Hello goat,
People who choose the public sector, especially public servants, are mediocre at best. Most politicians are pathological egotists who you are willing to vote for time after time. Me on the other hand is a flawed humane person who learns something new everyday, yet you admit to have zero tolerance for. You have to be willing to compromise with me if I unintentionally hurt your feelings. People (authority) have been trying to polish me my entire life.
You ignored both of my questions but only one is important. Why would a government of the people need militarized police? The answer is simple; the people in power know what's coming. They have beaten down the masses to the point of revolt. Odds are it will happen in our lifetime. White suburbia has to be willing to side with humanity when the streets are filled with justifiably angry souls.
I don't know if I have zero tolerance for you or not. So far you haven't disrespected me or made anything personal. We've been talking about politics, not me. I don't come here to be the subject of discussion. I just want to make sure that anybody new understands I will not tolerate being abused. I actively shut that down as soon as it begins, for good reason.
I do take a hard line on internet abuse. I'm sure I place some on Ignore who really might have ended up being good chat partners. But I have to maintain the hard line image that creates. I don't give much latitude on disrespect. I cut people off at the first instance of it. The reason I do that is basic. If someone insults me one time, that's on them. If it happens a second time, that's on me for not cutting them off after they already showed me they will insult me.
And the thing is, I am spoiled. I have no problem spoiling myself in this way. This site is vast. No way I want to spend enough time here to keep up with every conversation. So, if I am only going to get a small slice of the talk here, I want it to be of the highest caliber.
That's why I do this unusual thing of being very open and out front about my approach here. I want everybody to understand there are no second chances. As soon as I get the idea somebody doesn't respect me, they get poofed. I have no interest in being part of an enabler/abuser relationship. Insult me once, shame on the other person, insult me twice, shame on me.
I don't claim to be perfect. I make mistakes. I try to analyze very carefully if I should place a name on Ignore, each time I do it. Sometimes it's an easy choice. Other times I anguish over it. Because I know: Once I do that, I am never undoing it. It's permanent.
The permanent part of it works because that makes it final. Forever is a long time. I want people to understand how serious I am about this. If they don't care to bother with my concerns then I am happy to disassociate from them.
I don't want to get into your personal issues. But I will share one aspect of it. Part of my decision depends on how long I have been chatting with a person. People who have shown me for a long time in regular chat that they respect me, if they mess up and go a little too far, I might PM them and try to work it out, maybe give them another chance. Maybe even make them a friend out of it. But if somebody just showed up here and does the same exact thing? I am usually inclined to just cut it off right there before it turns into a thing. If I have no history with them, then I have no reason to cut any slack.
You wondered how to address me. Just use my screen name here. Or PT works if that's easier. People who have modified my name to make fun or as a slam? Those types are already on the Ignore List. Rewriting my posts is another quick way on.
As for militarized police. Yeah, that's a toughie. There are times when the response is too great, and there are other times, as we all saw on January 6th, when they lacked what they needed to get the job done. I don't like the trend of the MIC forcing unneeded weapons into the armed forces, and then the forces selling off their used stuff to the local police. That sets up a scenario where we can see too much force being used. Policing is delicate. Obviously more work needs to be done to optimize policing.
It's a bit troubling, your talk about 'white suburbia.' I don't think neighborhoods should be segregated. I am glad to see vast mixing of races and ethnicity. Diversity makes America great. We need to be moving more towards racial acceptance than a race war. I do not agree that anything is inevitable. I don't see a revolt coming at all. What I see is a bunch of disgruntled malcontents who have been itching for a show-down with government, and they got their desire on Jan 6th. That was attention-getting, but really, compared to the population of the USA? That was very very few people. No, I don't see any revolution coming.
What I see is that the most motivated people who want to fight government all came out on Jan 6th, and now they are being systematically rounded up. Last I heard, there have been 453 arrests. And they are not done. As fast as they are rounded up and made to understand the serious trouble they are in, they flip on their friends. Or the FBI digs and finds them. We might eventually see 1000 arrests.
So there goes the revolution. The most likely people to take an active part are all being taken out of circulation as we speak. And anybody else who is thinking of more violence has to be watching all of that and wondering if they want to have their 15 minutes of fame followed by the rest of their life paying for it.
We're getting off subject here.
Obviously the idea of natural herd immunity is compromised by the fact that the virus can mutate before herd occurs, and that just resets the clock. Vaccines are the answer.
Do you agree that most people need to get vaccinated in order to finish the job and get our country back to normal?