Homosexuality is not a sin

gfm7175 said:
Yup, you got it. Nordy wasn't quite hitting the mark.

Marriage is a union between a man and a woman in which both of them are joined together as a single body. This specific union is formed and officially recognized via a contract between the man, the woman, and some sort of authority.

Indeed, marriage is about providing an environment (a solid foundation) to have and raise children. From a Christian perspective, it is also an earthly mirroring of the heavenly marriage between Jesus Christ and The Church, in which those two separate bodies will likewise be joined together into one single body at the marriage feast.

And yes, "gay marriage" is indeed just a mockery/bastardization of marriage. Satan sure loves to take that sort of approach with regard to the good things that God has instituted. In fact, Satan has even taken such an approach with regard to the Holy Trinity itself (Father, Son, Holy Spirit ---> Dragon, Beast, False Prophet).
Click to expand...

He's lately been trying to argue that because not everyone gets married and decides to have kids, the institution of marriage should be discarded. He is attempting to discard marriage by redefining it. A common tactic used by these people.

This kind of redefinition to void is common not just here, but in many aspects of the liberal mindset...even to the point that it's become a different language.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Paranoid Schizophrenia https://www.psycom.net/paranoid-schizophrenia

Paranoid schizophrenia is characterized by predominantly positive symptoms of schizophrenia, including delusions and hallucinations. These debilitating symptoms blur the line between what is real and what isn’t, making it difficult for the person to lead a typical life.

Schizophrenia occurs in about 1.1 percent of the population, while paranoid schizophrenia is considered the most common subtype of this chronic disorder.1 The average age of onset is late adolescence to early adulthood, usually between the ages of 18 to 30. It is highly unusual for schizophrenia to be diagnosed after age 45 or before age 16. Onset in males typically occurs earlier in life than females.2
Click to expand...

Looking up your own problem?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I am speaking to you directly, Sybil. When you quit lying to me, then I'll use whatever username you settle upon.
Click to expand...
No, you are speaking to gfm7175. You are not speaking to Sybil. Sybil seems to only exist within your own mind (I am unaware of any Sybil on the JPP forum).
 
Into the Night said:
Not homosexuality. You are being an idiot by trying to compare this to homosexuality.
Click to expand...
I see that AProudLefty is still up to his same tired antics.

[1] In principle, reproduction is possible via heterosexuality.
[2] In principle, reproduction is impossible via homosexuality.

AProudLefty then loves to play games instead of addressing what someone is actually saying.

"but... but some people are infertile..." (doesn't refute statement #1)
"homosexuals can reproduce" (doesn't refute statement #2)

He purposefully bounces all over the place, refusing to focus on the point at hand. "Let me pick out an abnormality and equate that to a normality". "Let me refer to a 'homosexual person' and equate that to the behavior of homosexuality".
 
Last edited:
gfm7175 said:
I see that AProudLefty is still up to his same tired antics.

[1] In principle, reproduction is possible via heterosexuality.
[2] In principle, reproduction is impossible via homosexuality.

AProudLefty then loves to play games instead of addressing what someone is actually saying.

"but... but some people are infertile..." (doesn't refute statement #1)
"homosexuals can reproduce" (doesn't refute statement #2)

He purposefully goes all over the place, refusing to focus on the point at hand.
Click to expand...

That's not what he's posted, Sybil.

Let me try to dumb it down so even a paranoid psycho like you and your "friends" can understand: A homosexual male can provide sperm to a lesbian woman to have a baby. Ergo, homosexuals can reproduce.

txio0fn.gif
 
gfm7175 said:
You are the one who needs help. It appears as if you were searching for some information about your condition a bit earlier, which is a good start.
Click to expand...

Maybe. See how easy that is for a normal, well balanced person versus a liar or mentally ill one?

I think you are a paranoid schizophrenic, Sybil. What do you think I am? What do you believe my mental condition to be?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's not what he's posted,
Click to expand...
That's PRECISELY what he's posted in this thread, Dutch boy. I've been conversing with him directly. I sure as hell remember what he has said.

You can look up his post #821 in this thread, for a single example, to see that he has in fact brought up the "infertility" angle. He has also made many posts in this thread about "homosexual men" being able to reproduce.

Dutch Uncle said:
Sybil.
Click to expand...
I am not Sybil nor can I converse with her. She is YOUR hallucination.

