Hero Cop Will Not Be Charged

Shot an unarmed who was zero threat to him. Only some fucked in the head person like yourself would consider that kind of cowardice heroic.

That depends on whether you think shooting Bin Laden (ANOTHER FUCKING TERRORIST LIKE THAT TRUMPTARDED BITCH) was a cowardice act or just taking care of our best interests by setting this example to the world- THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO TERRORISTS THAT TRIES TO DESTROY OUR GOVERNMENT, KILL OUR PEOPLE, AND DESTROY OUR PROPERTY!

BITCH GOT WHAT SHE DESERVED JUST LIKE BIN LADEN! HE ATTACKED AMERICA- SHE ATTACKED AMERICA! NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE!
 
Agreed about Democrats, but I think you are overinvested in your faith in Republicans as truth-tellers and standard bearers for morality. ;)

It's largely a bipartisan but Americans are not required to choose either one. It's a matter of public agreement on supporting standards of conduct regardless of political ideology. It's a cultural thing and We, the People, don't have it.

I do not think that at all. There is a reason I am not a member of either party. Basically both are useless as tits on a nun. democrats though over the last 4 years and now are doing their best to show how fucking crazy they are and how much they will sell this country down the river for power and votes.
 
That depends on whether you think shooting Bin Laden (ANOTHER FUCKING TERRORIST LIKE THAT TRUMPTARDED BITCH) was a cowardice act or just taking care of our best interests by setting this example to the world- THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO TERRORISTS THAT TRIES TO DESTROY OUR GOVERNMENT, KILL OUR PEOPLE, AND DESTROY OUR PROPERTY!

BITCH GOT WHAT SHE DESERVED JUST LIKE BIN LADEN!

Go take a nap old man.
 
Those officers are probably going to be charged with crimes. The majority tried to hold back the crowd, or as Gold Medal recipient Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman did, misdirected them. One officer died, over a 100 were injured, many maimed. That's not the same party you were trying to describe.

No one should get a pass on any crimes committed on 1/6 regardless of political or other affiliations.

n91TxkR.jpg

You’re suggesting the cops who waved the crowd by were involved in a conspiracy lol?

Let’s invoke Occam’s Razor since it’s been in play recently. The simplest explanation for the cops behavior is they didn’t perceive that aspect of the crowd to be a threat. So they allowed them in.

Simple. Not conspiracy necessary.

And in fact, that speaks to the subtext in this whole thing: the lack of preparation on the part of the Capitol Cops—and more specifically, members of Congress who were ultimately responsible for security preparedness that day. Not to mention any names, but a certain ‘Nancy’ played a critical role in that.

Granted, the lack of security was understandable since Trump supporters had a well established record of behaving themselves when gathered in large crowds. And in fact, that track record goes all the way back to the Tea Party days. So even though there were tens of thousands of Trump supporters protesting sketchy election results, there were in fact, some grounds to suspect no great trouble would arise out of it.

Regarding *the only* victim of homicide that day it would be nice to lay eyes on the report that cleared the cop because it clearly looked as if lethal force wasn’t necessary on an *unarmed* woman climbing through a broken window. Had she come in guns a blazing it would be different but she was climbing through a window and shot in the neck. That’s a kill shot. Isn’t that what they call it in the military?

Or put it this way, we’ve watched whole city blocks be destroyed when a perp is reaching for a weapon and gets killed by a cop and this woman was climbing through a window—and basically taken out.

Apparently this was ‘different’ for some reason. It would be nice to see how they arrived at that conclusion. Or whether it was contrived to suit an agenda.
 
I do not think that at all. There is a reason I am not a member of either party. Basically both are useless as tits on a nun. democrats though over the last 4 years and now are doing their best to show how fucking crazy they are and how much they will sell this country down the river for power and votes.

Why do you think that is?
 
You’re suggesting the cops who waved the crowd by were involved in a conspiracy lol?

Let’s invoke Occam’s Razor since it’s been in play recently. The simplest explanation for the cops behavior is they didn’t perceive that aspect of the crowd to be a threat. So they allowed them in.

Simple. Not conspiracy necessary.

And in fact, that speaks to the subtext in this whole thing: the lack of preparation on the part of the Capitol Cops—and more specifically, members of Congress who were ultimately responsible for security preparedness that day. Not to mention any names, but a certain ‘Nancy’ played a critical role in that.

Granted, the lack of security was understandable since Trump supporters had a well established record of behaving themselves when gathered in large crowds. And in fact, that track record goes all the way back to the Tea Party days. So even though there were tens of thousands of Trump supporters protesting sketchy election results, there were in fact, some grounds to suspect no great trouble would arise out of it.

Regarding *the only* victim of homicide that day it would be nice to lay eyes on the report that cleared the cop because it clearly looked as if lethal force wasn’t necessary on an *unarmed* woman climbing through a broken window. Had she come in guns a blazing it would be different but she was climbing through a window and shot in the neck. That’s a kill shot. Isn’t that what they call it in the military?

Or put it this way, we’ve watched whole city blocks be destroyed when a perp is reaching for a weapon and gets killed by a cop and this woman was climbing through a window—and basically taken out.

Apparently this was ‘different’ for some reason. It would be nice to see how they arrived at that conclusion. Or whether it was contrived to suit an agenda.
Sympathizers and others who are complicit in the actions of others should be held accountable for their actions. Why do you seem to be against this idea?

Is it politics or morality? If morality, based upon what?
 
Biden could be as fucked up as Trump and it still doesn't change the Constitution.


....or Congress. :flagsal:

Their assault on the Constitution will come when they are more fully in control. But the preparation has begun.

45 Communist Goals (The Blaze)


29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


And replace our nation of "laws, not men" with royal decree emanating from appointed judges and executive orders. Replace elected officials with bureaucrats.



45. Repeal the Connally Reservation so the U.S. cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.



This would mark a complete subversion of our Constitution and an end to representative sovereign government as we know it, which is the whole idea.


https://www.theblaze.com/45-communist-goals
 
Back
Top