Why do you keep claiming a party has cheated yet fail to provide proof of it?
Have liberals ever taken a Civil class?
- Thread starter Eagle_Eye
- Start date
Why do you keep claiming a party has cheated yet fail to provide proof of it?
Typical loinfo response. Attack when beaten on the topic. I don't support a party. I have voted for dems, pubs, independents, green party, etc.
evince
Truthmatters
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-...consent-decree
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
November 5, 2016
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. *A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree.*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
cold hard court documented ass breathers
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
November 5, 2016
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. *A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree.*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
cold hard court documented ass breathers
Why do blacks have to get help doing things whites can do on their own?
For the record:
*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
Do you have the further evidence OR is the request still denied?
evince
Truthmatters
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree
want to comment on the first line assmouth
It is proof the republican party cheats minority Americans out of their rights to vote
want to comment on the first line assmouth
It is proof the republican party cheats minority Americans out of their rights to vote
I don’t need a Civil class, I am usually very civil.
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
I'll assume you're talking about a Civics class. Sadly for world decorum, civil classes are not offered any more.
Why yes, this liberal took one in 9th grade. It was mandatory for graduation, in fact. Perhaps you're mistaking "Hillary won the popular vote" for "Hillary won." Sorry. Next?
lol
Get back to reality, pally. You want to play “take that away”? Great, let’s do that.
Orangetweet won the electoral vote with 77,000 votes in 3 states. Take that 77,000 away and he loses.
See how that works, pally?
That ruling says nothing about what those voter ID laws are intended to do. That the rate of turnout was higher does not mean that votes were not suppressed, either. You are merely making an assumption that may or may not be true.
To dilute and frustrate the momentary, ignorant whims of the majority.
With a deep voice and vulgar disposition.
Not really. But I am sure glad we use the electoral college, pally, so that a few relatively small pockets of your whackjob progressives pallys aren't dictating policy to the rest of the country.
Those framers sure were smart.
UNDERSTAND how that works, pally? LMMFAO!
It is quite simple. There is no merit to the voter suppression argument concerning voter ID. When people want to vote they are able to vote. Simple as that.
He won and Hillary didn't. See how that works, BOY?
They aren't intended to do what you race pimps automatically go to when you don't like something.
Why can't black people get what white people are able to get without help?
Is that what you call it when you kiss Obama's ass, a public service?