GOP member wants bishop ‘added to deportation list’ after Trump prayer service

WinterBorn said:
You are assuming what I think and what I believe are against Damo's rules.
Click to expand...


No, paw paw, I'm correcting your erroneous statement, to wit:

WinterBorn said:
I'll happily say what I think and what I believe. That is one of the rights we enjoy here.
Click to expand...


I'll concede that you could exercise your imaginary right to say what you like on @Damocles's forum, but there are consequences for doing so in a manner inconsistent with his interpretation of the rules.

Roll, Tide!
 
Since Alabaman education seems to have failed @WinterBorn, here's a quick guide:

Here are some common misunderstandings about the First Amendment:
  1. Freedom of Speech is Absolute:
    • Misunderstanding: Many people believe that freedom of speech means you can say anything without any consequences.
    • Reality: While the First Amendment protects speech from government censorship, it does not protect against all consequences, such as private sector repercussions (e.g., being fired from a job for speech) or civil liabilities (e.g., defamation lawsuits). Also, certain categories of speech like incitement, true threats, and obscenity are not fully protected.
  2. Hate Speech is Not Protected:
    • Misunderstanding: There's a widespread belief that hate speech isn't protected under the First Amendment.
    • Reality: The U.S. does not legally define "hate speech," and most hate speech is protected unless it falls into unprotected categories like threats or incitement to violence. However, this can vary, and some forms of hate speech might lead to legal consequences in specific contexts.
  3. The Right to Free Speech Means a Right to an Audience:
    • Misunderstanding: People often think they have a right to speak wherever and whenever they want.
    • Reality: While you have the right to speak, this does not extend to forcing others to listen or to use private property for your speech without permission. Public forums have different regulations, but even there, time, place, and manner restrictions can apply if they are content-neutral and leave ample alternative channels for communication.
  4. Privacy of Speech:
    • Misunderstanding: Some believe that private conversations are protected by the First Amendment from being recorded or monitored.
    • Reality: The First Amendment does not protect against private parties recording or monitoring conversations in many cases, especially if consent laws are followed where applicable.
Understanding these nuances helps in appreciating the balance between protecting free expression and maintaining order and rights in society.


@Grok




Roll, Tide!


Haw, haw......................................haw.
 
Diogenes said:
No, paw paw, I'm correcting your erroneous statement, to wit:




I'll concede that you could exercise your imaginary right to say what you like on @Damocles's forum, but there are consequences for doing so in a manner inconsistent with his interpretation of the rules.

Roll, Tide!
Click to expand...

And I am free to post what I choose. I will choose whether I post things that will get me banned.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
9hzupz.jpg
Click to expand...

^^^Never read the bible, much less Mark's Gospel. Knows nothing at all about Jewish culture, much less what 'neighbor' means in any context anywhere in the bible.
 
Diogenes said:
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Click to expand...

Somehow they always miss that part, and think Christians are banned from Federal property or something, while homosexual fetishists are allowed to groom children in public schools and encourage them to sexually mutilate themselves.

They're just bizarre sickos who need deporting.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Anchor babies
Click to expand...
Anchor babies are a myth. A child cannot sponsor his parents until he is 21, so hardly a baby. It then takes years on the waiting list to get a visa. It depends on the country, but it could be 35 years after birth before a parent gets into the country.

Uncensored2008 said:
Until the 1960's - there were no anchor babies.
Click to expand...
trump's father was born in the USA to two illegal alien parents, so birthright citizenship goes back further than 1960.
 
EdwinA said:
^^^Never read the bible, much less Mark's Gospel. Knows nothing at all about Jewish culture, much less what 'neighbor' means in any context anywhere in the bible.
Click to expand...
Let me help you. The Samaritans had a similar religion to the Jews, and consider themselves the real Israelites. The name Samaritan refers to the city of Samaria, the capital of post-separation Israel.

You would think having similar religions would mean the Jews and Samaritans were close. You would not be more wrong. The Jews destroyed the Samaritan Second Temple, and the Samaritans supported destroying the Jewish Second Temple. The hatred was extreme between these two religions that claimed descent from the Israelites.

Jesus chose the most hated neighbors to be the neighbor in his story.
 
EdwinA said:
^^^Never read the bible, much less Mark's Gospel. Knows nothing at all about Jewish culture, much less what 'neighbor' means in any context anywhere in the bible.
Click to expand...
Clearly. At least you are more honest than most MAGAts, Ms. Edwina. Thank you for that.

Most MAGAts are self-appointed Bible and US law experts. Will you also admit you're not a legal expert, ma'am?
 
Earl said:
Horse mierda, Walter.

The far left loons like you don’t want deportations of illegals, many of whom are terrorists.

You support terrorism, Walter.

You should be ashamed.
Click to expand...
Another great example of the hate and division being spread by anti-Americans seeking to destroy our Republic.
 
Walt said:
Let me help you. The Samaritans had a similar religion to the Jews, and consider themselves the real Israelites. The name Samaritan refers to the city of Samaria, the capital of post-separation Israel.

You would think having similar religions would mean the Jews and Samaritans were close. You would not be more wrong. The Jews destroyed the Samaritan Second Temple, and the Samaritans supported destroying the Jewish Second Temple. The hatred was extreme between these two religions that claimed descent from the Israelites.

Jesus chose the most hated neighbors to be the neighbor in his story.
Click to expand...

Wrong. Like I said, few here know anything about it, especially the Xians bashers and assorted deviants.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top