evince
Truthmatters
Putin would use him like a two-dollar whore.
He's probably having wet dreams about Donald Trump. :0)
oh he would wait until putin did trump and the bend it over for a double teaming from both
Putin would use him like a two-dollar whore.
He's probably having wet dreams about Donald Trump. :0)
It's her own State Dept memo..is that SPAM?? you can cheer all you want to for Clinton -i'll deal in facts.
No "Libya hasn't been investigated to death" -that's Bengazi. Bengazi is but a symptom of the Libyan war 2011
god almighty..
Do you not understand the "Pottery Barn rule?" - you break it you own it. It applies to both Iraq and Libya.
I posted her OWN STATE DEPT's memo to show you her expansive role....she was chief US advocate
( Gates called her the 51st % voie in the WH NSC)and international organizer.
Go vote for a war criminal..i'll have none of it.
WTF happened to Democrats after Iraq?? are they all brain dead partisans??
hopeless. you are fixated on Bengazi.."cherry picked spam" it's her own State Dept memo?If you were dealing with facts you would not vote for Trump over Clinton claiming he has better foreign policy credentials. Now get your head out of Benghazi, and look at the rest of the world Clinton dealt with for eight years, and Trump did not. You posted cherry picked spam. I have already read the 800-plus page report,that took two years to make. The report had no new significant details about the attacks and it offered no clear and direct evidence that laid the blame for the attacks on Hillary Clinton.
hopeless. you are fixated on Bengazi.."cherry picked spam" it's her own State Dept memo?
do you need more? how about the NYTimes? educate yourself.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html?_r=1
Hillary Clinton,
‘Smart Power’
and a
Dictator’s Fall
The president was wary. The
secretary of state was persuasive.
But the ouster of Col. Muammar
el-Qaddafi left Libya a failed
state and a terrorist haven.
did you hold Bush accountable for the destruction of Iraq? creating ISIS? I do.Okay now you are talking like a partisan idiot, I have no dealings with that foolishness.
the adults are having a conversation. go play with your toys. thanks.Damn you are simple
how do you figureTalking to Putin ( which is all he's said) is better then not talking and continuing the Cold War 2.0?Putin would use him like a two-dollar whore.
He's probably having wet dreams about Donald Trump. :0)
1) did you hold Bush accountable for the destruction of Iraq? creating ISIS? I do.
2) Why not hold Clinton responsible for Libya? -i've given you 2 main sources -not "spam"
3) do you even know that ISIS moved into Libya, just like it did Iraq from Syria??
4) and I'm partisan?? How in the FUCK can you give a pass to Clinton when you blame Bush for the very same thing.
deaths of 10,000s,and ruination of a country. Iraq=Libya in that sense.
But Bernie pegged her. Her excoriated her on Big Donors, and her shitty judgement.Start from here .. NO OTHER CANDIDATE LIKE TRUMP WOULD HAVE EVER BEEN SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED.
Where you factor into my thoughts on far too many white men is, like them, you fail to recognize the OBVIOUS dangers of handing the keys to the kingdom to a temperamental rich guy with no experience in doing anything but making money. How you came to such a decision doesn't even matter. Regardless of who Clinton is or isn't, she has the demonstrated experience, intelligence, temperament, and gravitas to be president. Trump has none of that .. he just has you and his legion of frightened and desperate white men.
You are indeed free to support whomever you choose to .. but you supporting him doesn't make him or that support any less ridiculous .. and telling.
Bernie is voting for Clinton, not Trump.
*ick*she's a warmongering, corrupt, imperious, grifter with a horrible record from her launching post as Sec of State.she has the demonstrated experience, intelligence, temperament, and gravitas to be president.
right. Russian reset. that was a screw up.. why don't you show some Clinton accomplishments in her field as sec of state? * there aren't any*If you were dealing with facts you would not vote for Trump over Clinton claiming he has better foreign policy credentials. Now get your head out of Benghazi, and look at the rest of the world Clinton dealt with for eight years, and Trump did not. You posted cherry picked spam. I have already read the 800-plus page report,that took two years to make. The report had no new significant details about the attacks and it offered no clear and direct evidence that laid the blame for the attacks on Hillary Clinton.
right. Russian reset. that was a screw up.. why don't you show some Clinton accomplishments in her field as sec of state? * there aren't any*
he hasn't been a politician you moron. He didn't destroy Libya either. ( not Bengazi for the umpteenth time)I already have shown Clinton successes in Asia, no need to be redundant. Show me Trump's - oh you cant because he has no foreign policy experience.
he hasn't been a politician you moron. He didn't destroy Libya either. ( not Bengazi for the umpteenth time)
You rap off some "Mallaca Strait" as success.. was that part of the Asian Pivot?
John Dillinger had experience in banking..would you make him head of the Treasury dept? Clinton's "experience" is war and death.So Trump has no experience in foreign policy, and Clinton does. Benghazi is the second largest city in Libya , that is where this entire Bagger charade started Duncski.
Sorry I do not reply to total Bullshit.TOTAL AND COMPLETE SPAM ..
John Dillinger had experience in banking..would you make him head of the Treasury dept? Clinton's "experience" is war and death.
what about that pivot?
congrats on finding Bengazi..but this is not about Bengazi. It's the Libyan war.
It's to show you how inane your "Clinton has experience" argument is.What a stupid analogy, Dillinger had experience in armed robbery not Banking. Come back with something that resembles an argument.