APP - Harkin says bribes are just "small stuff"

AssHatZombie said:
But that panel sets the standard, according to the law. so. you're a fool.
Click to expand...

Really? Because if you had bothered to READ the article I provided, you'd know that what you state is not exactly the case.

But then again, honesty, decent comprehension skills and a basic knowledge of reality has never been your strong suit. Carry on.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Aren't the most screens possible the best way to mitigate the risk of breast cancer?
Click to expand...

It's not a prevention, just a detection to try and catch the early, more treatable stages of various breast cancers, or to determine benign lumps, etc.

As the article I presented earlier suggested, there has always been controversy as to the amount of radiation exposure that accumulates over time with more frequent mammographies. check this out:

http://www.healthe-livingnews.com/articles/death_by_medicine_part_2.html

With five scientifically documented books totaling over 2,800 pages, Dr. Gofman provides strong evidence that medical technology, specifically X-rays, CT scans, mammography, and fluoroscopy, are a contributing factor to 75 percent of new cancers.


His 699-page report, updated in 2000, “Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease: Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Population to here”90 shows that as the number of physicians increases in a geographical area with an increase in the number of X-ray diagnostic tests, there is an associated increase in the rate of cancer and ischemic heart disease. Dr. Gofman elaborates that it’s not X-rays alone that cause the damage but a combination of health risk factors including: poor diet, smoking, abortions, and the use of birth control pills. Dr. Gofman predicts that 100 million premature deaths over the next decade will be the result of ionizing radiation.


In his book, “Preventing Breast Cancer,” Dr. Gofman says that breast cancer is the leading cause of death among American women between the ages of 44 and 55. Because breast tissue is highly radiation-sensitive, mammograms can cause cancer. The danger can be heightened by a woman’s genetic makeup, preexisting benign breast disease, artificial menopause, obesity, and hormonal imbalance.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Yeah, just as I thought...ya got nothing.

Goodnight Gracie.
Click to expand...

My suggestion is for the Federal Government to print a pamphlet describing the high points of the health plan and sending it to every household. Time the distribution as close as possible to the November elections. :)
 
Taichiliberal said:
Yeah, just as I thought...ya got nothing.

Goodnight Gracie.
Click to expand...

I have everything.

The point here is that medical expenditures will all be polticized, politicized in the direction of the elitist "let them eat cake" model of the eugenics progressive movement.

The death panels will see to it.

They already made an attack on women's health, by trying to outlaw breast exams.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Yeah, just as I thought...ya got nothing.

Goodnight Gracie.
Click to expand...

apple0154 said:
My suggestion is for the Federal Government to print a pamphlet describing the high points of the health plan and sending it to every household. Time the distribution as close as possible to the November elections. :)
Click to expand...

Excellent idea--you should forward that to Howard Dean. Could you imagine the banshee wail from the neocon driven GOP if such a thing were done?
 
AssHatZombie said:
I have everything.

The point here is that medical expenditures will all be polticized, politicized in the direction of the elitist "let them eat cake" model of the eugenics progressive movement.

The death panels will see to it.

They already made an attack on women's health, by trying to outlaw breast exams.
Click to expand...


You're full of it, as usual.....you don't dare read anything that might provide proof which disproves the latest neocon talking point. You're a typical willfully ignorant, racist neocon coward, parroting the latest Rove talking point and dodging any rational, logical debate.

You're done. Take your ass in your pointed hood and just blather on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
You're full of it, as usual.....you don't dare read anything that might provide proof which disproves the latest neocon talking point. You're a typical willfully ignorant, racist neocon coward, parroting the latest Rove talking point and dodging any rational, logical debate.

You're done. Take your ass in your pointed hood and just blather on.
Click to expand...

You're done, fool.

Eugenicists want people to die. They want to cull the population for superior traits. Tragically, what's being selected is sheepdom, for sheeple like you.

Your inane blatherings are mental pollution.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You're done, fool.

Eugenicists want people to die. They want to cull the population for superior traits. Tragically, what's being selected is sheepdom, for sheeple like you.

Your inane blatherings are mental pollution.
Click to expand...

You're a liar and a willfully ignorant, racist little coward as well.


Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
A RECOMMENDATION, NOT a law. And NOTHING in the various health care reform proposals would prevent a woman from getting a yearly examine. Here, get educated on the pros and cons

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111602822.html
Click to expand...

The FACTS will always be your undoing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top