USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I wonder what "riders" were attached??
GOP Senate blocks 3 election security bills.
- Thread starter Tacomaman
- Start date
I wonder what "riders" were attached??
In other words, meaningless drivel.Fascist leftists and their appetite for meaningless bullshit.
No, rather just another revelation that the last thing Trump wants is a secure election, we already know he wants foreign involvement so why would Mitch even consider a bill making it a requirement for any campaign to report foreign aid to the FBI and FEC
Why does anyone even bother with the "truthie," I guess the "Hill," a Murdoch vehicle, just got it all wrong, beautiful
"Senate GOP blocks three election security "
Why? Because you say so? That type of argument just won't cut it.
Why? Because you or MSNBC/CNN say so? That type of argument just won't cut it.
There is no reason for the Republican controlled Senate to consider any bill passed along straight party lines in the House.
Apparently, you, like Pelosi, haven't learned how the legislative process works. You're arguments have no beef, facts or intelligence.
Funny, Trump wants three billion for his wall in his budget but you tell us Mexico is currently paying for it so what does Trump want the billions for?
Show us exactly where and how Mexico is paying for Trump's Wall
(want to guess what comes next, the insults, corny copy and paste, or both)
Ironic from someone who argues that "because you say so" is substantive. Let's face it Arsecheese, you wallow in a puddle of arrogance and denial because you have a glaring lack of self awareness.
You come in here and parrot lie filled MSNBC/CNN talking points, then mock Fox? It is really pathetic and dumb. I wish you were as smart as you presume yourself to be; but then, you wouldn't be a partisan hack for the Party of the Jackass.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
lol.....so they didn't block the bill, they (actually she) blocked their effort to bypass the House procedures.....
so basically, thread fail again......
Think of it as an apartment dwelling. You cannot charge rent until it is built.
So, have you written your congressperson to demand that they work WITH Trump to ensure that happens? Yes or no? I will understand your refusal to answer that and your futile efforts to flail and deflect from it.
Right after you answer my question. So, have you written your congressperson to demand that they work WITH Trump to ensure that happens?
Still lying, crying and failing I see.
Ah, the "Hill," owned by Murdoch, isn't MSNBC, and coupled with Barr's recent actions on the elections pretty much paints the picture
Noticed you didn't offer any reasons why anyone would oppose these bills
And the bills didn't come from the House, they were introduced by Warner and Blumenthal in the Senate, do you ever get anything correct?
So in other words, you don't have the slightest clue of what you are bloviating about and can't answer the question. Got it.
Well then you don't "notice" very much. I can see why with those eyes and ears so tightly closed. There is no reason for the Republican controlled Senate to consider any bill passed along straight party lines in the House.
LINK please.
Think of it as an apartment dwelling. You cannot charge rent until it is built.
So, have you written your congressperson to demand that they work WITH Trump to ensure that happens? Yes or no? I will understand your refusal to answer that and your futile efforts to flail and deflect from it.
Right after you answer my question. So, have you written your congressperson to demand that they work WITH Trump to ensure that happens?
Still lying, crying and failing I see.
Always said "truthie" was entertaining, too funny, "think of it as an apartment dwelling, you can not charge rent until it is built"
So now Trump's wall we are paying for, and he is taken money from the military to build, is going to be paid by Mexico once it is finished, they are going to pay "rent" for it, and what are you going to invict them if they refuse to pay "rent"
Forget the corny copy and pastes, this is funnier, instant classic
So in other words, you don't have the slightest clue of what you are bloviating about and can't answer the question. Got it.
Well then you don't "notice" very much. I can see why with those eyes and ears so tightly closed. There is no reason for the Republican controlled Senate to consider any bill passed along straight party lines in the House.
LINK please.
Then he repeats the same whopper two more times, priceless (https://thehill.com/homenews/house/482569-senate-gop-blocks-three-election-security-bills)
And as a side note, the vote on anything coming out of the House doesn't on its own automatically mean rejection in the Senate, least that is not the way the Founders designed it, if it did, nothing would ever pass, did you think partisan votes are aplicable to this House only.
As usual Arsecheese flails and cries and cannot come up with a coherent argument. Boring child.
Again, have you written your congressperson to demand that they work WITH Trump to ensure that happens? Yes or no? I will understand your refusal to answer that and your futile efforts to flail and deflect from it.
Your corny lie filled posts are boorish and lacking in intelligence.
I guess you missed this part: “They are attempting to bypass this body’s Rules Committee on behalf of various bills that will seize control over elections from the states and take it from the states and where do they want to put it? They want it to rest in the hands of Washington, D.C., bureaucrats,”
It doesn't matter where the bills originate; it is apparent that neither you, or the Party of the Jackass know how the legislative process works.
If it is passed by a straight partisan vote, yes it is automatically rejected. Ever hear the term conference committee?
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
Again, if Democrats believe that they can shut out the minority Party in the House and shove their legislation down the Republican controlled Senate, they forgot how the legislative process works.
I expect you will cry, lie and flail some more on this topic. And even when proven to be wrong and stupid, will double down on stupid and wrong.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
"she" is Blackburn, who cast the only vote necessary to block the demmycunts from bypassing the senate procedures.......if you think the laws proposed are valid, go through the procedures set forth in the senate rules to convince a majority of that.......they attempted to claim the approval was "unanimous".......if its not unanimous it obviously cannot be approved by unanimous consent......
I guess you missed this part: “They are attempting to bypass this body’s Rules Committee on behalf of various bills that will seize control over elections from the states and take it from the states and where do they want to put it? They want it to rest in the hands of Washington, D.C., bureaucrats,”
It doesn't matter where the bills originate; it is apparent that neither you, or the Party of the Jackass know how the legislative process works.
If it is passed by a straight partisan vote, yes it is automatically rejected. Ever hear the term conference committee?
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
Again, if Democrats believe that they can shut out the minority Party in the House and shove their legislation down the Republican controlled Senate, they forgot how the legislative process works.
I expect you will cry, lie and flail some more on this topic. And even when proven to be wrong and stupid, will double down on stupid and wrong.
Last time, see if it sinks in, the bill started in the Senate, it didn't come from the House, all the "how a bill becomes a law" guidelines you can copy and post don't apply here, it didn't originate in the House
And the "arguement" about "seizing control over elections from the States" is bogus, how does a requirement calling for reporting foreign influence take anything form the States? how does banning voting machines connecting to the Internet take anything form the States? and the "beaurcrats" involved are the FBI and FEC, who last I knew, were suppose to insure a secure election
Want to try again, or accept the fact you got nothing offer here
Are you daft, the question was why was were the bills rejected not how they were rejected, show us the reason why bills aimed at securing a national election were given consideration? why would one object to them? what is in them that anyone would oppose?
What part of “They are attempting to bypass this body’s Rules Committee on behalf of various bills that will seize control over elections from the states and take it from the states and where do they want to put it? They want it to rest in the hands of Washington, D.C., bureaucrats,” are you still struggling to comprehend here?
I see you are still struggling to comprehend how the legislative process works:
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
It's obvious that my attempts to educate you are fruitless because you lack the intelligence it would take to comprehend the obvious. You never have much of anything to offer other than puerile, uneducated lie filled narratives you parrot from MSNBC and CNN.