Greta Thunberg

When computers used to fill 2 rooms, people said that they would never have any practical personal use.

Wind & solar just need time. They're the future.

How? Why do you think this?

I think nuclear is the future and I can explain exactly why I think that...in excruciating detail. Can you do the same?
 
I heard someone say that we have moved on from global warming as the outrage of the day, as we had before moved on from #METOO.....We are now on the BLM outrage.

What comes next and causes us to forget about BLM..."Oh THat....Who cares"?

Should we start a poll as to what will be present by our betters?
 
Yes. Yes I can.

Great. I'll go first. Efficient energy generation is really nothing more than being able to boil water. Consistent delivery of energy means you've got to be ale to boil water 24/7. You like like wind and solar. Wind isn't 24/7, neither is solar...unless you're collecting solar in orbit. The problem with that is that you're not talking about solar anymore, you're talking about microwaves. They have to be sent down to the surface...to boil water and the collectors are subject to all kinds of nasty stuff in space not to mention they'd still not be efficient because they'd be eclipsed. so...we're right back to the surface again and there are two ways I know of to boil a shitload of water here, one is fossil fuels and the other is nuclear. I am going to go out on a limb here and say you don't like fossil fuels so the process of elimination leaves us with...nuclear.
 
Great. I'll go first. Efficient energy generation is really nothing more than being able to boil water. Consistent delivery of energy means you've got to be ale to boil water 24/7. You like like wind and solar. Wind isn't 24/7, neither is solar...unless you're collecting solar in orbit. The problem with that is that you're not talking about solar anymore, you're talking about microwaves. They have to be sent down to the surface...to boil water and the collectors are subject to all kinds of nasty stuff in space not to mention they'd still not be efficient because they'd be eclipsed. so...we're right back to the surface again and there are two ways I know of to boil a shitload of water here, one is fossil fuels and the other is nuclear. I am going to go out on a limb here and say you don't like fossil fuels so the process of elimination leaves us with...nuclear.

Well, you can use a heated gas too. The least efficient is turning light into photovoltaic energy using what amounts to a combination battery and thermocouple. Using air pressure and movement to convert that to mechanical energy then electricity is a bit better but still inefficient.
 
Well, you can use a heated gas too. The least efficient is turning light into photovoltaic energy using what amounts to a combination battery and thermocouple. Using air pressure and movement to convert that to mechanical energy then electricity is a bit better but still inefficient.

Mechanical energy bothers me becuase it has a very short window of efficiency. Photovoltaic needs a storage matrix and with our current tech level guess what that will be made out of.

btw, I already know you know.
 
Except that too shows an ignorance of the true costs of solar.

Thankfully, facts on the ground relegate your complaint to ' sour grapes ' . You should take a drive through the magnificent turbine farms of Northern Spain. Or you could always get your lead suit on and go tour a Roentgen blaster. Careful with your nuts.
 
Thankfully, facts on the ground relegate your complaint to ' sour grapes ' . You should take a drive through the magnificent turbine farms of Northern Spain. Or you could always get your lead suit on and go tour a Roentgen blaster. Careful with your nuts.

How is solar powering a turbine farm?
 
Another point to make here about this moon fuckstick is that now the sun produces weather...I thought it was evil American industry producing the weather?
 
How? Why do you think this?

I think nuclear is the future and I can explain exactly why I think that...in excruciating detail. Can you do the same?
Nuclear is only the future if we can figure out fusion. Or maybe antimatter.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Great. I'll go first. Efficient energy generation is really nothing more than being able to boil water. Consistent delivery of energy means you've got to be ale to boil water 24/7. You like like wind and solar. Wind isn't 24/7, neither is solar...unless you're collecting solar in orbit. The problem with that is that you're not talking about solar anymore, you're talking about microwaves. They have to be sent down to the surface...to boil water and the collectors are subject to all kinds of nasty stuff in space not to mention they'd still not be efficient because they'd be eclipsed. so...we're right back to the surface again and there are two ways I know of to boil a shitload of water here, one is fossil fuels and the other is nuclear. I am going to go out on a limb here and say you don't like fossil fuels so the process of elimination leaves us with...nuclear.
Of course, there's always hydrogen as a way to store excess energy. It's also a fuel for vehicles.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Does the sun produce storage in order to make up for spikes and troughs dumbfuck?

That's the next problem to solve if we're to survive , you artless, rump-fed, mumble-news.
Think of it as Creation's survival test. Learn how to store the sun's free and abundant energy or fade away in a poison smog as a species.
Forget Mars. Totally fucking stupid population-pacifier.
 
That's the next problem to solve if we're to survive , you artless, rump-fed, mumble-news.
Think of it as Creation's survival test. Learn how to store the sun's free and abundant energy or fade away in a poison smog as a species.
Forget Mars. Totally fucking stupid population-pacifier.

Just top yourself MoonShi'ite, save us all from your poison smog.
 
Back
Top