Homosexuality is not a sin

[Dutch Uncle]

Why are you sending this question to me? I can't talk to your hallucination.

I am not Sybil, nor can I communicate with your imaginary friend in any way.

At least you're trying.

Better than this:

Sybil isn't here.

Sybil isn't here.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Ole' Dutch boy doesn't appreciate anything or anyone but himself.

Wrong, Sybil. I care about you and your mental issues.

 

[Nordberg]

Marriage is a contract between a man, a woman, and an authority (which could be government, or marriage by law; or the commander of a vessel, or marriage by maritime law (yeah, even works for aircraft); or which could be God, or marriage under the authority of the kingdom of God). In many States they also recognize what is known as 'common law' marriage, or marriage by claim.

Marriage is about providing an environment to have and raise children.

To have a 'gay marriage' is not a marriage at all, just a mockery of it.

When you get married, you will have to buy a license. That is a legal and binding contract. If you think otherwise, when you get divorced the power of the state in marriage will be shown clearly to you. Gays buy the same license and are under the same powers. The law says it is a marriage. You say, for some stupid reason, that it is not. I think the law determines that not your atavistic beliefs.

 

[danielpalos]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[Into the Night]

That has nothing to do with my post. Try to see through your drug induced fog and stay on subject.

Asking danelpalos to stay on subject is almost as pointless as asking lefty to stay on subject. Good luck with that!

 

[Into the Night]

Your response has nothing to do with my rebuttal. Try to focus.

Your problem, dude. Not his. Inversion fallacy.

 

[danielpalos]

Your problem, dude. Not his. Inversion fallacy.

I can't be the problem if I resort to the fewest fallacies. That is why you need valid rebuttals not any diversion. I prefer women for fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

I only notice right-wingers don't care about capitalism or the law and are willing to manufacture fantasy to try to prove their points.

We don't have a welfare-State in the US and never had one.

You are describing Democrats. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Wrong, Sybil. I care about you and your mental issues.

Sybil has mental issues? Why are you trying to talk to this imaginary being then?

 

[Into the Night]

When you get married, you will have to buy a license.

Not necessarily true.

That is a legal and binding contract.

Apparently not, since so many people are getting divorced these days.

If you think otherwise, when you get divorced the power of the state in marriage will be shown clearly to you.

A void statement.

Gays buy the same license and are under the same powers.

So?

The law says it is a marriage.

It is not. It is a mockery of a marriage, despite what the government calls it.

You say, for some stupid reason, that it is not.

So having and raising kids is a stupid reason????!?

I think the law determines that not your atavistic beliefs.

What beliefs?????!?? I am not stating any belief!

 

[Into the Night]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Back to your mindless chanting, I see.

 

[danielpalos]

You are describing Democrats. Inversion fallacy.

You need valid arguments, troll.

 

[danielpalos]

Back to your mindless chanting, I see.

It is why I don't take right-wingers seriously about being Legal to any Laws. Not even in border threads.

Job 34:30 That the hypocrite reign not, lest the people be ensnared.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Only right-wingers don't seem to understand our own supreme law of the land. Why "blame the Poor" like immoral hypocrites, right-wingers?

Vote Blue not Red!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Sybil has mental issues? Why are you trying to talk to this imaginary being then?

Why, yes, she does, Sybil. Sybil is a real person. Why do you believe she isn't?

 

[AProudLefty]

"Squawk Squawk Squawk!!!"

Squawk all you want; you're still wrong.

Men can reproduce with women. Learn biology.

 

[BartenderElite]

Once again: the ability to procreate has NOTHING to do w/ this discussion.

Many couples do not procreate. Many single people do not procreate. It is not a justification for anything.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Once again: the ability to procreate has NOTHING to do w/ this discussion.

Many couples do not procreate. Many single people do not procreate. It is not a justification for anything.

Once again, the chronology of the posts shows how and why this came into the discussion. Your last sentence is a moot point to try and detract from a fact of life and why it's such a point of consternation to the LGBQT social agenda. To date, my point stands valid and cannot be talked around.

 

[danielpalos]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

You should ask your Special Ed teacher for help to rephrase your common lament so American adults can understand what the fuck you are trying to say.

 

[danielpalos]

You should ask your Special Ed teacher for help to rephrase your common lament so American adults can understand what the fuck you are trying to say.

Ignorance of the law is not any form of excuse.