Have liberals ever taken a Civil class?

evince said:
https://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q76.html



Constitutional FAQ Answer #76



<<Previous Question | Question Index | Subject Index | Constitutional Index | Next Question>>
Q76. "Is the United States a constitutional republic? Is one of the purposes of a constitutional republic to protect the rights of minorities from the tyranny of the majority?"
A. The United States is a federal republic and a constitutional representative democracy.
The "federal" part is one of three basic types of organization of power — unitary, confederal, and federal. Most nations are unitary in nature (local government with a powerful national government). There are no confederacies that I know of at this time (the U.S., under the Articles of Confederation was one; Germany and Switzerland have also had confederate systems in the past). Federal systems are common among large nations where several levels of government are needed. Australia, Canada, and Brazil are federal as well. Federations do not always work, such as in the case of the United Arab Republic.
Click to expand...

Who is arguing with you?
 
evince said:
thyen go get a link to them and lets discuss it

you know I will kick your russian ass huh
Click to expand...

Prolly not.

The framers were afraid of pure democracy. Mob Rule, factions, the majority forcing their will on the minority. In addition, the Executive Branch, the President, was not there to cater to the people. He was there to protect the Republic. The House was created to be our direct representation. The Senate was created to represent the states. The President to oversee it all.

Your state is where all of your little wants and needs could be addressed using the purer or truer democratic process. I posted that once already but of course your reading skills are rather low.
 
evince said:
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree



DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
November 5, 2016






In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. *A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree.*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
Click to expand...

republicans CHEAT AMERICAN VOTERS OUT OF THEIR RIGHTS


why do you avoid those cold hard facts?
 
then electorial college was cheated too idiot.


get it russian asshole


the founders did not form this country to save the electorail college huh.

they formed it for the people.

stupid fucking russian
 
evince said:
then electorial college was cheated too idiot.


get it russian asshole


the founders did not form this country to save the electorail college huh.

they formed it for the people.

stupid fucking russian
Click to expand...

You might want to read this post of yours then re-evaluate who is coming across as stupid.

Or try not drinking in the afternoon.
 
evince said:
you did not adress them lying asshole


go get the post number in which you claim you did
Click to expand...

Nah, gettin' tired of repeating for you.

But I will ask exactly what do you want me to say? If they are vote caging those who are actually doing it need to suffer the consequences. If you want me to paint the entire party as bad for doing it, well, you are out of luck.
 
Huey said:
Nah, gettin' tired of repeating for you.

But I will ask exactly what do you want me to say? If they are vote caging those who are actually doing it need to suffer the consequences. If you want me to paint the entire party as bad for doing it, well, you are out of luck.
Click to expand...

there is no post where you adressed it huh lying foreskin lips.


yu russians are so easy to kick to the curb

I guess its why you cant get your own democracy
 
evince said:
there is no post where you adressed it huh lying foreskin lips.


yu russians are so easy to kick to the curb

I guess its why you cant get your own democracy
Click to expand...

Since you kiss Obama's ass, shall we refer to you as nigger lips?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top