He stood his ground?!! (Not?!!)

Truth Detector said:
This is your brain on dunce; don't do dunce. I'll be quoting you on this one shit-for-brains.

If there is still anyone here wondering what a low information voting dunce that voted for Obama might look like, your search has ended.
Click to expand...


Typical bullshit partisan non-response.

Does it refute the points I made?

Oh HELL no!

Or does it just engage in the same petty derision we've come to expect from trolls like Defective?

That's all it ever has, why should this time be any different?

ROTFLMAO!!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
See that's the thing. I suggest some sort of written/firing test without even getting into specifics and already your red flags are going off.

We haven't even discussed what "sort" of written/firing test might be administered and you've already dismissed it because it doesn't "do a whole lot".

But you see, you've already made it clear that you are already against any sort of regulation that does "do whole a lot".

So I am done coming up with what I feel are reasonable suggestions only to be told everything I might suggest is going too far...you tell me...what is your grand plan for keeping your nieces safe, short of arming every single person in the country?
Click to expand...

Ok, what type of written/firing test did you have in mind, what kind of affects would you expect to see from it and how do you see it being administered?
 
cawacko said:
Ok, what type of written/firing test did you have in mind, what kind of affects would you expect to see from it and how do you see it being administered?
Click to expand...

No, I want to hear from you.

What would be acceptable to you.

How would Y-O-U stop these shooting sprees?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No, I want to hear from you.

What would be acceptable to you.

How would Y-O-U stop these shooting sprees?
Click to expand...

So I can't ask to hear your ideas now?

I'm not a gun guy. I don't know all the gun rules so on this issue I can't tell you we should do this, this and this. It's why I said I'm open to hearing what should be done. It's why I asked to hear your opinion/description of the legislation you would like to see.
 
cawacko said:
So I can't ask to hear your ideas now?

I'm not a gun guy. I don't know all the gun rules so on this issue I can't tell you we should do this, this and this. It's why I said I'm open to hearing what should be done. It's why I asked to hear your opinion/description of the legislation you would like to see.
Click to expand...


I've given my ideas time and again and every time they've been laughed right out of the building.

Right here in this thread you just dismissed my idea of testing gun owners every other year claiming it wouldn't "do a whole lot".

Well I want to hear some other people's ideas for a change...all you people who think my ideas won't "do a whole lot" have got to have some ideas of your own, right?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I've given my ideas time and again and every time they've been laughed right out of the building.

Right here in this thread you just dismissed my idea of testing gun owners every other year claiming it wouldn't "do a whole lot".

Well I want to hear some other people's ideas for a change...all you people who think my ideas won't "do a whole lot" have got to have some ideas of your own, right?
Click to expand...

What would be the specifics of your written/firing test. Maybe I over looked the positives of them. It wouldn't be the first time I jumped to a conclusion on an issue to fast. What kind of affects would you expect to see from the tests and how do you see it being administered?
 
movie-murder-florida.jpg
 
cawacko said:
What would be the specifics of your written/firing test. Maybe I over looked the positives of them. It wouldn't be the first time I jumped to a conclusion on an issue to fast. What kind of affects would you expect to see from the tests and how do you see it being administered?
Click to expand...

This will be good.
 
cawacko said:
So I can't ask to hear your ideas now?

I'm not a gun guy. I don't know all the gun rules so on this issue I can't tell you we should do this, this and this. It's why I said I'm open to hearing what should be done. It's why I asked to hear your opinion/description of the legislation you would like to see.
Click to expand...


But you apparently think you know enough to dismiss outright any suggestion I might make.

Now I find Dim Bulb Billy salivating, just waiting for me to post my thoughts so he and his Gun Nut buddies can IMMEDIATELY begin hurling their derisive taunts.

You are ALWAYS so eager to hear our ideas, but no matter what is suggested, as soon as our thoughts are posted, the taunts and attacks begin.

If someone tries to suggest even the most minimal of regulations, you pooh pooh it as not doing "a whole lot", and of course any suggestion of REAL regulation gets shouted down with bleats of how we want to "take away all guns" and how "God gave you the right to own guns".
 
ZappasGuitar said:
But you apparently think you know enough to dismiss outright any suggestion I might make.

Now I find Dim Bulb Billy salivating, just waiting for me to post my thoughts so he and his Gun Nut buddies can IMMEDIATELY begin hurling their derisive taunts.

You are ALWAYS so eager to hear our ideas, but no matter what is suggested, as soon as our thoughts are posted, the taunts and attacks begin.

If someone tries to suggest even the most minimal of regulations, you pooh pooh it as not doing "a whole lot", and of course any suggestion of REAL regulation gets shouted down with bleats of how we want to "take away all guns" and how "God gave you the right to own guns".
Click to expand...

Jeez dude, how is saying I disagree with the idea of a written test and a firing test taunting you or attacking you? Are people not allowed to have differing opinions without it being deemed a personal attack?

I acknowledged my own shortcomings in saying I didn't hear the specific details of your idea and asked what those details are and yet that is taunting you or attacking you? I don't get that.
 
cawacko said:
Jeez dude, how is saying I disagree with the idea of a written test and a firing test taunting you or attacking you? Are people not allowed to have differing opinions without it being deemed a personal attack?

I acknowledged my own shortcomings in saying I didn't hear the specific details of your idea and asked what those details are and yet that is taunting you or attacking you? I don't get that.
Click to expand...

It's because he doesn't actually know, and he knows he doesn't know.
 
Stand Your Ground Mentality, Ideed!

If this piece of shit get's off using this asinine law made up for cowards with guns, I would like to see an economic boycott against the state of Florida until they repeal the stand your ground law!

011814coletoon.jpg
 
ZappasGuitar said:
See that's the thing. I suggest some sort of written/firing test without even getting into specifics and already your red flags are going off.

We haven't even discussed what "sort" of written/firing test might be administered and you've already dismissed it because it doesn't "do a whole lot".

But you see, you've already made it clear that you are already against any sort of regulation that does "do whole a lot".

So I am done coming up with what I feel are reasonable suggestions only to be told everything I might suggest is going too far...you tell me...what is your grand plan for keeping your nieces safe, short of arming every single person in the country?
Click to expand...

Jesus; have some cheese with that effeminate whine vagina man. God you're a pathetic dunce.

 
signalmankenneth said:
If this piece of shit get's off using this asinine law made up for cowards with guns, I would like to see an economic boycott against the state of Florida until they repeal the stand your ground law!
Click to expand...

Really shit-for-brains? A law for cowards with guns? One can only hope that someday assholes like you get mugged by a bunch of thugs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top