Alcoholism hurts.
If that is true, in all cases, then it is harmful.
Alcoholism hurts.
Nope, I am right. Have you ever read The Bible?? Maybe page through Leviticus sometime... or Matthew... or Romans... all sorts of passages about how homosexuality is a sin and how God detests it.Wrong.
google lazy fuck, and democrats wonder why the right calls them lazy fucks
Generally the one making the claim is the lazy fuck if he refuses to back it up.
Both things are detestable per The Bible.see. now they've got you arguing about gay.
pedophilia is not about gay.
quit falling for it.
you may have to cut bait on your homo stand to save the kids.
If that is true, in all cases, then it is harmful.
Nope, I am right. Have you ever read The Bible?? Maybe page through Leviticus sometime... or Matthew... or Romans... all sorts of passages about how homosexuality is a sin and how God detests it.
Alcoholism is a disorder. Normal drinking is not.
Both things are detestable per The Bible.
How do you define it as a disorder? What about it makes it a disorder? What defines alcoholism?
It's when you cannot stop and your life is messed up.
Ok... most alcoholics Ive known claim that can stop if they wanted to.
google can be your friend, early studies date back to the early 2000s on the first search. Serotonin studies are mentioned, tags on genes themselves, genetic and biological topics on the matter.
How do you define it as a disorder? What about it makes it a disorder? What defines alcoholism?
Not trying to be dumb here, I really do not know.
It doesn't work that way. When you make the claim and it's challenged, it's up to you to provide evidence for your claim. It's not the job of the challenger to do your homework.
no, it absolutely works that way here because it has to, every time someone backs up a claim with data, you (especially you) and others attack the source. So the time spent was wasted. So it is on you to do your homework. You have been provided a source, get off your lazy fucking ass and look it up or shut the fuck up with your stupid nonsense. Have a great weekend!
It is your interpretation. Leviticus is for Jews. The laws are health codes. The NT is talking about Roman pagan worship. Jesus never said anything about homosexuality. Please study the Bible more.
- Jesus did not do away with the law Early on in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus Christ said, “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill” (Matthew 5:17).
Nope...
1) Do you have a citation? And 2) even if it were a different balance of chemicals... is that not created by God?
The Law is for the Jews. Sorry buddy.