Have liberals ever taken a Civil class?

evince said:
BOT from Russia cant answer


is not programed to do so
Click to expand...

You will have to be more specific. I think you are lamely referring to the voter rights act, specifically section 5, where certain jurisdictions and states had to get permission to change voting rules. This stems from the voter rights act of 65 and most of the jurisdictions covered were democrat at the time.

For your edification, if you bother to read it:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/section-five-voting-rights-act-map/
 
evince said:
post 14


they refuse to discuss the court documented cold hard facts that prove the republican party cheats to win
Click to expand...

Can you explain why minority turnout in states with voter ID laws increased or stayed even in the 06 midterms, the 08 elections, the 10 elections and the 12 elections? That is cold hard statistical facts.
 
you refuse to discuss the COLD HARD COURT DOCUMENTED FACTS IVE PROVIDED


the courts have deamed many of the voter ID laws discriminatory


The scotus has REFUSED to take these cases.

BOOM


our system deemed many of these laws written by republicans illegal and bent on hurting LEGAL American voters.


Your team cheats voters


The consent decree the court forced the republican party into DECADES ago was put there for them cheating black voters
 
Huey said:
Can you explain why minority turnout in states with voter ID laws increased or stayed even in the 06 midterms, the 08 elections, the 10 elections and the 12 elections? That is cold hard statistical facts.
Click to expand...

It looks like he can't explain it.
 
evince said:
you refuse to discuss the COLD HARD COURT DOCUMENTED FACTS IVE PROVIDED


the courts have deamed many of the voter ID laws discriminatory


The scotus has REFUSED to take these cases.

BOOM


our system deemed many of these laws written by republicans illegal and bent on hurting LEGAL American voters.


Your team cheats voters


The consent decree the court forced the republican party into DECADES ago was put there for them cheating black voters
Click to expand...

You didn't even bother to read your links. ID laws remain in place. There were other restrictions that you were ordered removed. You should read your own articles, loinfo.

And what decree was the republican party forced into? I asked you about it, and explained it, but you are wearing blinders so you failed to see.
 
Huey said:
You will have to be more specific. I think you are lamely referring to the voter rights act, specifically section 5, where certain jurisdictions and states had to get permission to change voting rules. This stems from the voter rights act of 65 and most of the jurisdictions covered were democrat at the time.

For your edification, if you bother to read it:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/section-five-voting-rights-act-map/
Click to expand...

evince said:
you refuse to discuss the COLD HARD COURT DOCUMENTED FACTS IVE PROVIDED


the courts have deamed many of the voter ID laws discriminatory


The scotus has REFUSED to take these cases.

BOOM


our system deemed many of these laws written by republicans illegal and bent on hurting LEGAL American voters.


Your team cheats voters


The consent decree the court forced the republican party into DECADES ago was put there for them cheating black voters
Click to expand...

Hello?
 
evince said:
No problem

typos are meaningless


lets work on the facts


they mean something


when I give you the fully documented facts will you accept them?
Click to expand...

If they applied to the subject. Where many ordinary Americans, refer to the United States as a democracy. Others find this aggravating because, unlike in a democracy where citizens vote directly on laws, in the United States, elected representatives do – and, therefore, the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy. As I said many liberals are ignorant in civics and like you keep trying to sell the myth the US is a democracy!
 
it is being fully blown OBVIOUS this russin bot can not discuss the FACT that the republican party has cheated voters of color for decades and the Entire USA courts right up to the SCOTUS KNOW IT.


completely court documented russo bot


admitt these court documents are here for you to see and you dont want to amitt they are here
 
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree



DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
November 5, 2016






In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. *A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree.*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
 
Real McCoy said:
If they applied to the subject. Where many ordinary Americans, refer to the United States as a democracy. Others find this aggravating because, unlike in a democracy where citizens vote directly on laws, in the United States, elected representatives do – and, therefore, the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy. As I said many liberals are ignorant in civics and like you keep trying to sell the myth the US is a democracy!
Click to expand...

there are NOT alternative facts.


we are a democratic republic


you dont get to pretend its your choice

words have set meanings.
 
Real McCoy said:
If they applied to the subject. Where many ordinary Americans, refer to the United States as a democracy. Others find this aggravating because, unlike in a democracy where citizens vote directly on laws, in the United States, elected representatives do – and, therefore, the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy. As I said many liberals are ignorant in civics and like you keep trying to sell the myth the US is a democracy!
Click to expand...


YOU are mixing up the definitiions of several terms


democracy


pure democracy


direct democracy




the first one is not the same as the last two


the last two are the same


stop lying
 
evince said:
there are NOT alternative facts.


we are a democratic republic


you dont get to pretend its your choice

words have set meanings.
Click to expand...

Yes they do have meaning. Unfortunately, the first two times you mentioned democracy you failed to mention we are a representative republic following democratic principles. It wasn't until after this was pointed out to you that you decided to throw in republic. Many of the framers were afraid of pure democracy.

So yes, junior, words do have meaning.
 
Huey said:
Yes they do have meaning. Unfortunately, the first two times you mentioned democracy you failed to mention we are a representative republic following democratic principles. It wasn't until after this was pointed out to you.

So yes, junior, words do have meaning.
Click to expand...

fuck off russian lie bot


reread the definition of democracy by merriam websters you idiot russian.
 
evince said:
fuck off russian lie bot


reread the definition of democracy by merriam websters you idiot russian.
Click to expand...

I did. We are not discussing the definition of a democracy. We are discussing the formation of the republic and a representative republic. You with us, loinfo?
 
https://www.britannica.com/topic/direct-democracy



Direct democracy, also called pure democracy, forms of direct participation of citizens in democratic decision making in contrast to indirect or representative democracy, based on the sovereignty of the people. This can happen in the form of an assembly democracy or by initiative and referendum with ballot voting, with direct voting on issues instead of for candidates or parties. Sometimes the term is also used for electing representatives in a direct vote as opposed to indirect elections (by voting for an electing body, electoral college, etc.) as well as for recalling elected officeholders. Direct democracy may be understood as a full-scale system of political institutions, but in modern times, it means most often specific decision-making institutions in the broader system environment of representative democracy.
 
you russin fucks want to KILL our democracy


its why you fucked with our elections


eat shit commrade


your shit aint going to stand
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top