Hey remember when Flash said the GOP wouldn't go after gay marriage or birth control?

[LV426]

Your prediction for November?

LMAO! Nice try, but I'm not making any sort of prediction for a couple reasons:

1) I genuinely have no idea what's going to happen.

2) I don't believe you will be honest when you recount my prediction, just like how you fucked up the prediction I made that Trump would try to cancel the election; not that he would be successful, just that he would try.

You've been lying about that for a while now, so it's time for those chickens to come home to roost.

 

[Flash]

Again, you're lying about what I said because you're a habitual liar.

I said Trump would try to cancel the election, and he did try to cancel it...several times in several different ways.

You took "Trump will try to cancel the election" to "Trump will cancel the election", dropping the "try to" because you were desperate for a gotcha because I made you feel dumb and small, and straw men are all you are capable of doing because you have no critical thinking skills.

You're a fucking liar and a fraud, and everyone knows it.

Now do you remember saying this?

"I still don't think we are going to have elections in November."

"Step 1: Delay or cancel primaries (already happened)
Step 2: Oppose mail-in balloting by destroying the post office (already happening)
Step 3: Cancel the general election out of concerns for "safety"; concerns that could have been addressed, if not for Step #2."

VP Harris just said she did not think Roe would be overturned. I guess that makes her an idiot.

 

[Flash]

LMAO! Nice try, but I'm not making any sort of prediction for a couple reasons:

1) I genuinely have no idea what's going to happen.

2) I don't believe you will be honest when you recount my prediction, just like how you fucked up the prediction I made that Trump would try to cancel the election; not that he would be successful, just that he would try.

You've been lying about that for a while now, so it's time for those chickens to come home to roost.

You did not say "try."

"I still don't think we are going to have elections in November."

 

[LV426]

Nope.

Yep. I said "try to".

All of it in the context of "try to".

You are dishonorable person because you constantly ignore or dismiss very important context.

You don't have a gotcha here, Flash...what you have is a catastrophic misreading of a post that you are clinging to at this point to try and undermine my credibility after SCOTUS totally undermined yours.

It's a fuckin' temper tantrum because this persona you have spent so much time cultivating on JPP was turned on its head by this ruling...that should prompt you to reevaluate yourself and how you could have been taken for a ride so easily.

 

[LV426]

LV426: "I still don't think we are going to have elections in November."

OK, which comes from where? From this: "Trump will try to cancel the 2020 election".

That was my prediction...and that prediction was correct.

So what else ya got?

 

[LV426]

I just proved you wrong about Alito and Kavanaugh by posting their own words.

Their words mean nothing because they contradicted their sworn testimony.

And it's just those two...which means the other four Nazis could very well collude to bring a challenge to the court along the lines Alito swears (well he didn't swear or promise or guarantee) won't get crossed.

SCOTUS has a legitimacy problem now that you are helping to fuel by clinging to the written words of 2 of the 6 Nazi judges.

 

[LV426]

I just proved you wrong when you said you did not say the 2020 election was going to be cancelled by posting your own words

I said Trump would try and my personal belief was that he would succeed...and he very nearly did.

That's way different than you arrogantly insisting Roe was safe in 2016, much like how you're insisting Lawrence, Griswold, and Obergefell are safe in 2022.

I won't even include all the past stuff you got wrong.

Like what? Nothing.

You were wrong about the tax cut, while I predicted it would plunge us into recession which it did.

I also predicted it would depress revenues, which it did.

I also predicted that it wouldn't create a single job, which it didn't.

I also predicted that it would lead to less business investment, which it did.

 

[Flash]

Their words mean nothing because they contradicted their sworn testimony.

And it's just those two...which means the other four Nazis could very well collude to bring a challenge to the court along the lines Alito swears (well he didn't swear or promise or guarantee) won't get crossed.

SCOTUS has a legitimacy problem now that you are helping to fuel by clinging to the written words of 2 of the 6 Nazi judges.

Trying to divert from the discussion. You claimed they did not say that and I proved they did.