Dutch Uncle said:
Let me try to dumb it down so even a paranoid psycho like you and your "friends" can understand:
Click to expand...
Translation: Let me make the exact same claim that Lefty has already made, which has already been addressed.

Dutch Uncle said:
A homosexual male
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as a homosexual male (see my Lispy Leftist List of Linguistic Lunacy in my sig). What you are referring to is a man who is practicing homosexuality. Homosexuality is a behavior, not a person.

Dutch Uncle said:
can provide sperm
Click to expand...
Correct. A man can indeed provide sperm, regardless of whether or not he is practicing homosexuality.

Dutch Uncle said:
to a lesbian woman
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as a lesbian woman (see my Lispy Leftist List of Linguistic Lunacy in my sig). What you are referring to is a woman who is practicing homosexuality. Homosexuality is a behavior, not a person.

Dutch Uncle said:
to have a baby.
Click to expand...
You have now pivoted away from homosexuality. You are now speaking about heterosexuality. FOCUS!

Dutch Uncle said:
Ergo, homosexuals can reproduce.
Click to expand...
Not via homosexuality, which is what is being discussed.

In principle, a man and a man (homosexuality) cannot reproduce.
In principle, a woman and a woman (homosexuality) cannot reproduce.
In principle, a man and a woman (heterosexuality) can reproduce.
 
gfm7175 said:
That's PRECISELY what he's posted in this thread, Dutch boy. I've been conversing with him directly. I sure as hell remember what he has said.

You can look up his post #821 in this thread, for a single example, to see that he has in fact brought up the "infertility" angle. He has also made many posts in this thread about "homosexual men" being able to reproduce.


I am not Sybil nor can I converse with her. She is YOUR hallucination.


Translation: Let me make the exact same claim that Lefty has already made, which has already been addressed.


There is no such thing as a homosexual male (see my Lispy Leftist List of Linguistic Lunacy in my sig). What you are referring to is a man who is practicing homosexuality. Homosexuality is a behavior, not a person.


Correct. A man can indeed provide sperm, regardless of whether or not he is practicing homosexuality.


There is no such thing as a lesbian woman (see my Lispy Leftist List of Linguistic Lunacy in my sig). What you are referring to is a woman who is practicing homosexuality. Homosexuality is a behavior, not a person.


You have now pivoted away from homosexuality. You are now speaking about heterosexuality. FOCUS!


Not via homosexuality, which is what is being discussed.

In principle, a man and a man (homosexuality) cannot reproduce.
In principle, a woman and a woman (homosexuality) cannot reproduce.
In principle, a man and a woman (heterosexuality) can reproduce.
Click to expand...

Hi Sybil!

You have a very distinctive posting style. :)

You parse posts, obsess over it and spend a lot of time repeating the same thing.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Hi Sybil!
Click to expand...
I am still not Sybil. I am still gfm7175.

Dutch Uncle said:
You have a very distinctive posting style. :)
Click to expand...
I divide separate claims and address each of them separately. I see you had nothing to say in response to the arguments that I made. I think I know why that is...

Dutch Uncle said:
You parse posts, obsess over it and spend a lot of time repeating the same thing.
Click to expand...
Stop making the same arguments over and over again and I will then stop making the same responses to you over and over again.

You are complaining about something that you are directly causing.
 
gfm7175 said:
I am still not Sybil. I am still gfm7175.


I divide separate claims and address each of them separately. I see you had nothing to say in response to the arguments that I made. I think I know why that is...


Stop making the same arguments over and over again and I will then stop making the same responses to you over and over again.

You are complaining about something that you are directly causing.
Click to expand...

I'm calling your style of posting "Sybilism". LOL

Stop posting to me or stop lying to me. Your choice, Sybil.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
QED, Sybil. See? You have a pattern of behavior which stays with you even when you switch socks.

The curious part for me is "Do you know they are socks or do you really believe they are different people?"
Click to expand...
You do realize that different people can make use of the same words from time to time, right?

IBD: 2+2=4
ITN: 2+2=4
GFM: 2+2=4

Dutch boy: I SEE SOCK PEOPLE!!!!! SOCKS EVERYWHERE!!!!!! OH NO!!!!!!!


IBD: You are violating the Stefan Boltzmann Law.
ITN: You are violating the Stefan Boltzmann Law.
GFM: You are violating the Stefan Boltzmann Law.

Dutch boy: I SEE SOCK PEOPLE!!!!! SOCKS EVERYWHERE!!!!!! OH NO!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top