How do you determine who is illegal?

EdwinA said:
It's Too stupid to realize what the 5th is. Nobody honest needs to worry about it.

As for 'profiling', it works, so no reason not to. If you speak no English, have no ID, don't really know where you are, can't answer basic questions, then odds are you need to be detained and fingerprinted.
Click to expand...
Thanks for confirming Pedo Don is both stupid and dishonest, Ms. Edwina. :thup:

www.nbcnews.com

Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices

An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices
An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.
 
We rely on the government for that....those who lie to us constantly....those who have conducted about the most profound betrayal in all of history.

Buckle Up Fuckers....This is going to hurt like a motherfucker.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I don't have any Marxist brethren, dumbfuck. Cry harder.
Click to expand...

Lots of commies pretend to be 'libertarians' on the innernetz; it's their favorite cover for their destructive agenda. They use a lot of ...


"NAMBLA"logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained."


Stirling S. Newberry

... that isn't really 'libertarian' at all, just stupid.
 
EdwinA said:
Lots of commies pretend to be 'libertarians' on the innernetz; it's their favorite cover for their destructive agenda. They use a lot of ...


"NAMBLA"logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained."


Stirling S. Newberry
Click to expand...
Keep trying, Ms. Edwina. Thanks for the 12B violation, dumbass.
 
Jarod said:
You are ignorant of the 12b rule, arent you?
Click to expand...
Why do you think so?

We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Why do you think so?

We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
SO how did the comment you claimed was 12b having a reference to anyone having an "encounter with a child"?
 
Jarod said:
SO how did the comment you claimed was 12b having a reference to anyone having an "encounter with a child"?
Click to expand...
She tied me to NAMBLA. It violates the rule. OTOH, if she makes a sizable enough donation, she can get off with a warning. :thup:

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles about the subject, or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. or in regard to political public figures. (examples, video of Biden with children in the Senate, Trump images with his daughter in his lap, etc. stuff like that. If the political figure is a member of this board, you cannot bring it here though...) We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
She tied me to NAMBLA. It violates the rule.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles about the subject, or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. or in regard to political public figures. (examples, video of Biden with children in the Senate, Trump images with his daughter in his lap, etc. stuff like that. If the political figure is a member of this board, you cannot bring it here though...) We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
Being tied to NAMBLA does not suggest you have had an "encounter with a child."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top