather than from any inherent homophobic or unrelated meaning.
While it’s primarily a term of insult, its interpretation can vary depending on context—some might use it humorously, while others wield it with serious disdain. Posts on X and various web sources, like Urban Dictionary and Wiktionary, consistently define it as a derogatory reference to Trump loyalists, often highlighting their perceived fanaticism or rejection of opposing viewpoints.
Click to expand...
I guess it depends upon how the question was asked since my answer had nothing to do with sexuality.

What is MAGAt?

A "MAGAt" is a term that’s popped up mostly online, especially on platforms like X, and it’s a twist on "MAGA," which stands for "Make America Great Again"—Donald Trump’s campaign slogan. The "t" at the end makes it a mashup with "maggot," so it’s typically used as an insult by people critical of Trump supporters. It’s thrown around to suggest that MAGA folks are unthinking, extreme, or even deplorable—think of it as a snarky jab. For example, X posts often use it to mock perceived hypocrisy or blind loyalty among Trump’s base, like calling out someone waving a flag while ranting about election fraud

On the flip side, some Trump supporters have leaned into it sarcastically or defiantly, claiming it could mean something like "Making America Great Again Together" to flip the script. There’s no official definition—it’s a slang term that’s as much about tone as content. Context matters: if you see it in a heated political thread, it’s probably not a compliment. Does that clear it up? Anything else you want to dig into about it?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
"Faggot"? It never occurred to me when I started calling the losers MAGATs that that had anything to do with it. It has everything to do with our innate human revulsion for stupid, squirmy, squishy, moist, white disgusting things that feed on the dead. lol
Click to expand...
I never saw a homosexual angle in it, just the rotten flesh eating bug.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top