PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello goat,
Thanks for turning me onto that book. Sounds like something I would be interested in reading. Although I noticed a discrepancy between the review I read and your take on it. The review said the mass media. It didn't mention anything about the 'government owned media,' whatever that is. For PBS and NPR, the government does not produce nor influence the content.
I am a regular PBS and NPR listener and do not recall any branding of anything as un-American. Can you cite an example?
I agree the Patriot Act was sort of the opposite of what the name implies.
Young people have a right to be frustrated with the lack of opportunity. I have been arguing for years that it is tougher to make it these days then it used to be. And it is still getting tougher as time passes. I fault improperly regulated capitalism for that. The goal of capitalism is to reward the owners of capital with as much wealth as possible by always seeking a greater ROI. This means eliminating labor costs. Jobs are downsized and menial tasks cut out to be done by machines or the lowest paid workers. The goal is to reduce the number of higher paid workers, and get the most profitable productivity out of them. The ideal capitalist venture would have no workers at all. That is actively being sought.
I don't see how we can continue to expand our population and reduce the number of well-paying jobs. That is logically going to lead to extreme wealth inequality. And that is precisely what is occurring. There is already an insufficient number of well-paying jobs.
It appears inevitable that we will one day be forced to institute a UBI, and we will tax the rich to pay for it. I think it may be time to start that up right now. But that idea is ahead of the curve as far as social acceptance goes. How do you tell someone who worked their butt off to get ahead that he needs to pay for free college for younger people after he worked his own way through college? And then try to tell him that after he has worked for decades to build a retirement that he should be taxed to pay for others to not work. Tough sell.
It's called Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a 1988 book by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky. It shows how our government owned media allows people to think they are making the choice to go to war or take a vaccine but in reality it's being forced on us by branding dissent as un-American. True patriots see the patriot act as a repeal of habeas corpus and the bill of rights.
Young folk are fed up with the lack of opportunity. The gig economy is coming to an end because zoomers want more out of life than driving a car to pay for the room they rent or share with a stranger. Can we agree that this is what we've become as a society?
Thanks for turning me onto that book. Sounds like something I would be interested in reading. Although I noticed a discrepancy between the review I read and your take on it. The review said the mass media. It didn't mention anything about the 'government owned media,' whatever that is. For PBS and NPR, the government does not produce nor influence the content.
I am a regular PBS and NPR listener and do not recall any branding of anything as un-American. Can you cite an example?
I agree the Patriot Act was sort of the opposite of what the name implies.
Young people have a right to be frustrated with the lack of opportunity. I have been arguing for years that it is tougher to make it these days then it used to be. And it is still getting tougher as time passes. I fault improperly regulated capitalism for that. The goal of capitalism is to reward the owners of capital with as much wealth as possible by always seeking a greater ROI. This means eliminating labor costs. Jobs are downsized and menial tasks cut out to be done by machines or the lowest paid workers. The goal is to reduce the number of higher paid workers, and get the most profitable productivity out of them. The ideal capitalist venture would have no workers at all. That is actively being sought.
I don't see how we can continue to expand our population and reduce the number of well-paying jobs. That is logically going to lead to extreme wealth inequality. And that is precisely what is occurring. There is already an insufficient number of well-paying jobs.
It appears inevitable that we will one day be forced to institute a UBI, and we will tax the rich to pay for it. I think it may be time to start that up right now. But that idea is ahead of the curve as far as social acceptance goes. How do you tell someone who worked their butt off to get ahead that he needs to pay for free college for younger people after he worked his own way through college? And then try to tell him that after he has worked for decades to build a retirement that he should be taxed to pay for others to not work. Tough sell.