Homosexuality

PostmodernProphet said:
so that makes seven by court order, two by popular vote and the rest by legislative action without asking the voters?......
Click to expand...

three by popular vote... and, as in the case of Maine, voters in states whose legislature passes gay marriage can always overturn the legislation or, at the very least, toss out the legislators who voted for it. Maine overturned gay marriage enacted by the legislature in 2008... and then, in 2012, the voters passed it at the polls. the tide IS turning.
 
christiefan915 said:
Bingo. Doesn't take long to figure him out, does it. I'd like to know on what planet his crap passes for debate.

A few days ago I went through some of his posts and struck out everything that wasn't an insult, and there were about three unrelated words remaining in each reply. It was fun and enlightening. Here's an example.

"No matter how many times you post the same stupid shit, it doesn't make your or this Democrat jurists case look less dumb.

The only one whining like a little bitch is you having your dimwitted talking points shoved back into your dullard hyper partisan and empty head.

I'm amused that it took you until now to raise the predictable racist canard; you dunces just can't help yourselves can you?"
Click to expand...

Yeah, noticed that as well. Just like Yurt, always attacks the poster lots of insults, no debate no substance.
 
Whatever the polls say, legal gay marriage is just. Keeping it illegal is unjust. The public is seeing it more and more.

And to all you who claim not to be homophobes, while opposing gay marriages and framing it as queer marriage, while claiming to have gay friends....

Guess what? Gay marriage will win, funeral by funeral.
 
I'm not sure what the point of the original post was in this thread...

If it was to show "homosexuality" in animals other than humans in order to somehow argue that it should thus be viewed as "okay" by everyone, there is also murder among animals other than humans, even cannibalism.... In fact, the black widow has been known to poison and kill her own mate. Is the argument that humans are to make decisions based on how the rest of the animal kingdom behaves at any given time? Because that could become quite an interesting discussion...

If it was to somehow mock those who believe that God created those animals that are acting in a perceptibly "homosexual" way, I think even that attempt falls flat on its face, since the ones who generally believe God created those animals also consistently believe that God created humans in His image- which is to say that they believe humans are special and were not only created to have dominion over other animals but to have higher conscience capabilities that other animals weren't made to have, making moral decisions that the other animals were not created to make. Many of these same people also believe that when God cursed the ground after "The Fall" ("Cursed is the ground because of you..." Gen.3-17), everything on earth that had been protected from death and decay had those protections removed because of this curse- which is to say that any number of actions animals make which would be questioned by a society of humans, may have begun after (and because of) this curse.

Interestingly, in Isaiah 65:25 it says: "The wolf and the lamb will feed together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox, and dust will be the serpent's food. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain," says the LORD." ...It could be argued that this verse demonstrates (to some degree) how God would have wanted His creation to live had it not been for "The Fall" of man, and that if He was to have a holy area on earth, this is how harmonious things would have been among the animal kingdom...
 
blacknwhite321 said:
I'm not sure what the point of the original post was in this thread...

If it was to show "homosexuality" in animals other than humans in order to somehow argue that it should thus be viewed as "okay" by everyone, there is also murder among animals other than humans, even cannibalism.... In fact, the black widow has been known to poison and kill her own mate. Is the argument that humans are to make decisions based on how the rest of the animal kingdom behaves at any given time? Because that could become quite an interesting discussion...

If it was to somehow mock those who believe that God created those animals that are acting in a perceptibly "homosexual" way, I think even that attempt falls flat on its face, since the ones who generally believe God created those animals also consistently believe that God created humans in His image- which is to say that they believe humans are special and were not only created to have dominion over other animals but to have higher conscience capabilities that other animals weren't made to have, making moral decisions that the other animals were not created to make. Many of these same people also believe that when God cursed the ground after "The Fall" ("Cursed is the ground because of you..." Gen.3-17), everything on earth that had been protected from death and decay had those protections removed because of this curse- which is to say that any number of actions animals make which would be questioned by a society of humans, may have begun after (and because of) this curse.

Interestingly, in Isaiah 65:25 it says: "The wolf and the lamb will feed together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox, and dust will be the serpent's food. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain," says the LORD." ...It could be argued that this verse demonstrates (to some degree) how God would have wanted His creation to live had it not been for "The Fall" of man, and that if He was to have a holy area on earth, this is how harmonious things would have been among the animal kingdom...
Click to expand...
Except for the fact that the creation has been screwed up since long before humans were here. Which means your intelligent designer apparently svrewed a lot of crap up all along the way. Care to explain why 99% of the creatures he created a
Long the way sent extinct? Was he not very bright?
 
Sun Devil said:
One thing about Truth Detector is he calls everyone that doesn't agree with him idiots but cannot formulate a coherent argument.
Click to expand...

Dear shit-for-brains; I only call dunces, dunces, and I did formulate an argument as to why the premise of this thread was fodder for idiots like you, but apparently it was way beyond your IQ and comprehension level.

Now please do the forum a favor and have a heart attack so we do not have to suffer more of your glaring ignorance and effeminate vagina man whining.

Dunce.
 
1966stang said:
Except for the fact that the creation has been screwed up since long before humans were here. Which means your intelligent designer apparently svrewed a lot of crap up all along the way. Care to explain why 99% of the creatures he created a
Long the way sent extinct? Was he not very bright?
Click to expand...
In this thread, no, I'd rather stay on topic. If you want to pose those questions in another thread, I'd prefer to answer them there. :) Just FYI, I don't typically accept premises formed by other people mixed with their stated opinions.
 
christiefan915 said:
Bingo. Doesn't take long to figure him out, does it. I'd like to know on what planet his crap passes for debate.

A few days ago I went through some of his posts and struck out everything that wasn't an insult, and there were about three unrelated words remaining in each reply. It was fun and enlightening. Here's an example.

"No matter how many times you post the same stupid shit, it doesn't make your or this Democrat jurists case look less dumb.

The only one whining like a little bitch is you having your dimwitted talking points shoved back into your dullard hyper partisan and empty head.

I'm amused that it took you until now to raise the predictable racist canard; you dunces just can't help yourselves can you?"
Click to expand...

Based on your strikeouts, not only are you a painfully uninformed dunce, but you don't have the slightest comprehension of what an insult is.

But then, since when do dishonest hyper partisan leftist dunces like you give a shit about the truth, honesty or reality.

You're selective outrage has been noticed. Carry on shit-for-brains.
 
Truth Detector said:
Based on your strikeouts, not only are you a painfully uninformed dunce, but you don't have the slightest comprehension of what an insult is.

But then, since when do dishonest hyper partisan leftist dunces like you give a shit about the truth, honesty or reality.

You're selective outrage has been noticed. Carry on shit-for-brains.
Click to expand...

Q.E.D. my friends, Q.E.D.!
 
It's the union of husband and wife. However, we seem to enjoy make-believe in our legislation. It explains why we still have Daylight Savings on the books...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top