IBDaMann
Well-known member
The Big Bang is not science. Nobody gets to hang the "scientific" label on it.The most accepted scientific theory is the big bang theory
Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan. The Big Bang is consistent with observations and with the rest of science, but it is nothing more than speculation about the unobserved past.
Oh, and science is not a subjective matter of opinion, nor is science determined by any sort of consensus or democratic vote. The idea of how accepted the Big Bang might be is totally irrelevant. There is no quantity of "acceptance" that magically transforms speculation into science.
Regarding your statement above, it really would have to be reworded to be correct. Creationism (in some form) is the most widely accepted theory, because it includes fans of the Big Bang theory who believe that God/Allah/[pick your favorite deity] caused the Big Bang. Coming in second is pure Big Bang with no theistic component. You and I will have to be content with the #2 slot.
My personal speculation is that only hydrogen was formed first, and then all other elements were formed via fusion.The big bang created only a few elements,