What a pile of illiterate bile. Go back to school child.
It has been shown to you; this is your typical response to anything you don't like or disagree with:
GOP Senate blocks 3 election security bills.
- Thread starter Tacomaman
- Start date
What a pile of illiterate bile. Go back to school child.
It has been shown to you; this is your typical response to anything you don't like or disagree with:
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
What part of “They are attempting to bypass this body’s Rules Committee on behalf of various bills that will seize control over elections from the states and take it from the states and where do they want to put it? They want it to rest in the hands of Washington, D.C., bureaucrats,” are you still struggling to comprehend here?
I see you are still struggling to comprehend how the legislative process works:
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
It's obvious that my attempts to educate you are fruitless because you lack the intelligence it would take to comprehend the obvious. You never have much of anything to offer other than puerile, uneducated lie filled narratives you parrot from MSNBC and CNN.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it .............?
Not about how the bill was rejected, like the third time, but whythe bill was rejected, what is in it that didn't merit further consideration
You can try again, but if you are going to again repost the same, don't waste my time
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I guess you missed this part: “They are attempting to bypass this body’s Rules Committee on behalf of various bills that will seize control over elections from the states and take it from the states and where do they want to put it? They want it to rest in the hands of Washington, D.C., bureaucrats,”
It doesn't matter where the bills originate; it is apparent that neither you, or the Party of the Jackass know how the legislative process works.
If it is passed by a straight partisan vote, yes it is automatically rejected. Ever hear the term conference committee?
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
Again, if Democrats believe that they can shut out the minority Party in the House and shove their legislation down the Republican controlled Senate, they forgot how the legislative process works.
I expect you will cry, lie and flail some more on this topic. And even when proven to be wrong and stupid, will double down on stupid and wrong.
Beautiful, we are suppose to have a the actual bills as sources, amazing, I see BreitFart, InfoWars, blaze, RT, pat dollard, etc., all accepted as sources by the right but now one wants the actual legislative bills posted
By the way, the "Hill" leans right, Murdoch owns it, did you think they were lying?
What a pile of illiterate bile. Go back to school child.
It has been shown to you; this is your typical response to anything you don't like or disagree with:
Ah, as usual, when out of content, the corny copy and pastes follow, like the towel hitting the canvas
Next
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
YEP.
You can lead Jackasses to the facts, but you can't make them understand the obvious.
Still can't comprehend how legislation gets enacted. Let's try again, after all, you are a Jackass:
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
Ironic; that is all you seem to be is a massive waste of time. Even when slapped with the facts numerous times, you're still to big of a dishonest moron to comprehend the obvious.
Run along child.
Strawman.
There is a process; Democrats tried to circumvent them. How stupid are you that you are incapable of comprehending the obvious? Perhaps you're just a brain dead, mindless partisan hack who is uninterested in the truth, reality or facts?
Ah, as usual, when shown what a lying, phony dumbass he is, Arsecheese cries and bitches like a little girl.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
the bills were rejected because the demmycrats tried to pass on a unanimous consent without unanimity........if you want them to be given consideration, follow the senate procedures for consideration........I have no idea what was in them that someone could oppose.......no one has provided the text of any of them........I do know one of them provided for transferring the authority for elections from the states to the federal government.......that is something any Republican would oppose......another was a proposal to hand out more money from federal taxpayers........it would certainly be consistent for Republicans to reject that.......link them and we can have an actual discussion on their merits.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
its a pity you won't cut and paste a copy of one of the bills.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
sort of hard to discuss what's wrong with the bill without seeing a copy of the bill.......maybe that's why there wasn't unanimous consent......the demmycrats like to make people vote on things before letting them see it.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
since the Demmycrats seem unable to find a copy of the bills, here is one of them.....
H.R. 1 The For The People Act of 2019
here is one clause I would object to unless amended.....
unless amended it would prohibit preventing some from registering to vote if they did not meed the basic requirement for someone who is permitted to register to vote.......
do you believe the law should make it illegal to prevent someone who does not meet the requirements of registering from registering to vote?.......
H.R. 1 The For The People Act of 2019
here is one clause I would object to unless amended.....
unless amended it would prohibit preventing some from registering to vote if they did not meed the basic requirement for someone who is permitted to register to vote.......
do you believe the law should make it illegal to prevent someone who does not meet the requirements of registering from registering to vote?.......