I don't care or know whether they were telling the truth or not. You were wrong about what they wrote because you were too lazy to read the cases.

 

[LV426]

Surely you don't believe what people say at confirmation hearings when both sides are trying to trick the other into saying something at can be used against them.

So your position is that we shouldn't expect anyone to be honest when they testify under oath because a bunch of Republicans weren't?

 

[LV426]

Were you all screaming and hollering when Obergefell overturned precedent like you are about Roe?

No because none of the justices lied about it, and it didn't take rights away from anyone; it bestowed rights to people.

 

[LV426]

It doesn't matter if the nominees were asked about the opinion since they never commit themselves about controversial topics.

You should say it doesn't matter to your argument if the nominees were asked about the opinion because we are talking about lying under oath, not overturning precedent.

You understand the difference, right?

 

[LV426]

1. about cancelling the 2020 election

It was very nearly cancelled, Flash! What do you think 1/6 was all about?

2. claiming you did not say the election would be cancelled

I said Trump would try, and my personal belief was that he would succeed.

I was expecting more than stuff we've already rehashed as you misrepresenting what I said from the start.

I said, from the start, that Trump would try to cancel the 2020 election...you dropped the "try to" from your original attack, and then you tried to decontextualize another of my quotes which came after my initial prediction.

You use sophistry because you lost the argument.

So, I was expecting to see more than one example of being alarmist that you didn't already mention, that I didn't already smack down.

I know something you were wrong about...the tax cut...or really, tax cuts in general.

 

[LV426]

You did not say "try."

I did in my original post that for some reason you stopped linking to.

You want me to dig up that original post? Because I already did that once and you ran away from it like the fucking coward you are.

What you've done now is try to seize on something I wrote AFTER I made that initial prediction and you're arguing semantics to try and undermine my credibility after SCOTUS laughably undermined yours.

What you're doing is just more BoTHSIDeS...you aren't content to apologize for being wrong, instead you try to tear me down to your level because you need to prove to yourself that you're not worse than the person who pointed out how fucking DUMB and NAIVE you are.

 

[LV426]

Trying to divert from the discussion. You claimed they did not say that and I proved they did.

They lied in their testimony which means you can't trust anything they say.

Why are you so adamant the institution has credibility when everyone and everything is pointing to it being illegitimate?

You claimed they did not say that and I proved they did.

Hold on a second...I never said they didn't say it...I said they didn't MEAN it.

Is this another instance of Flash misreading posts and trying to construct straw men? Yep.

 

[LV426]

I don't care or know whether they were telling the truth or not.

You don't care if a SCOTUS justice is being truthful?

Do you hold yourself to that same, pathetically low standard? If so, that definitely changes things between us, and not in a good way...

It kind of reinforces my thought that you're a phony baloney nobody who lies so much that you don't even know what it means to be truthful.

 

[Into the Night]

I am not surprised in the least that after curtailing reproductive choice, Republicans would seek to overturn marriage equality.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! 'Marriage Equality'???????!? GFM? Another one for your buzzword list!

 

[Into the Night]

How extreme can they go?

Can SCOTUS basically turn this nation into a theocracy?

Pay attention, voters. Is this the direction you're looking to go in?

SCOTUS does not have authority to form a theocracy. See the 1st amendment.

 

[Into the Night]

What's marriage equality?

A buzzword. Meaningless.

I assume it has something to do with so-called 'gay marriage' (which is not possible).

 

[Matt Dillon]

Clarence Thomas is the lynching that SHOULD have happened.

^How much more racist could a motherfucker get?

 

[Into the Night]

It was very nearly cancelled, Flash! What do you think 1/6 was all about?

Protests because the election faulted.

I said Trump would try, and my personal belief was that he would succeed.

Try what? Succeed at what?

I was expecting more than stuff we've already rehashed as you misrepresenting what I said from the start.

I said, from the start, that Trump would try to cancel the 2020 election...

Trump is not a Democrat. DEMOCRATS caused the election to fault. Sorry dude, you can't blame YOUR problem on Trump.