Have liberals ever taken a Civil class?

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|



WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
 
evince said:
you russin fucks want to KILL our democracy


its why you fucked with our elections


eat shit commrade


your shit aint going to stand
Click to expand...

LMAO! The dude is running out of steam.

You need to up your game, junior. You can save the insults. They have no effect on me.
 
Huey said:
I guess next time you try and impress us with your knowledge you will choose you words cautiously. Since the country is NOT A PURE DEMOCRACY it is not relevant who wins the popular vote.
Click to expand...

poor little russian doesnt understand whatw a democracy is


better go chop some more wood


your shitty performance is not going to get you transfered out of Siberia any time soon.
 
evince said:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|



WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
Click to expand...

what did you say about this russian fucktard?
 
evince said:
what did you say about this russian fucktard?
Click to expand...

Voter caging? LMAO

This says it all:

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
 
evince said:
poor little russian doesnt understand whatw a democracy is


better go chop some more wood


your shitty performance is not going to get you transfered out of Siberia any time soon.
Click to expand...

I understand what a democracy is. I don't understand what your first sentence says.

I know that this country is a representative republic that uses democratic principles. The question is do you understand it?

And to take it a step further there is a reason the truer, or purer, democratic process occurs at the state level. Look it up sometime.
 
and you are glad they have been able to juke the courts?


spoken like a real fucking traitor to democracy


go chop some more wood


it gets COLD in siberia
 
Real McCoy said:
I keep seeing liberals claiming Hillary won because she got 3 million more votes! Don't they understand we elect the president by the candidate who get's the most Electoral College Votes?
Click to expand...

you didnt even know the meaning of the word democracy fool
 
Huey said:
I understand what a democracy is. I don't understand what your first sentence says.

I know that this country is a representative republic that uses democratic principles. The question is do you understand it?

And to take it a step further there is a reason the truer, or purer, democratic process occurs at the state level. Look it up sometime.
Click to expand...

hey fucking idiot,


a republic is a type of democracy


when I bring you those FACTS to prove that will you lie about them too?
 
evince said:
hey fucking idiot,


a republic is a type of democracy


when I bring you those FACTS to prove that will you lie about them too?
Click to expand...

I am so glad you agree with me. Why are you such an angry little man? You sound like leo from Lethal Weapon, dude.
 
https://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q76.html



Constitutional FAQ Answer #76



<<Previous Question | Question Index | Subject Index | Constitutional Index | Next Question>>
Q76. "Is the United States a constitutional republic? Is one of the purposes of a constitutional republic to protect the rights of minorities from the tyranny of the majority?"
A. The United States is a federal republic and a constitutional representative democracy.
The "federal" part is one of three basic types of organization of power — unitary, confederal, and federal. Most nations are unitary in nature (local government with a powerful national government). There are no confederacies that I know of at this time (the U.S., under the Articles of Confederation was one; Germany and Switzerland have also had confederate systems in the past). Federal systems are common among large nations where several levels of government are needed. Australia, Canada, and Brazil are federal as well. Federations do not always work, such as in the case of the United Arab Republic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top