Homosexuality is not a sin

gfm7175 said:
You do realize that different people can make use of the same words from time to time, right?

IBD: 2+2=4
ITN: 2+2=4
GFM: 2+2=4

Dutch boy: I SEE SOCK PEOPLE!!!!! SOCKS EVERYWHERE!!!!!! OH NO!!!!!!!


IBD: You are violating the Stefan Boltzmann Law.
ITN: You are violating the Stefan Boltzmann Law.
GFM: You are violating the Stefan Boltzmann Law.

Dutch boy: I SEE SOCK PEOPLE!!!!! SOCKS EVERYWHERE!!!!!! OH NO!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Nice try, Sybil. No doubt you really do see the world in simple terms.
gfm7175 said:
I'm calling your style of posting "Dutchism". LOL

You cannot bully me around, Dutch boy. I will respond to whatever posts of yours I wish to respond to whenever I feel like responding to them. You have no control over me.
Click to expand...
Awesome, Sybil. You should do that.
 
gfm7175 said:
No, you are speaking to gfm7175. You are not speaking to Sybil. Sybil seems to only exist within your own mind (I am unaware of any Sybil on the JPP forum).
Click to expand...

I searched for such a user here, no record of it. Nah. What you are seeing here is someone hallucinating.

Lots of kids have imaginary friends, but as they age, the discard them for real friends. I guess Uncle never learned how to do that, so he retains this imaginary friend(?) that he tries to insult. He's an odd bird. Insulting is all he does, and even has to resort to insulting imaginary beings to satisfy some inner craving. Then, of course, there is his belief that everyone is a sock.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's not what he's posted, Sybil.

Let me try to dumb it down so even a paranoid psycho like you and your "friends" can understand: A homosexual male can provide sperm to a lesbian woman to have a baby. Ergo, homosexuals can reproduce.

txio0fn.gif
Click to expand...

Sybil isn't here. It is what Lefty posted.
 
Into the Night said:
I searched for such a user here, no record of it. Nah. What you are seeing here is someone hallucinating.

Lots of kids have imaginary friends, but as they age, the discard them for real friends. I guess Uncle never learned how to do that, so he retains this imaginary friend(?) that he tries to insult. He's an odd bird. Insulting is all he does, and even has to resort to insulting imaginary beings to satisfy some inner craving. Then, of course, there is his belief that everyone is a sock.
Click to expand...

You are not fooling anyone, except perhaps yourself.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Maybe. See how easy that is for a normal, well balanced person versus a liar or mentally ill one?

I think you are a paranoid schizophrenic, Sybil. What do you think I am? What do you believe my mental condition to be?
Click to expand...

You described it yourself. A paranoid schizophrenic, desperately trying to seek attention.
 
Nordberg said:
Obergfell V Hodges decided it once and for all. Same sex marriage is marriage and has all the power and responsibilities of hetero marriages. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556 That is what defines marriage, not some dumb right kid GFM and his alternative personalities. It is the law. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556
Click to expand...

No, it doesn't. Same sex 'marriages' are a mockery of marriage. They do not have the power to procreate. They do not have any of the responsibilities of children they brought into the world.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
QED, Sybil. See? You have a pattern of behavior which stays with you even when you switch socks.

The curious part for me is "Do you know they are socks or do you really believe they are different people?"
Click to expand...

Attempted proof by false equivalence.
His use of my acronym is correct. You are repetitively asking a question that has already been answered. That's what RQAA means. This has also already been explained to you.
 
gfm7175 said:
I'm calling your style of posting "Dutchism". LOL


You cannot bully me around, Dutch boy. I will respond to whatever posts of yours I wish to respond to whenever I feel like responding to them. You have no control over me.
Click to expand...

Same here. I happen to be a bit bored today, so I'm responding to him at the moment.
 
Into the Night said:
You described it yourself. A paranoid schizophrenic, desperately trying to seek attention.
Click to expand...

That's not what I wrote, Sybil. It's okay if you're too stupid to formulate answer.

Obviously you're very good with your stock phrases and cut'n'paste posts, but you're not very good thinking on your feet and that's piques my curiosity.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's not what I wrote, Sybil. It's okay if you're too stupid to formulate answer.

Obviously you're very good with your stock phrases and cut'n'paste posts, but you're not very good thinking on your feet and that's piques my curiosity.
Click to expand...

Sybil isn't here. It is what you wrote. Denial of self argument.
 
Into the Night said:
Attempted proof by false equivalence.
His use of my acronym is correct. You are repetitively asking a question that has already been answered. That's what RQAA means. This has also already been explained to you.
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
Inversion fallacy.
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
Sybil isn't here. It is what you wrote. Denial of self argument.
Click to expand...

Stock phrases and cut'n'paste, Sybil. Those are your strengths. Care to know what your weaknesses are?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top