I dont precisely know, do you?
I think it was an organization of people who felt age of consent laws should be abolished.
How do you determine who is illegal?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I think it was an organization of people who felt age of consent laws should be abolished.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
There you go.
How does that suggest anyone had an "encounter with a child"?
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
It's the accusation of pedophilia.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
NAMBLA is a pedophile organization.
Being tied to Jeffrey Epstein does not mean you had an encounter with an underage girl
What accusation of pedophilia?
Maybe you should get the poster banned? Test the rule and see if you are correct, you aren't.
How so? Even if that is true, how does the offending post suggest an "encounter with a child?"
Where is an accusation of pedophilia?
You are still missing an essential link.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
"NAMBLA logic".
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
If you're really a lawyer, then you should be reading more of the rule than only those four words, Jarod.
While your defense of Ms. Edwina is admirable, even chivalrous, all members can do is report violations, not judge the merits of the report nor resolve it.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Even if Trump never raped a 15 to 17 year old, the fact he was fully aware that Epstein did and stayed his friend means Pedo Don was complicit in the crime.
I suggest you all drop this subject. It’s a dangerous one.
Didn't Nancy pelosi March in the same parade with Harry Hay of NAMBLA
So she had to be fully aware of who and what NAMBLA is
Yakuda
Verified User
who are here legally
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Good advice, but, as you've noticed, many of JPP's members, especially the MAGAts and faux Christians, are not that bright.
Besides, as Lesion Lameass taught me, it can be a fun game much like a logrolling contest. The first to fall off loses. LOL
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
IDK. I'm not a Democrat nor a Nancy Pelosi fan like you.
If true, that's a reasonable theory. Did she have knowledge of a crime or are you simply admitting that Ms. Edwina committed a 12B violation by accusing me of being with NAMBLA?
I believe suggesting rules were broken when they were not, weakens the rules. I think it is a good rule, but Ms. Edwina did not break them.If you're really a lawyer, then you should be reading more of the rule than only those four words, Jarod.
While your defense of Ms. Edwina is admirable, even chivalrous, all members can do is report violations, not judge the merits of the report nor resolve it.
No, ALL PEOPLE. Where does it say all people, "who are here legally"?
Did you imagine that part?