Hey remember when Flash said the GOP wouldn't go after gay marriage or birth control?

But Thomas did, after Alito's opinion was already circulated and voted upon.

You only need the consensus of 4 justices in order for a legal challenge to be heard in SCOTUS. So if we take you at your word, and that Justice Penis Head and Justice Beer Keg don't agree with Thomas' legal rationale, that still leaves 4 other Nazi justices who probably do.

There is no law to challenge.
 
Yes, I was wrong just like you were wrong about Alito and Kavanaugh saying the Dobbs case does not affect the other right to privacy cases.

Again, only 4 SCOTUS justices need to agree to hear a legal challenge, so if you take out Beer Keg and Penis Head, how many Nazi judges are still left?
 
There is no law to challenge.

Not yet, but there will be and it will be very soon:

But in the fine print of their measure, those Republicans revealed that their ambition wasn’t only to target a familiar abortion foe. They were going after specific forms of birth control as well, notably, emergency contraceptives, often sold under the brand name Plan B, and intrauterine devices, known as IUDs. GOP lawmakers tried to stop Missouri’s Medicaid agency from paying for those forms of contraception.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/resear...me-states-already-are-targeting-birth-control
 
Alito and Kavanaugh also said that Roe was established precedent and law and both just voted that it wasn't.

So what I don't understand is why you believe this after those Nazi judges already lied to your face?

Are you fucking stupid or just incredibly naive?

Believe them? You just told us they did not say those protections are safe. Now you are telling us they did say it but are lying.

It is much easier to make predictions and insults than actually reading the cases. Lazy ass.
 
I don't think most legal scholars, justices, and lawyers are extremist reactionaries.

But you didn't listen to any of those people who warned that this was coming, of which there were plenty of legal scholars, justices, and lawyers who warned you...you chose to ignore those warnings because you thought you knew more than the rest of us.

Your knee-jerk response was to call those warning that this would happen "hysterical".

So for every instance where you said we were overreacting, your judgment was so fucking fucked that you really had no fucking clue what was happening.

Clueless is what you were and are.

What I don't understand is since your instincts and judgment has already steered you wrong and been proven as poor, you still insist that you know what you're talking about.

That is arrogance.
 
Emotional exaggerations. I never scream about anything, I just said I did not think they would overturn Roe.

You just admitted in an earlier post that you were completely fucking wrong with your assessment of where things were headed in 2016.

WE TOLD YOU IN 2016 THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN, and your response was to act like a fucking asshole and insist that everyone was overreacting and only YOU had a calm, collected, and rational mindset.

Turns out your mindset was arrogant gullibility.

You're not as perceptive, instinctual, intelligent, or savvy as you want everyone to think. You got played because you enjoy the smell of your own farts too much.
 
But you didn't listen to any of those people who warned that this was coming, of which there were plenty of legal scholars, justices, and lawyers who warned you...you chose to ignore those warnings because you thought you knew more than the rest of us.

Your knee-jerk response was to call those warning that this would happen "hysterical".

So for every instance where you said we were overreacting, your judgment was so fucking fucked that you really had no fucking clue what was happening.

Clueless is what you were and are.

What I don't understand is since your instincts and judgment has already steered you wrong and been proven as poor, you still insist that you know what you're talking about.

That is arrogance.


Like the warning the 2020 election would be cancelled? Gosh, I wonder why I did not heed that warning.

When you claim the sky if falling about everything that happens you are bound to be right sooner or later. So far, you are one for about 20.
 
I just proved you wrong about the Alito and Kavanaugh decisions and you chose to drop the subject.

I didn't drop the subject, YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND THE SUBJECT.

Penis Head and Beer Keg are 2 of the 6 Nazi justices on the court.

All it takes for SCOTUS to hear a case is the consent of 4 judges.

Subtract Penis Head and Beer Keg from the 6 Nazi judges and how many Nazi judges do you have left?

Come on, Mr. Math...what is 6 minus 2?
 
Supreme Court justices have already said those are safe

They also said Roe was safe in their confirmation hearings, so why do you believe them when they've already lied to your face?

I think it's because you're a fucking idiot, but I'm open to hearing other explanations.
 
You just admitted in an earlier post that you were completely fucking wrong with your assessment of where things were headed in 2016.

WE TOLD YOU IN 2016 THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN, and your response was to act like a fucking asshole and insist that everyone was overreacting and only YOU had a calm, collected, and rational mindset.

Turns out your mindset was arrogant gullibility.

You're not as perceptive, instinctual, intelligent, or savvy as you want everyone to think. You got played because you enjoy the smell of your own farts too much.


Being right about one issue should not change my mind about being rational and going by past history and not believing all the hysterical idiots predicting catastrophe at every news event.

What will happen in November? Will Democrats gain or lose seats in Congress?
 
That carries a lot more weight than "those Republicans" that cannot do anything without a lot of support.

Only two of them said that, both of whom also lied about the Roe precedent in their confirmation hearings.

So why do you believe them when they say this? Is it because you're a fucking idiot, or is it because you're a sucker, or is it because you're a liar?
 
Your statements about Kavanaugh and Alito were contradicted before you even made those claims.

The only thing that has come from this thread has been the fact that your instincts are shit.

I don't want to hear anything from someone who was so arrogantly dismissive of warnings from 6 years ago, unless that something is an apology.

So where's your apology for being a fucking idiot, Flash?

We knew this was going to happen in 2016, yet you did not.

So why do you think your judgment today on the validity of what Nazis on the court say holds any water when you were completely fucking wrong about it in 2016?
 
They also said Roe was safe in their confirmation hearings, so why do you believe them when they've already lied to your face?

I think it's because you're a fucking idiot, but I'm open to hearing other explanations.

Are you now admitting they said those rights are safe? You just told us they did not say that.

We both know judicial appointees never give their opinion about hypothetical cases during their confirmation hearings. If you read Dobbs you will see that they gave a lot of support to precedent.

Obergefell overturned a 1972 case. Did those justices lie about supporting precedent and did you yell and scream about overturning precedent?


 
Being right about one issue should not change my mind about being rational and going by past history and not believing all the hysterical idiots predicting catastrophe at every news event.

What will happen in November? Will Democrats gain or lose seats in Congress?

You are the only rational person on the forum!
 
You wrote stuff you knew was wrong or, more likely, knew nothing at all. You disagreed with me not because you read the cases, but because it didn't fit your partisan straight jacket.

LMAO!

Flash seems to forget that all it takes for SCOTUS to hear a case is the consent of 4 justices...he makes a big deal out of Kavanaugh and Alito, but seems to forget that they are just 2 of 6 Nazi judges, and the other four will simply choose to hear cases that further erode our rights because that's what they're setting out to do.

Also, as we've seen, Roberts Court isn't bound to anything they have said before.

So Flash, when I tell you today that SCOTUS' goal is to erode all those decisions and more, just like we told you in 2016 that you arrogantly dismissed, why are you pretending it isn't?
 
Back
Top